References
- Becker, N., Koch, M., Schult, J., & Spinath, F. M. (2019). Setting doesn’t matter much, European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 35(3), 309–316. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000402
- Best, L. M., & Shelley, D. J. (2018). Academic dishonesty: Does social media allow for increased and more sophisticated levels of student cheating? International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 14(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJICTE.2018070101
- Boevé, A. J., Meijer, R. R., Albers, C. J., Beetsma, Y., & Bosker, R. J. (2015). Introducing computer-based testing in high-stakes exams in higher education: Results of a field experiment. PloS One, 10 (12),Article e0143616. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143616
- Bohmer, C., Feldmann, N., & Ibsen, M. (2018). E-exams in engineering education — online testing of engineering competencies: Experiences and lessons learned. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (pp. 571–576). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2018.8363281
- Cluskey, G. R., Ehlen, C. R., & Raiborn, M. H. (2011). Thwarting online exam cheating without proctor supervision, Journal of Academic & Business Ethics, 4, 1–7. https://www.aabri.com/manuscripts/11775.pdf
- Crawford, J., Butler-Henderson, K., Rudolph, J., Malkawi, B., Glowatz, M., Burton, R., Magni, P. A., & Lam, S. (2020). COVID-19: 20 countries’ higher education intra-period digital pedagogy responses, Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 3(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2020.3.1.7
- Duncan, H., & Purcell, C. (2017). Equity or Advantage? The effect of receiving access arrangements in university exams on humanities students with specific learning difficulties (SpLD), Widening Participation and Lifelong Learning, 19(2), 6–26. https://doi.org/10.5456/WPLL.19.2.6
- Durning, S. J., Dong, T., Ratcliffe, T., Schuwirth, L., Artino, A. R., Jr., Boulet, J. R., & Eva, K. (2016). Comparing open-book and closed-book examinations: A systematic review, Academic Medicine, 91(4), 583–599. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000977
- Edland, A., & Svenson, O. (1993). Judgment and decision making under time pressure. In O. Svenson & A. J. Maule (Eds.), Time pressure and stress in human judgment and decision making (pp. 27–40). Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-6846-6_2
- Fask, A., Englander, F., & Wang, Z. (2014). Do online exams facilitate cheating? An experiment designed to separate possible cheating from the effect of the online test taking environment, Journal of Academic Ethics, 12(2), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-014-9207-1
- Green, S. G., Ferrante, C. J., & Heppard, K. A. (2016). Using open-book exams to enhance student learning, performance, and motivation, Journal of Effective Teaching, 16(1), 19–35. https://uncw.edu/jet/articles/vol16_1/index.htm
- Ha, L. A, Yaneva, V., Baldwin, P., & Mee, J. (2019). Predicting the difficulty of multiple choice questions in a high-stakes medical exam. In H. Yannakoudakis, E. Kochmar, C. Leacock, N. Madnani, I. Pilán, & T. Zesch (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourteenth Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications (pp. 11–20). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W19-4402
- Jensen, J. L., Berry, D. A., & Kummer, T. A. (2013). Investigating the effects of exam length on performance and cognitive fatigue. PloS One, 8(8), Article e70270, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070270
- Kotera, Y., Cockerill, V., Green, P., Hutchinson, L., Shaw, P., & Bowskill, N. (2019). Towards another kind of borderlessness: Online students with disabilities, Distance Education, 40(2), 170–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2019.1600369
- Lindner, M. A., Mayntz, S. M., & Schult, J. (2018). Studentische Bewertung und Präferenz von Hochschulprüfungen mit Aufgaben im offenen und geschlossenen Antwortformat [Students’ evaluations of and preferences in exams with open-ended and closed-ended questions in higher education], Zeitschrift Für Pädagogische Psychologie, 32(4), 239–248. https://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652/a000229
- Lindner, M. A., Strobel, B., & Köller, O. (2015). Multiple-Choice-Prüfungen an Hochschulen? Ein Literaturüberblick und Plädoyer für mehr praxisorientierte Forschung [Multiple-choice exams in higher education? A literature review and plea for more practice-oriented research], Zeitschrift Für Pädagogische Psychologie, 29, 133–149. https://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652/a000156
