Examining gains and pains of a new virtual internship design

References

• Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v5i2.1875
   Google Scholar
• Arbaugh, J. B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Diaz, S. R., Garrison, D. R., Ice, P., Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. P. (2008). Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the community of inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. The Internet and Higher Education, 11, 133–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesenbach-Lucas, S. (2003). Asynchronous discussion groups in teacher training classes: Perceptions of native and non-native students. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(3), 24–46. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v7i3.1843
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, T. (2020). Work-integrated learning placements and remote working: Experiential learning online. International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning, 21(4), 377–386. https://www.ijwil.org/files/IJWIL_21_4_377_386.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn. National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Briant, S., & Crowther, P. (2020). Reimagining internships through online experiences: Multidisciplinary engagement for creative industries students. International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning, 21(5), 617–628. https://www.ijwil.org/files/IJWIL_21_5_617_628.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Carré, P. (2012). The double dimension of self-directed learning: learners experiment with freedom. International Journal of Self-Directed Learning, 9(2), 1–10. https://www.sdlglobal.com/_files/ugd/dfdeaf_d05e6e4412904fd9b55aeba6216f78d9.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Caskurlu, S. (2018). Confirming the subdimensions of teaching, social, and cognitive presences: A construct validity study. Internet & Higher Education, 39, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheang, M. (2020). Employers’ expectations of university graduates as they transition into the workplace. European Journal of Social Science Education and Research, 7(3), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.26417/423zyk21l
   Google Scholar
• Cho, Y., & Egan, T. M. (2010). The state of the art of action learning research. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 12(2), 163–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422310367881
   Google Scholar
• Cleveland-Innes, M., Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. (2018). The community of inquiry theoretical framework: Implications for distance education and beyond. In M. G. Moore & W. C. Diehl (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (4th ed., pp. 67–78). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2017). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Di Malta, G., Bond, J., Conroy, D., Smith, K., & Moller, N. (2022). Distance education students’ mental health, connectedness and academic performance during COVID-19: A mixed-methods study. Distance Education, 43(1), 97–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2022.2029352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Embo, M. P., Driessen, E. W., Valcke, M., & Van der Vleuten, C. P. (2010). Assessment and feedback to facilitate self-directed learning in clinical practice of Midwifery students. Medical Teacher, 32(7), e263–e269. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2010.490281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, R., Huijser, H., Meth, D., & Neilan, K. (2020). Student-staff partnerships in academic development: the course design studio as a model for sustainable course-wide impact. International Journal for Academic Development, 25(2), 134–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2019.1631170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R. (2003). Cognitive presence for effective asynchronous online learning: The role of reflective inquiry, self-direction and metacognition. Elements of Quality Online Education: Practice and Direction, 4(1), 47–58. http://cordonline.net/mntutorial2/module_4/Reading%204-3%20cognitive%20presence.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R. (2009). Communities of inquiry in online learning. In P. L. Rogers, G. A. Berg, J. V. Boettcher, L. J. C. Howard, & K. D. Schenk (Eds.), Encyclopedia of distance learning (pp. 352–355). IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R. (2011). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice (2nd ed.). Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., & Akyol, Z. (2013). The community of inquiry theoretical framework. In M. G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 104–119). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
   Google Scholar
• Geng, S., Law, K. M. Y., & Niu, B. (2019). Investigating self-directed learning and technology readiness in blending learning environment. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(17), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0147-0
   Google Scholar
• Hara, N., & Kling, R. (1999). A case study of students' frustrations with a web-based distance education. First Monday, 4(12). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v4i12.710
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, K., & Bendixen, L. D. (2001). Educational research in the Internet age: Examining the role of individual characteristics. Educational Researcher, 30(9), 22–26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X030009022
   Google Scholar
• Hodges, L. D., & Martin, A. J. (2020). Enriching work-integrated learning students' opportunities online during a global pandemic (COVID-19). International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning, 21(4), 415–423. https://www.ijwil.org/files/IJWIL_21_4_415_423.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Huijser, H., Fitzgerald, R., & Salmon, G. (2020). Partnerships for scaled online learning and the unbundling of the traditional university. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(5), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.6664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulland, J. (1999). Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199902)20:2<195::AID-SMJ13>3.0.CO;2-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaider, F., Hains-Wesson, R., & Young, K. (2017). Practical typology of authentic work-integrated learning activities and assessments. Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 18(2), 153–165. https://www.ijwil.org/files/APJCE_18_2_153_165.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalid, M., Bashir, S., & Amin, H. (2020). Relationship between self-directed learning (SDL) and academic achievement of university students: A case of online distance learning and traditional universities. Bulletin of Education and Research, 42(2), 131–148. http://pu.edu.pk/images/journal/ier/PDF-FILES/9_42_2_20.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, A., & Kolb, D. (2018). Eight important things to know about the experiential learning cycle. Australian Educational Leader, 40(3), 8–14. https://www.acel.org.au/ACEL/ACELWEB/Publications/AEL/2018/3/Lead_Article_1.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Lemmetty, S., & Collin, K. (2020). Self-directed learning as a practice of workplace learning: Interpretative repertoires of self-directed learning in ICT work. Vocations and Learning, 13(1), 47–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-019-09228-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, N., Huijser, H., Xi, Y., Limniou, M., Zhang, X., & Kek, M. Y. C. A. (2022). Disrupting the disruption: A digital learning HeXie ecology model. Education Sciences, 12, Article 12020063. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12020063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, N., Wang, Q., Liu, J., & Marsick, V. (2022). Improving interdisciplinary online course design through action learning: A Chinese case study. Action Learning: Research and Practice, 19(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767333.2021.2002681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, H. B. (2009). Trends in self-directed learning research paradigms. In M. G. Derrick & M. K. Ponton (Eds.), Emerging directions in self-directed learning (pp. 19–36). Discovery Association Publishing House.
