References
- Armstrong, P. (2010). Bloom’s taxonomy. Vanderbilt University Center for Teaching. https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/guides-sub-pages/blooms-taxonomy/
- Austin, A. E. (2009). Cognitive apprenticeship theory and its implications for doctoral education: A case example from a doctoral program in higher and adult education. International Journal for Academic Development, 14(3), 173–183. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13601440903106494
- Benson, A. D. (2003). Assessing participant learning in online environments. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2003(100), 69–78. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.120
- Braun, T. (2008). Making a choice: The perceptions and attitudes of online graduate students. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 16(1), 63–92. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/21874/
- Bryan, B., & Guccione, K. (2017). Was it worth it? A qualitative exploration into graduate perceptions of doctoral value. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(6), 1124–1140. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1479378
- Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). e-Learning and the science of instruction. Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning (4th ed.). Wiley.
- Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453–494). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
- Creswell, J. W. (2015). Educational research: Planning and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (5th ed.). Pearson.
- Dixson, M. D. (2010). Creating effective student engagement in online courses: What do students find engaging? Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(2), 1–13. https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/josotl/article/view/1744
- Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
- Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (3rd ed.). Sage.
- Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning, 22(1), 205–222. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092
- McRay, J., Goertzen, B., & Klaus, K. (2016). Student-moderated discussion boards in a graduate online course. Journal of Leadership Education, 15(1), 151–160. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12806/V15/I1/A6
- Moore, M. J. (1993). Three types of interaction. In K. Harry, M. John, & D. Keegan (Eds.), Distance education theory (pp. 19–24). Routledge.
- O’Keefe, L., Rafferty, J., Gunder, A., & Vignare, K. (2020, May 18). Delivering high-quality instruction online in response to COVID-19: Faculty playbook. Every Learner Everywhere. https://onlinelearningconsortium.org/tools/delivering-high-quality-instruction-in-response-to-covid-19-faculty-playbook/
- Orcutt, J. M., & Dringus, L. P. (2017). Beyond being there: Practices that establish presence, engage students and influence intellectual curiosity in a structured online learning environment. Online Learning, 21(3), 15–35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i3.1231
- Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
- Skidmore, S. T., Martirosyan, N. M., Saxon, D. P., & Young, J. K. (2015). Technology tools and learner interactions in online graduate educational leadership preparation programs. In V. Vaughn, G. Miller, & Y. Oliveras-Ortiz (Eds.), Preparing future ready education leaders through globalized online learning (pp. 76–93). National Council of Professors of Educational Administration.
- Thorman, J. (2008, December 11). Should you let students lead discussion boards? Faculty Focus. https://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/online-education/should-you-let-students-lead-discussion-boards/
- Thorman, J., & Fidalgo, P. (2014). Guidelines for online course moderation and community building from a student’s perspective. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(3), 374–388. https://jolt.merlot.org/vol10no3/Thorman_0914.pdf
- Urpelainen, J. (2020, June 10). Discussion forums in online teaching: Pros and cons. ViaX. https://johannesu.com/2020/06/10/discussion-forums-in-online-teaching-pros-and-cons/
- Williams, S. S., Jaramillo, A., & Pesko, J. C. (2015). Improving depth of thinking in online discussion boards. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 16(3), 45–66. https://www.infoagepub.com/products/Quarterly-Review-of-Distance-Education-vol-16-3
- Wilson, E. (2016, May 29). Leadership in online classrooms: In eLearning, everyone is a leader. eLearning Industry. https://elearningindustry.com/leadership-in-online-classrooms-elearning-everyone-leader
- Zingaro, D. (2012). Student moderators in asynchronous online discussion: A question of questions. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 8(3), 159–173. https://jolt.merlot.org/Vol8_No3.htm