Students’ perceptions of the peer-feedback experience in MOOCs

References

• Alqassab, M., Strijbos, J. W., & Ufer, S. (2018). Training peer-feedback skills on geometric construction tasks: role of domain knowledge and peer-feedback levels. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 33(11), 11–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-017-0342-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonaci, A., Klemke, R., Lataster, J., Kreijns K., & Specht, M. (2019). Gamification of MOOCs adopting social presence and sense of community to increase user’s engagement: An experimental study. In M. Scheffel, J. Broison, V. Pammer-Schindler, A. Ioannou, & J. Schneider (Eds.), Lecture notes in computer science: Vol. 11722. Transforming learning with meaningful technologies (pp. 172–186). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29736-7_13
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(6), 698–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2012.691462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315–1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, C. (2013). Making sense of assessment feedback in higher education. Review of Educational Research, 83(1), 70–120. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312474350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gikandi, J. W., Morrow, D., & Davis, N. E. (2011). Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of the literature. Computers & Education, 57, 2333–2351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovardas, T., Tsivitanidou, O. E., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2014). Peer versus expert feedback: An investigation of the quality of peer feedback among secondary school students. Computers & Education, 71, 133–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsiao, Y. P., Brouns, F., van Bruggen, J., & Sloep, P. B. (2015). Effects of training peer tutors in content knowledge versus tutoring skills on giving feedback to help tutees’ complex tasks. Educational Studies, 41(5), 499–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2015.1062079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huisman, B., Saab, N., Van Driel, J., & Van Den Broek, P. (2019). A questionnaire to assess students’ beliefs about peer-feedback. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 57(3), 328–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2019.1630294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jönsson, A., & Panadero, E. (2017). Assessment for learning strategies and lmplementation. In D. Carless, S. M. Bridges, C. K. Y. Chan, & R. Glofcheski (Eds.), Scaling up assessment for learning in higher education (pp. 99–111). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jönsson A., & Svingby, G. (2007). The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences. Educational Research Review, 2, 130–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.002
   Google Scholar
• Jung, E., Kim, D., Yoon, M., Park, S., & Oakley, B. (2019). The influence of instructional design on learner control, sense of achievement, and perceived effectiveness in a supersize MOOC course. Computers & Education, 128, 377–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasch, J., Van Rosmalen, P., & Kalz, M. (2017). A framework towards educational scalability of open online courses. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 23(9), 845–867. https://doi.org/10.3217/jucs-023-09-0845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasch, J., Van Rosmalen, P., & Kalz, M. (2020). Educational scalability in MOOCs: Analysing instructional designs to find best practices. Computers & Education, 161, Article 104054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104054
   Google Scholar
• Keppell, M., Au, E., Ma, A., & Chan, C. (2006). Peer learning and learning‐oriented assessment in technology‐enhanced environments. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(4), 453–464. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930600679159
   Google Scholar
• Kristensen, P. (2004, September 27–29). The DPSIR Framework [Paper presentation]. Workshop on a Comprehensive/Detailed Assessment of the Vulnerability of Water Resources to Environmental Change in Africa using River Basin Approach, Nairobi, Kenya. https://wwz.ifremer.fr/dce/content/download/69291/913220/DPSIR.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kulkarni, C., Wei, P.W., Chia, H. Le, D., Papadopoulos, K., Cheng, J., Koller, D., & Klemmer, S. (2013). Peer and self-assessment in massive online classes. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 20(6), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1145/2505057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, N., & Carless, D. (2006). Peer-feedback: The learning element of peer assessment. Teaching Higher Education, 11, 279–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510600680582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löhr, A., Savelli, H., Beunen, R., Kalz, M., Ragas, A., & Van Belleghem, F. (2017). Solutions for global marine litter pollution. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 28, 90–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.08.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, H., Robinson, A., & Park, J. Y. (2014). Peer grading in a MOOC: Reliability, validity, and perceived effects. Online Learning Journal, 18(2), 1–14. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/183756/
   Google Scholar
• McBrien, J. L., Cheng, R., & Jones, P. (2009). Virtual spaces: Employing a synchronous online classroom to facilitate student engagement in online learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v10i3.605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J. (2017). Enhancing feedback in higher education: Students’ attitudes towards online and in-class formative assessment feedback models. Active Learning in Higher Education, 18, 127–141.https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787417707615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meek, S. E., Blakemore, L., & Marks, L. (2017). Is peer review an appropriate form of assessment in a MOOC? Student participation and performance in formative peer review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(6), 1000–1013. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1221052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercader, C., Ion, G., & Díaz-Vicario, A. (2020). Factors influencing students’ peer feedback uptake: instructional design matters. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1726283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, M. G. (2013). The handbook of distance education (3rd ed.). Routlege. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203803738
