References
- Akyol, Z., & Garrison, R. (2008). The development of a community of inquiry over time in an online course: Understanding the progression and integration of social, cognitive and teaching presence. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 12(3–4), 3–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v12i3-4.1680
- Anderson, T., Liam, R., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v5i2.1875
- Angelaina, S., & Jimoyiannis, A. (2012). Analyzing students’ engagement and learning presence in an educational blog community. Educational Media International, 49(3), 183–200. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2012.738012
- Arbaugh, J. B., & Hwang, A. (2006). Does “teaching presence” exist in online MBA courses? The Internet and Higher Education, 9(1), 9–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2005.12.001
- Arfé, B., Vardanega, T., & Ronconi, L. (2020). The effects of coding on children’s planning and inhibition skills. Computers & Education, 148. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103807
- Astin, A. W. (1999). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Development, 40(5), 518–529.
- Barratt, J. M., & Duran, F. (2021). Does psychological capital and social support impact engagement and burnout in online distance learning students? The Internet and Higher Education, 51(3). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2021.100821
- Benedek, A., & Molnár, G. (2015, July 20–24).E-teaching and digitalization at BME [Paper presentation]. 19th International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEE2015), Zagreb, Croatia.
- Bocchi, J., Eastman, J. K., & Swift, C. O. (2004). Retaining the online learner: Profile of students in an online MBA program and implications for teaching them. Journal of Education for Business, 79(4), 245–253. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.79.4.245-253
- Budiman, Z. B., Halim, L., Mohd Meerah, S., & Osman, K. (2014). The effects of cognitive conflict management on cognitive development and science achievement. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(5), 1169–1195. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9460-6
- Bush, T., & Qiang, H. (2013). Leadership and culture in Chinese Education. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 2, 58–67. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2000.10600183
- Caskurlu, S. (2018). Confirming the subdimensions of teaching, social, and cognitive presences: A construct validity study. The Internet and Higher Education, 39, 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.05.002
- Caskurlu, S., Maeda, Y., Richardson, J. C., & Lv, J. (2020). A meta-analysis addressing the relationship between teaching presence and students’ satisfaction and learning. Computers & Education, 157. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103966
- Chakraborty, M., & Nafukho, F. M. (2015). Strategies for virtual learning environments: Focusing on teaching presence and teaching immediacy. Internet Learning Journal, 4(1), 8–37. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18278/il.4.1.1
- Chen, C., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P. M., Sasselov, D., & Fredericks, C. (2020). The impact of student misconceptions on student persistence in a MOOC. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(6), 879–910. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21616
- Chen, M. A., Hwang, G., & Chang, Y. (2019). A reflective thinking‐promoting approach to enhancing graduate students’ flipped learning engagement, participation behaviors, reflective thinking and project learning outcomes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2288–2307. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12823
- Chew, L. L., & Polytechnic, T. (2015). Enhanced student engagement and meaningful learning: A curriculum redesign. International Journal of Pedagogy & Curriculum, 22(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-7963/cgp/v22i02/48879
- Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1998). An empirical test of a taxonomy of responses to anomalous data in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 623–654. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199808)35:6<623AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-O
- Dwivedi, A., Dwivedi, P., Bobek, S., & Zabukovsek, S. (2019). Factors affecting students’ engagement with online content in blended learning. Kybernetes, 48(7), 1500–1515. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/K-10-2018-0559
- Fleiss, J. L., & Cohen, J. (1973). The equivalence of weighted kappa and the intraRound 3orrelation coefficient as measures of reliability. Educational and psychological measurement, 33(3), 613–619. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447303300309
- Foster, L., Colburn, A. N., & Briggs, C. (2018). Language & online learning: Inform, inspire and engage virtual learning communities. Journal of Counselor Preparation & Supervision, 11(1), 1–25. https://repository.wcsu.edu/jcps/vol11/iss1/6
- Fredricks, J. A., & McColskey, W. (2012). The measurement of student engagement: A comparative analysis of various methods and student self-report instruments. In S. Christenson, A. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 763–782). Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_37