   Google Scholar
• Maltbia, T. E., & Marsick, V. (2008, February 20–24). Using structured conversations to develop reflective practice skills [Paper presentation]. 2008 AHRD International Research Conference in the Americas, Panama City, FL, United States of America.
   Google Scholar
• Marquardt, M. J., Leonard, H. S., Feedman, A. M., & Hill, C. C. (2009). Action learning for developing leaders and organizations: Principles, strategies, and cases. American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, S. L., & Piety, P. J. (2022). Online learning ecosystems: comprehensive planning and support for distance learners. Distance Education, 43(2), 179–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2022.2064820
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niels Bech, L., Pedersen, A., Nielsen, A., Wahl, C., & Sorensen, E. K. (2014). Digital education with IT: How to create motivational and inclusive education in blended learning environments using flipped learning: A study in nurse education. In R. Ørngreen & K. Tweddell Levinsen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on e-Learning (pp. 305–312). Academic Conferences Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neil, J., & Marsick, V. J. (2007). Understanding action learning. AMACOM.
   Google Scholar
• Pedler, M., Hauser, B, & Caulat, G. (2014). Reflections on working with virtual action learning. Action Learning: Research and Practice, 11(1), 88–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767333.2013.874776
   Google Scholar
• Petrides, L. A. (2002). Web-based technologies for distributed (or distance) learning: Creating learning-centered educational experiences in the higher education classroom. International Journal of Instructional Media, 29(1), 69–77. https://www.iskme.org/file?n=Web-Based-Technologies-for-Distributed-Learning-in-Higher-Education-Classrooms&id=929
   Google Scholar
• Rand, J. (2016, 5–6 July). Action learning workshop – creating and sustaining a learning conversation [Paper presentation]. Value and Virtue Conference 2016, York St John University, York, United Kingdom.
   Google Scholar
• Revans, R. (2017). ABC of action learning. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, M., & Rusznyak, L. (2020). Learning to teach without school-based experience: Conundrums and possibilities in a South African context. Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(4), 517–527. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2020.1800408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen Gupta, T., Hays, R., Woolley, T., Kelly, G., & Jacobs, H. (2014, Jun). Workplace immersion in the final year of an undergraduate medicine course: The views of final year students and recent graduates. Medical Teacher, 36(6), 518–526. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2014.907878
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skipton Leonard, H., & Lang, F. (2010). Leadership development via action learning. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 12(2), 225–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422310367800
   Google Scholar
• Song, L., & Hill, J. R. (2007). A conceptual model for understanding self-directed learning in online environments. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 6(1), 27–42. https://www.ncolr.org/jiol/issues/pdf/6.1.3.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Teo, T., Tan, S. C., Lee, C. B., Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., Chen, W. L., & Cheah, H. M. (2010). The self-directed learning with technology scale (SDLTS) for young students: An initial development and validation. Computers & Education, 55, 1764–1771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volz-Peacock, M., Carson, B., & Marquardt, M. (2016). Action learning and leadership development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 18(3), 318–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422316645884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vonderwell, S. (2003). An examination of asynchronous communication experiences and perspectives of students in an online course: A case study. The Internet and Higher Education, 6(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(02)00164-1
   Google Scholar
• Walton, M., & Elliott, S. (2006). Improving safety and quality: How can education help? The Medical Journal of Australia, 184(10), 60–64. https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00365.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Q., Xiong, C., & Liu, J. (2021). Does culture or self-directed learning drive online performance? International Journal of Educational Management, 35(6), 1077–1098. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-06-2020-0327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, Y. I., Zegwaard, K. E., & Fox-Turnbull, W. (2020). Conventional, remote, virtual and simulated work-integrated learning: A meta-analysis of existing practice. International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning, 21(4), 331–354. https://www.ijwil.org/files/IJWIL_21_4_331_354.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Zegwaard, K. E., Pretti, T. J., & Rowe, A. D. (2020). Responding to an international crisis: The adaptability of the practice of work-integrated learning. International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning, 21(4), 317–330. https://www.ijwil.org/files/IJWIL_21_4_317_330.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, K., & Peck, K. (2003). The effects of peer-controlled or moderated online collaboration on group problem solving and related attitudes. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology/La revue canadienne de l’apprentissage et de la technologie, 29(3). https://doi.org/10.21432/T2HS43
   Google Scholar
• Zimmer, B. (2008). Using the interpersonal action-learning cycle to invite thinking, attentive comprehension. In R. Luppicini (Ed.), Handbook of conversation design for instructional applications (pp. 264–288). IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Zuber-Skerritt, O. (2015). Participatory action learning and action research (PALAR) for community engagement: A theoretical framework. Educational Research for Social Change, 4(1), 5–25. http://ersc.nmmu.ac.za/articles/Vol_4_No_1_Zuber-Skerrit_pp_5-25_April_2015.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar