2,344
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Interaction in online postgraduate learning: what makes a good forum?

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 162-189 | Received 21 Apr 2022, Accepted 17 Nov 2022, Published online: 11 Dec 2022

References

  • Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Bures, E. M., Borokhovski, E., & Tamim, R. M. (2012). Interaction in distance education and online learning: Using evidence and theory to improve practice. In L. Moller & J. B. Huett (Eds.), The next generation of distance education: Unconstrained learning (pp. 49–69). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1785-9_4
  • Adraoui, M., Retbi, A., Idrissi, M. K., & Bennani, S. (2017). Social learning analytics to describe the learners’ interaction in online discussion forum in Moodle. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (pp. 1–6). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITHET.2017.8067817
  • Alzahrani, M. G. (2017). The effect of using online discussion forums on students’ learning. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 16(1), 164–176. http://www.tojet.net/articles/v16i1/16115.pdf
  • Anderson, T. (2003). Getting the mix right again: An updated and theoretical rationale for interaction. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v4i2.149
  • Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Borokhovski, E., Wade, C. A., Tamim, R. M., Surkes, M. A., & Bethel, E. C. (2009). A meta-analysis of three types of interaction treatments in distance education. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1243–1289. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654309333844
  • Beuchot, A., & Bullen, M. (2005). Interaction and interpersonality in online discussion forums. Distance Education, 26(1), 67–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910500081285
  • Birch, D. (2004). Participation in asynchronous online discussions for student assessment. In J. Wiley & P. Thirkell (Eds.), Marketing Accountabilities and ResponsibilitiesProceedings of the 2004 Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference (pp. 1–7). Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy.
  • Bolliger, D. U., & Martindale, T. (2004). Key factors for determining student satisfaction in online courses. International Journal on E-Learning, 3(1), 61–67. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/2226/
  • Borokhovski, E., Bernard, R. M., Tamim, R. M., Schmid, R. F., & Sokolovskaya, A. (2016). Technology-supported student interaction in post-secondary education: A meta-analysis of designed versus contextual treatments. Computers & Education, 96, 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.004
  • Borokhovski, E., Tamim, R., Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., & Sokolovskaya, A. (2012). Are contextual and designed student–student interaction treatments equally effective in distance education? Distance Education, 33(3), 311–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2012.723162
  • Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (Eds.) (2007). The SAGE Handbook of grounded theory. SAGE.
  • Chen, S. J., & Caropreso, E. J. (2004). Influence of personality on online discussion. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 3(2), 1–17. http://www.ncolr.org/issues/jiol/v3/n2/influence-of-personality-on-online-discussion.html
  • Dommett, E. (2019). Understanding student use of twitter and online forums in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 24, 325–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9776-5
  • Gerbic, P. (2006). To post or not to post: Undergraduate student perceptions about participating in online discussions. In L. Markauskaite, P. Goodyear, & P. Reimann (Eds.), Who’s learning? Whose technology?—Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (pp. 271–281). Sydney University Press. https://www.ascilite.org/conferences/sydney06/proceeding/html_abstracts/124.html
  • Ghosh, A., & Kleinberg, J. (2013). Incentivizing participation in online forums for education. In EC’13—Proceedings of the 14th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (pp. 525–542). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2482540.2482587
  • Hamann, K., Pollock, P. H., & Wilson, B. M. (2012). Assessing student perceptions of the benefits of discussions in small-group, large-class, and online learning contexts. College Teaching, 60(2), 65–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2011.633407
  • Harris, H. S., & Martin W. E. (2012). Student motivations for choosing online classes. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 6(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2012.060211
  • Ho, A., & Kember, D. (2018). Motivating the learning of part-time taught-postgraduate students through pedagogy and curriculum design: Are there differences in undergraduate teaching? International Journal of Lifelong Education, 37(3), 315–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2018.1470115
  • Ho, S. S., & McLeod, D. M. (2008). Social-psychological influences on opinion expression in face-to-face and computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 35(2), 190–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650207313159
  • Hobson, T. D., & Puruhito, K. K. (2018). Going the distance: Online course performance and motivation of distance learning students. Online Learning, 22(4), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i4.1516
  • Jahnke, J. (2010). Student perceptions of the impact of online discussion forum participation on learning outcomes. Journal of Learning Design, 3(2), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.5204/jld.v3i2.48
  • Kim, J. (2013). Influence of group size on students’ participation in online discussion forums. Computers & Education, 62, 123–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.025
  • Kirschner, P. A., & Erkens, G. (2013). Toward a framework for CSCL research. Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.750227
  • Koskey, K. L., & Benson, S. N. K. (2017). A review of literature and a model for scaffolding asynchronous student-student interaction in online discussion forums. In P. Vu, S. Fredrickson, & C. Moore (Eds.), Handbook of research on innovative pedagogies and technologies for online learning in higher education (pp. 263–280). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-1851-8
  • Lambert, J. L., & Fisher, J. L. (2013). Community of Inquiry Framework: Establishing Community in an Online Course. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 12(1), 1–16. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/153507/
  • Laurillard, D. (2013). Re-thinking university teaching: A conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies. Routledge.
  • Lewis, B. A. (2002). The effectiveness of discussion forums in on-line learning. Revista Brasileira de Aprendizagem Aberta e a Distância, 1. https://doi.org/10.17143/rbaad.v1i0.112