   Google Scholar
• Mulder, R. A., Pearce, J. M., & Baik, C. (2014). Peer review in higher education: Student perceptions before and after participation. Active Learning in Higher Education, 15, 157–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/146978741452739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narciss, S., & Huth, K. (2004). How to design informative tutoring feedback for multimedia learning. In H. M. Niegemann, D. Leutner, & R. Brünken (Eds.), Instructional design for multimedia learning (pp. 181–195). Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Neubaum, G., Wichmann, A., Eimler, S.C., & Krämer, N. C. (2014). Investigating incentives for students to provide peer feedback in a semi-open online course: An experimental study. In D. Riehle, J. M. Gonzalez-Barahona, G. Robles, K. M. Möslein, I. Schieferdecker, U. Cress, A. Wichmann, B. Hecht, & N. Jullie (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Open Collaboration (pp. 27–29). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2641580.2641604
   Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2007). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. J., Thomson, A., & Breslin. C. (2014). Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: A peer review perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39, 102–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.795518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, C. (2012). ‘Some kind of weird, evil experiment’: Student perceptions of peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(6), 719–731. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2011.563281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phua, P. L., Wong, L. S., & Abu, R. (2012). Factors influencing the behavioral intention to use the internet as a teaching-learning tool in home economics. Procedia –Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 180–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.263
   Google Scholar
• Price, M., Handley, K., & Millar, J. (2011). Feedback: Focusing attention on engagement. Studies in Higher Education, 36(8), 879–896. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.483513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reich, J., & Ruipérez-Valiente, J. A. (2019). The MOOC pivot. Science, 363(6423), 130–131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav7958
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sluijsmans, D. M. A., Brand-Gruwel, S., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2002). Peer assessment training in teacher education: Effects on performance and perceptions. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(5), 443–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293022000009311
   Google Scholar
• Suen, H. K. (2014). Peer-assessment for massive open online courses (MOOCs). The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(3), 312–327. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i3.1680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabuenca, B., Kalz, M., & Löhr, A. (2019). Massive open online education for environmental activism: The worldwide problem of marine litter. Sustainability, 11(10), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tai, J., Canny, B., Haines, T., & Molloy, E. (2016). The role of peer-assisted learning in building evaluative judgement: Opportunities in clinical medical education. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 21(3), 659–676. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-015-9659-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Gennip, N. A., Segers, M.S., & Tillema, H. H. (2009). Peer assessment for learning from a social perspective: The influence of interpersonal variables and structural features. Educational Research Review, 4(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2008.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vonderwell, S., Liang, X., & Alderman, K. (2007). Asynchronous discussions and assessment in online learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2007.10782485
   Google Scholar
• Wang, W. (2014). Students’ perceptions of rubric-referenced peer feedback on EFL writing: A longitudinal inquiry. Assessing Writing, 19, 80–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2013.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winstone, N., & Carless, D. (2019). Designing effective feedback processes in higher education: A learning-focused approach. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351115940
   Google Scholar
• Xie, K. (2013). What do the numbers say? The influence of motivation and peer feedback on students’ behaviour in online discussions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(2), 288–301. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01291.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yousef, A. M. F., Wahid, U., Chatti, M. A., Schroeder, U., & Wosnitza, M. (2015). The effect of peer assessment rubrics on learner’s satisfaction and performance within a blended MOOC environment. In M. Helfert, M. T. Restivo, S. Zvacek & J. Uhomoibhi (Eds.), Computer Supported Education: Vol. 1. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computer Supported Education (pp.148–159). Science and Technology Publications. https://doi.org/10.5220/0005495501480159
   Google Scholar
• Yu, S., & Hu, G. (2017). Understanding university students’ peer feedback practices in EFL writing: Insights from a case study. Assessing Writing, 33, 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2017.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zutshi, S., O’Hare, S., & Rodafinos, A. (2013). Experiences in MOOCs: The perspective of students. American Journal of Distance Education, 27(4), 218–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2013.838067
   Google Scholar