References
- Akyol, Z., Arbaugh, J. B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Garrison, D. R., Ice, P., Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. (2009). A response to the review of the community of inquiry framework. Journal of Distance Education, 23(2), 123–136. http://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/630
- Anderson, T., Liam, R., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v5i2.1875
- Atif, A., Richards, D., Liu, D., Bilgin, A. A.(2020). Perceived benefits and barriers of a prototype early alert system to detect engagement and support ‘at-risk’ students: The teacher perspective. Computers & Education, 156, Article 103954. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103954
- Barratt, J. M., & Duran, F. (2021). Does psychological capital and social support impact engagement and burnout in online distance learning students? The Internet and Higher Education, 51, Article 100821. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2021.100821
- Barrett, A. J., Pack, A., & Quaid, E. D. (2021). Understanding learners’ acceptance of high-immersion virtual reality systems: Insights from confirmatory and exploratory PLS-SEM analyses. Computers & Education, 169, Article 104214. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104214
- Baxter, J. A., & Haycock, J. (2014). Roles and student identities in online large course forums: Implications for practice. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(1), 20–40. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i1.1593
- Bedenlier, S., Bond, M., Buntins, K., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Facilitating student engagement through educational technology in higher education: A systematic review in the field of arts and humanities. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(4), 126–150. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5477
- Benitez, J., Henseler, J., Castillo, A., & Schuberth, F. (2019). How to perform and report an impactful analysis using partial least squares: Guidelines for confirmatory and explanatory IS research. Information & Management, 57(2), 103–168. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2019.05.003
- Bond, M. (2020). Facilitating student engagement through the flipped learning approach in K-12: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 151, Article 103819. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103819
- Bovermann, K., & Bastiaens, T. J. (2020). Towards a motivational design? Connecting gamification user types and online learning activities. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 15(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-019-0121-4
- Caskurlu, S., Maeda, Y., Richardson, J. C., & Lv, J. (2020). A meta-analysis addressing the relationship between teaching presence and students’ satisfaction and learning. Computers & Education, 157, Article 103966. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103966
- Chang, C.-Y., Lee, D.-C., Tang, K.-Y., & Hwang, G.-J. (2021). Effect sizes and research directions of peer assessments: From an integrated perspective of meta-analysis and co-citation network. Computers & Education, 164, Article 104123. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104123
- Cho, M. H., & Cho, Y. (2014). Instructor scaffolding for interaction and students' academic engagement in online learning: Mediating role of perceived online class goal structures. The Internet and Higher Education, 21, 25–30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.10.008
- Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
- Garrison, D. R., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2005). Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: Interaction is not enough. American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 133–148. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15389286ajde1903_2
- Hilliard, L. P., & Stewart, M. K. (2019). Time well spent: Creating a community of inquiry in blended first-year writing courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 41, 11–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.11.002
- Juan. S., (2021). Promoting engagement of nursing students in online learning: Use of the student-generated question in a nursing leadership course. Nurse Education Today, 97(2), 1–5. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104710
- Jung, Y., & Lee, J. (2018). Learning engagement and persistence in massive open online courses (MOOCS). Computers & Education, 122, 9–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.013
- Kovanović, V., Joksimović, S., Poquet, O., Hennis, T., de Vries, P., Hatala, M., Dawson, S., Siemens, G., & Gašević, D. (2019). Examining communities of inquiry in massive open online courses: The role of study strategies. The Internet and Higher Education, 40, 20–43. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.09.001
- Law, K. M. Y., Geng, S., & Li, T. (2019). Student enrollment, motivation and learning performance in a blended learning environment: The mediating effects of social, teaching, and cognitive presence. Computers & Education, 136, 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.021
- Louwrens, N., & Hartnett, M. (2015). Student and teacher perceptions of online student engagement in an online middle school. Journal of Open, Flexible, and Distance Learning, 19(1), 27–44. https://www.jofdl.nz/index.php/JOFDL/article/view/241/188
- Manwaring, K. C., Larsen, R., Graham, C. R., Henrie, C. R., & Halverson, L. R. (2017). Investigating student engagement in blended learning settings using experience sampling and structural equation modeling. The Internet and Higher Education, 35, 21–33. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.06.002
- Martin, F., Ritzhaupt, A., Kumar, S., & Budhrani, K. (2019). Award-winning faculty online teaching practices: Course design, assessment and evaluation, and facilitation. The Internet and Higher Education, 42, 34–43. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.04.001
- Martin, F., Sun, T., & Westine, C. D. (2020). A systematic review of research on online teaching and learning from 2009 to 2018. Computers & Education, 159, Article 104009. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104009
- McNeill, L., Rice, M., Wright, V. (2019). A confirmatory factor analysis of a teaching presence instrument in an online computer applications course. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration. 22(4), 1–16. https://www.westga.edu/∼distance/ojdla/winter224/mcneillricewright224.html
- Montgomery, A. P., Hayward, D. V., Dunn, W., Carbonaro, M., & Amrhein, C. G. (2015). Blending for student engagement: Lessons learned for MOOCs and beyond. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(6), 657–670. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1869
- Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric methods. McGraw-Hill.