- Okada, A., Whitelock, D., Holmes, W., & Edwards, C. (2019). E-authentication for online assessment: A mixed-method study, British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(2), 861–875. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12608
- De Paola, M., & Gioia, F. (2016). Who performs better under time pressure? Results from a field experiment, Journal of Economic Psychology, 53, 37–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2015.12.002
- Partchev, I., Boeck, P. de, & Steyer, R. (2013). How much power and speed is measured in this test? Assessment, 20(2), 242–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191111411658
- Perlini, A. H., Lind, D. L., & Zumbo, B. D. (1998). Context effects on examinations: The effects of time, item order and item difficulty, Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 39(4), 299–307. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0086821
- Rakes, G. C. (2008). Open book testing in online learning environments, Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 7(1), 1–9. http://www.ncolr.org/issues/jiol/v7/n1/open-book-testing-in-online-learning-environments.html
- Richardson, J. T.E. (2009). The attainment and experiences of disabled students in distance education, Distance Education, 30(1), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910902845931
- Rieskamp, J., & Hoffrage, U. (2008). Inferences under time pressure: How opportunity costs affect strategy selection, Acta Psychologica, 127(2), 258–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.05.004
- Rummer, R., Schweppe, J., & Schwede, A. (2019). Open-book versus closed-book tests in university classes: A field experiment. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00463
- Sarrayrih, M. A., & Ilyas, M. (2013). Challenges of online exam, performances and problems for online university exam, International Journal of Computer Science Issues (IJCSI), 10(1), 439–443. https://www.ijcsi.org/articles/Challenges-of-online-exam-performance-and-problems-for-online-university-exam.php
- Schult, J., Stadler, M., Becker, N., Greiff, S., & Sparfeldt, J. R. (2017). Home alone: Complex problem solving performance benefits from individual online assessment, Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 513–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.054
- Shevlin, M., Kenny, M., & Mcneela, E. (2004). Participation in higher education for students with disabilities: An Irish perspective, Disability & Society, 19(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/0968759032000155604
- Son, L. K., & Metcalfe, J. (2000). Metacognitive and control strategies in study-time allocation, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(1), 204–221. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.26.1.204
- Steinmayr, R., & Spinath, B. (2019). Why time constraints increase the gender gap in measured numerical intelligence in academically high achieving samples, European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 35(3), 392–402. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000400
- Svenson, O., & Maule, A. J. (Eds.). (1993). Time pressure and stress in human judgment and decision making. Springer.
- Telles-Langdon, D. M. (2020). Transitioning university courses online in response to COVID-19, Journal of Teaching and Learning, 14(1), 108–119. https://doi.org/10.22329/jtl.v14i1.6262
- Thiede, K. W. (1996). The relative importance of anticipated test format and anticipated test difficulty on performance, The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 49(4), 901–918. https://doi.org/10.1080/713755673
- Ullah, A., Xiao, H., & Barker, T. (2016, October). A classification of threats to remote online examinations. In I. Staff (Ed.), Proceedings of the Annual Information Technology, Electronics and Mobile Communication Conference (pp. 1–7). IEEE, https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMCON.2016.7746085
- Voyer, D. (2011). Time limits and gender differences on paper-and-pencil tests of mental rotation: A meta-analysis, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(2), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-010-0042-0
- Waterfield, J., & West, B. (2006). Inclusive assessment in higher education: A resource for change, University of Plymouth. https://www.plymouth.ac.uk/uploads/production/document/path/3/3026/Space_toolkit.pdf
- Weiner, J. A., & Hurtz, G. M. (2017). A comparative study of online remote proctored versus onsite proctored high-stakes exams, Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 18(1), 13–20. http://www.jattjournal.com/index.php/atp/article/view/113061
- Wilcox, R. R. (2012). Introduction to robust estimation and hypothesis testing (3rd ed.). Elsevier/Academic Press.