- Garrison, D. R., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2007). Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(3), 157–172. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.04.001
- Garrison, D. R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Fung, T. (2010). Exploring causal relationships among teaching, cognitive and social presence: Student perceptions of the community of inquiry framework. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1), 31–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.002
- Gunawan, K., & Lestari, P. A. S. (2020). Instructional materials for discovery learning with cognitive conflict approach to improve vocational students’ achievement. International Journal of Instruction, 13(3), 433–444. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13330a
- Gurley, L. E. (2018). Educators’ preparation to teach, perceived teaching presence, and perceived teaching presence behaviors in blended and online learning environments. Online Learning, 22(2), 197–220. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i2.1255
- Hadjiachilleos, S., Valanides, N., & Angeli, C. (2013). The impact of cognitive and affective aspects of cognitive conflict on learners’ conceptual change about floating and sinking. Research in Science & Technological Education, 31(2), 133–152. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2013.811074
- Hameiri, B., Nabet, E., Bar-Tal, D., & Halperin, E. (2018). Paradoxical Thinking as a Conflict-Resolution Intervention: Comparison to Alternative Interventions and Examination of Psychological Mechanisms. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(1), 122–139. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217736048
- Heflin, H., Shewmaker, J., & Nguyen, J. (2017). Impact of mobile technology on student attitudes, engagement, and learning. Computers & education, 107(4), 91–99. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.01.006
- Heimbuch, S., & Bodemer, D. (2017). Controversy awareness on evidence-led discussions as guidance for students in wiki-based learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 33, 1–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.12.001
- Henrie, C. R., Halverson, L. R., & Graham, C. R. (2015). Measuring student engagement in technology-mediated learning: A review. Computers & Education, 90, 36–53. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.09.005
- Hosler, K. A., & Arend, B. D. (2012). The importance of course design, feedback, and facilitation: student perceptions of the relationship between teaching presence and cognitive presence. Educational Media International, 49(3), 217–229. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2012.738014
- Houssa, M., Nader-Grosbois, N., & Jacobs, E. (2013). Experimental study of short-term training in social cognition in pre-schoolers. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 2(1), 139–154. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v2i1.181
- Huang, T. H., Liu, Y. C., & Shiu, C. Y. (2008). Construction of an online learning system for decimal numbers through the use of cognitive conflict strategy. Computers & Education, 50(1), 61–76. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.03.007
- Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (2000). Constructive controversy: The educative power of intellectual conflict. Change, 32(1), 28–37. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00091380009602706
- Jung, Y., & Lee, J. (2018). Learning engagement and persistence in massive open online courses (MOOCS). Computers & Education, 122(2), 9–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.013
- Kang, S., Scharmann, L. C., & Noh, T. (2004). Reexamining the role of cognitive conflict in science concept learning. Research in Science Education, 34(1), 71–96. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RISE.0000021001.77568.b3
- Kent, C., Laslo, E., & Rafaeli, S. (2016). Interactivity in online discussions and learning outcomes. Computers & Education, 97, 116–128. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.002
- Kozan, K. (2016). The incremental predictive validity of teaching, cognitive and social presence on cognitive load. The Internet and Higher Education, 31, 11–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.05.003
- Kozan, K., & Richardson, J. C. (2014). Interrelationships between and among social, teaching, and cognitive presence. The Internet and Higher Education, 21, 68–73. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.10.007
- Lampros, K., & Panagiotis, A. (2019). The importance of “teaching presence” and the new role of the teacher in contemporary learning environments focusing on pedagogical exploitation of interactive videoconferencing. Open Education: The Journal for Open & Distance Education & Educational Technology, 15(1), 202–211. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12681/jode.18961
- Law, K. M. Y., Geng, S., & Li, T. (2019). Student enrollment, motivation and learning performance in a blended learning environment: The mediating effects of social, teaching, and cognitive presence. Computers & Education, 136, 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.021
- Lee, G., Kwon, J., & Park, S. (2003). Development of an instrument for measuring cognitive conflict in secondary-level science classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(6), 585–603. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10099