- O’Regan, K. (2003). Emotion and e-learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(3), 78–92. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v7i3.1847
- Pentaraki, A., & Burkholder, G. (2017). Emerging evidence regarding the roles of emotional, behavioural, and cognitive aspects of student engagement in the online classroom. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 20(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/eurodl-2017-0001
- Pérez-López, R., Gurrea-Sarasa, R., Herrando, C., Martín-De Hoyos, M. J., Bordonaba-Juste, V., & Utrillas-Acerete, A. (2020). The generation of student engagement as a cognition-affect-behaviour process in a Twitter learning experience. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 132–146. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5751
- Rolim, V., Ferreira, R., Lins, R. D., & Gǎsević, D. (2019). A network-based analytic approach to uncovering the relationship between social and cognitive presences in communities of inquiry. The Internet and Higher Education, 42, 53–65. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.05.001
- Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2010). Learning presence: Towards a theory of self-efficacy, self-regulation, and the development of a communities of inquiry in online and blended learning environments. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1721–1731. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.017
- Shea, P., Hayes, S., & Vickers, J. (2010). Online instructional effort measured through the lens of teaching presence in the community of inquiry framework: A re-examination of measures and approach. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 11(3), 127–154. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v11i3.915
- Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 571–581. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.85.4.571
- Sun, J. C. Y., & Rueda, R. (2012). Situational interest, computer self‐efficacy and self‐regulation: Their impact on student engagement in distance education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(2), 191–204. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01157.x
- Sun, Y., Guo, Y., & Zhao, Y. (2020). Understanding the determinants of learner engagement in MOOCs: An adaptive structuration perspective. Computers & Education, 157, Article 103963. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103963
- Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V. E., Chatelin, Y. M., Lauro, C.(2005). PLS path modeling. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 48 (1), 159–205. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2004.03.005
- Wang, C., Fang, T., & Gu, Y. (2020). Learning performance and behavioral patterns of online collaborative learning: Impact of cognitive load and affordances of different multimedia. Computers & Education, 143, Article 103683. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103683
- Wang, Y., & Liu, Q. (2020). Effects of online teaching presence on students’ interactions and collaborative knowledge construction. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(3), 370–382. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12408
- Wang, Y., & Stein, D. (2021). Effects of online teaching presence on students’ cognitive conflict and engagement. Distance Education, 42(4), 547–566. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2021.1987837
- Wang, Y., Stein, D., & Shen, S. (2021). Students’ and teachers’ perceived teaching presence in online courses. Distance Education, 42(3), 373–390. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2021.1956304
- Wang, Y., Zhao, L., Shen, S., Chen, W. (2021). Constructing a teaching presence measurement framework based on the community of inquiry theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 1(12), 01–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.694386
- Watson, S. L., Watson, W. R., Richardson, J., & Loizzo, J. (2016). Instructor’s use of social presence, teaching presence, and attitudinal dissonance: A case study of an attitudinal change MOOC. The International Review of Research in Open & Distance Learning, 17(3), 54–74. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2379
- Xiong, Y., Li, H., Kornhaber, M. L., Suen, H. K., Pursel, B., & Goins, D. D. (2015). Examining the relations among student motivation, engagement, and retention in a MOOC: A structural equation modeling approach. Global Education Review, 2(3), 23–33. https://ger.mercy.edu/index.php/ger/article/view/124
- Xu, B., Chen, N.-S., & Chen, G. (2020). Effects of teacher role on student engagement in WeChat-based online discussion learning. Computers & Education, 157, Article 103956. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103956
- Zhang, H., Lin, L., Zhan, Y., & Ren, Y. (2016). The impact of teaching presence on online engagement behaviors. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 54(7), 887–900. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633116648171
- Zhao, H., & Sullivan, K. P. H. (2017). Teaching presence in computer conferencing learning environments: Effects on interaction, cognition and learning uptake. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 538–551. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12383