  • Lombardi, J., & McCahill, M. P. (2004). Enabling social dimensions of learning through a persistent, unified, massively multi-user, and self-organizing virtual environment. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Creating, Connecting and Collaborating through Computing (pp. 166–172). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. https://doi.org/10.1109/c5.2004.1314386
  • Madland, C., & Richards, G. (2016). Enhancing student-student online interaction: Exploring the study buddy peer review activity. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2179
  • Markova, T., Glazkova, I., & Zaborova, E. (2017). Quality issues of online distance learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 237, 685–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2017.02.043
  • Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning, 22(1), 205–222. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/189535/ https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092
  • Mashithoh, H., Harsasi, M., & Muzammil, M. (2014). Factors affecting student’s decision to choose accounting through distance learning system. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 3(2), 313–320. http://buscompress.com/uploads/3/4/9/8/34980536/riber_b14-149__313-320_.pdf
  • Mazzolini, M., & Maddison, S. (2003). Sage, guide or ghost? The effect of instructor intervention on student participation in online discussion forums. Computers & Education, 40(3), 237–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(02)00129-X
  • Mazzolini, M., & Maddison, S. (2007). When to jump in: The role of the instructor in online discussion forums. Computers & Education, 49(2), 193–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.06.011
  • McBrien, J. L., Cheng, R., & Jones, P. (2009). Virtual spaces: Employing a synchronous online classroom to facilitate student engagement in online learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v10i3.605
  • Mehall, S. (2020). Purposeful interpersonal interaction in online learning: What is it and how is it measured? Online Learning, 24(1), 182–204. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i1.2002
  • Menchaca, M. P., & Bekele, T. A. (2008). Learner and instructor identified success factors in distance education. Distance Education, 29(3), 231–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910802395771
  • Miyazoe, T., & Anderson, T. (2013). Interaction equivalency in an OER, MOOCS and informal learning era. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 13(2), Article 9. https://doi.org/10.5334/2013-09
  • Mokoena, S. (2013). Engagement with and participation in online discussion forums. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 12(2), 97–105. http://www.tojet.net/articles/v12i2/1229.pdf
  • Moore, J. L., Dickson-Deane, C., & Galyen, K. (2011). E-Learning, online learning, and DL environments: Are they the same? The Internet and Higher Education, 14(2), 129–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.10.001
  • Moore, M. G. (1989). Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923648909526659
  • Noble, H., & Heale, R. (2019). Triangulation in research, with examples. Evidence Based Nursing, 22(3), 67–68. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebnurs-2019-103145
  • Nunes, B. P., Tyler-Jones, M., de Campos, G. H., Siqueira, S. W. M., & Casanova, M. A. (2015). FAT: A real-time (F)orum (A)ssessment (T)ool to assist tutors with discussion forums assessment. In D. Shin (Ed.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (pp. 254–260). Association for Computing Machinery.
  • Ottewill, R. M. (2003). What’s wrong with instrumental learning? The case of business and management. Education + Training, 45(4), 189–196. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400910310478111
  • Palmer, S., Holt, D., & Bray, S. (2008). Does the discussion help? The impact of a formally assessed online discussion on final student results. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 847–858. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00780.x
  • Parker, A. (1999). Interaction in distance education: The critical conversation. AACE Journal, 1(12), 13–17. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/8117/
  • Perveen, A. (2016). Synchronous and asynchronous e-language learning: A case study of virtual University of Pakistan. Open Praxis, 8(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.8.1.212
  • Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., McNaughton Nicholls, C., & Ormston, R. (Eds.). (2014). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd.
  • Rizvi, S., Rienties, B., & Khoja, S. A. (2019). The role of demographics in online learning: A decision tree based approach. Computers & Education, 137, 32–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.04.001
  • Rovai, A. P. (2007). Facilitating online discussions effectively. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(1), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.10.001
  • Salmon, G. (2003). E-moderating: The key to teaching and learning online. Taylor & Francis.
  • Scherer Bassani, P. B. (2011). Interpersonal exchanges in discussion forums: A study of learning communities in distance learning settings. Computers & Education, 56(4), 931–938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.11.009
  • Sharif, A., & Magrill, B. (2015). Discussion forums in MOOCs. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 12(1), 119–132. https://www.ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter/article/view/368
  • Shaw, R. S. (2012). A study of the relationships among learning styles, participation types, and performance in programming language learning supported by online forums. Computers & Education, 58(1), 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.013
  • Sher, A. (2009). Assessing the relationship of student-instructor and student-student interaction to student learning and satisfaction in web-based online learning environment. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 8(2), 102–120. http://www.ncolr.org/jiol/issues/pdf/8.2.1.pdf
  • Street, H. (2010). Factors influencing a learner’s decision to drop-out or persist in higher education distance learning. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 13(4), 1–5. https://ojdla.com/archive/winter134/street134.pdf
  • Wang, W., Peslak, A., Kovacs, P., & Kovalchick, L. (2019). What really matters in online education? Issues in Information Systems, 20(1), 40–48. https://doi.org/10.48009/1_iis_2019_40-48
  • Ward, M. E., Peters, G., & Shelley, K. (2010). Student and faculty perceptions of the quality of online learning experiences. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 11(3), 57–77. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v11i3.867