- Louis-Jean, J., & Cenat, K. (2020). Beyond the face-to-face learning: A contextual analysis. Pedagogical Research, 5 (4),Article em0077. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/8466
- Parwati, N. N., & Suharta, I. G. P. (2020). Effectiveness of the implementation of cognitive conflict strategy assisted by e-service learning to reduce students’ mathematical misconceptions. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(11), 102–118. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i11.11802
- Piaget, J. (1977). Problems of equilibration. In M. H. Appel & L. S. Goldberg (Eds.), Topics in cognitive development: Vol. 1. Equilibration: Theory, research, and application (pp. 3–13). Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-4175-8_1
- Roffe, I. (2002). E‐learning: Engagement, enhancement and execution. Quality Assurance in Education, 10(1), 40–50. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880210416102
- Schnaubert, L., & Bodemer, D. (2019). Providing different types of group awareness information to guide collaborative learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 14, 7–51. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-018-9293-y
- Shea, P., Li, C. S., & Pickett, A. (2006). A study of teaching presence and student sense of learning community in fully online and web-enhanced college courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 9(3), 175–190. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.06.005
- Skoumios, M. (2018). Students’ conceptions in science and socio-cognitive conflict processes, The International Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Learning, 25(3), 3–4. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-7971/CGP/v25i02/1-16
- Stein, D. S., Wanstreet, C. E., Slagle, P., Trinko, L. A., & Lutz, M. (2013). From ‘hello’ to higher-order thinking: The effect of coaching and feedback on online chats. The Internet and Higher Education, 16, 78–84. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.03.001
- Sun, J. C. & Rueda, R. (2012). Situational interest, computer self-efficacy and self-regulation: Their impact on student engagement in distance education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43, 191–204. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01157.x
- Tsai, Y., Lin, C., Hong, J., & Tai, K. (2018). The effects of metacognition on online learning interest and continuance to learn with MOOCs. Computers & Education, 121, 18–29. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.011
- Wang, Y., & Liu, Q. (2020). Effects of online teaching presence on students’ interactions and collaborative knowledge construction. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(3), 370–382. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12408
- Wang, Y., Wang, Y., Stein, D., Liu, Q., & Chen, W. (2019). Examining Chinese beginning online instructors’ competencies in teaching online based on the Activity theory. Journal of Computers in Education, 1–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-019-00140-w
- Watson, S. L., Watson, W. R., Richardson, J., & Loizzo, J. (2016). Instructor’s use of social presence, teaching presence, and attitudinal dissonance: A case study of an attitudinal change MOOC. International Review of Research in Open & Distance Learning, 17(3), 54–74. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2379
- Wei, H. C., Peng, H., & Chou, C. (2015). Can more interactivity improve learning achievement in an online course? effects of college students’ perception and actual use of a course-management system on their learning achievement. Computers & Education, 83(4), 10–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.12.013
- Xie, K., Lu, L., Cheng, S.-L., & Izmirli, S. (2017). The interactions between facilitator identity, conflictual presence, and social presence in peer-moderated online collaborative learning. Distance Education, 38(2), 230–244. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2017.1322458
- Xu, B., Chen, N.-S., & Chen, G. (2020). Effects of teacher role on student engagement in WeChat-Based online discussion learning. Computers & Education, 157. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103956
- Zabihi, R. (2020). The effects of task type on the resolution of grammatical cognitive conflict episodes and grammar learning. Language Learning Journal, 1–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2020.1795913
- Zhang, H., Lin, L., Zhan, Y., & Ren, Y. (2016). The impact of teaching presence on online engagement behaviors. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 54(7), 887–900. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633116648171
- Zhang, X., Meng, Y., Ordóñez de Pablos, P., & Sun, Y. (2019). Learning analytics in collaborative learning supported by Slack: From the perspective of engagement. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 625–633. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.012
- Zhao, H., & Sullivan, K. P. (2017). Teaching presence in computer conferencing learning environments: Effects on interaction, cognition and learning uptake. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 538–551. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12383
- Zilvinskis, J., Masseria, A., & Pike, G. (2017). Student engagement and student learning: examining the convergent and discriminant validity of the Revised National Survey of Student Engagement. Research in Higher Education, 58(8), 880–903. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-017-9450-6