CONNECT: a framework for building effective working relationships with distance education doctoral students and their advisers

References

• Ames, C., Berman, R., & Casteel, A. (2018). A preliminary examination of doctoral student retention factors in private online workspaces. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 13, 79–107. https://doi.org/10.28945/3958
   Google Scholar
• Andrew, M. (2012). Supervising doctorates at a distance: Three trans‐Tasman stories. Quality Assurance in Education, 20(1), 42–53. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684881211198239
   Google Scholar
• Australian Qualifications Framework Council. (2013). The Australian Qualifications framework. https://www.aqf.edu.au/framework/australian-qualifications-framework
   Google Scholar
• Brown, C. G. (2017). The persistence and attrition of online learners. School Leadership Review, 12(1). https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/slr/vol12/iss1/7
   Google Scholar
• Conrad, L. (2012). Countering isolation: joining the research community. In C. J. Denholm & T. D. Evans (Eds.), Doctorates downunder: Keys to successful doctoral study in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand (2nd ed.). ACER Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, P., Henderson, M., Mahoney, P., Phillips, M., Ryan, T., Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2019). What makes for effective feedback: Staff and student perspectives. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1467877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deshpande, A. (2016). A qualitative examination of challenges influencing doctoral students in an online doctoral program. International Education Studies, 9(6), 139–149. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n6p139
   Google Scholar
• Drury, V., Francis, K., & Chapman, Y. (2006). Walking the void: Being a rural PhD candidate. Australian Journal of Rural Health, 14(5), 233–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1584.2006.00816.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Erichsen, E. A., Bolliger, D. U., & Halupa, C. (2014). Student satisfaction with graduate supervision in doctoral programs primarily delivered in distance education settings. Studies in Higher Education, 39(2), 321–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2012.709496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, M. A., & Crosta, L. (2019). New perspectives in online doctoral supervision: A systematic literature review. Studies in Continuing Education, 41(2), 173–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2018.1532405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, M., Phillips, M., Ryan, T., Boud, D., Dawson, P., Molloy, E., & Mahoney, P. (2019). Conditions that enable effective feedback. Higher Education Research & Development, 38(7), 1401–1416. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1657807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janta, H., Lugosi, P., & Brown, L. (2014). Coping with loneliness: A netnographic study of doctoral students. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 38(4), 553–571. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2012.726972
   Google Scholar
• Jiranek, V. (2010). Potential predictors of timely completion among dissertation reserach students at an Australian faculty of sciences. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 5. http://ijds.org/Volume5/IJDSv5p001-013Jiranek273.pdf https://doi.org/10.28945/709
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, S., & Coe, C. (2017). Mentoring and student support in online doctoral programs. American Journal of Distance Education, 31(2), 128–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2017.1300464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, S., & Johnson, M. (2017). Mentoring doctoral students online: Mentor strategies and challenges. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 25(2), 202–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2017.1326693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, S., & Johnson, M. (2019). Online mentoring of dissertations: The role of structure and support. Studies in Higher Education, 44(1), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1337736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, S., Johnson, M., & Hardemon, T. (2013). Dissertations at a distance: Students’ perceptions of online mentoring in a doctoral program. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 27(1), 1–11. https://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/835
   Google Scholar
• Lechuga, V. M. (2011). Faculty-graduate student mentoring relationships: Mentors’ perceived roles and responsibilities. Higher Education, 62, 757–771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mantai, L. (2019). ‘A source of sanity’: The role of social support for doctoral candidates' belonging and becoming. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 14, 367–382. https://doi.org/10.28945/4275
   Google Scholar
• Nasiri, F., & Mafakheri, F. (2015). Postgraduate research supervision at a distance: A review of challenges and strategies. Studies in Higher Education, 40(10), 1962–1969. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.914906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieto, A. (2016). Essential e-mentors’ characteristics for mentoring online doctoral dissertations: Faculty views. Journal of Psychological Issues in Organizational Culture, 6(4), 35–68. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpoc.21204
   Google Scholar
• Peltonen, J. A., Vekkaila, J., Rautio, P., Haverinen, K., & Pyhalto, K. (2017). Doctoral students' social support profiles and their relationship to burnout, drop-out intentions, and time to candidacy. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 12, 157–173. https://doi.org/10.28945/3792
   Google Scholar
• Rigler, K. L., Bowlin, L. K., Sweat, K., Watts, S., & Throne, R. (2017, October 14–17). Agency, socialization, and support: A critical review of doctoral student attrition [Paper presentation]. The 3rd International Conference on Doctoral Education, Orlando, FL, United States of America.
   Google Scholar
• Rockinson-Szapkiw, A. (2019). Toward understanding factors salient to doctoral students’ persistence: The development and preliminary validation of the Doctoral Academic-Family Integration Inventory. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 14, 237–258. https://doi.org/10.28945/4248
   Google Scholar
• Rockinson-Szapkiw, A. J., Spaulding, L. S., & Spaulding, M. T. (2016). Identifying significant integration and institutional factors that predict online doctoral persistence. The Internet and Higher Education, 31, 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roumell, E. A. L., & Bolliger, D. U. (2017). Experiences of faculty with doctoral student supervision in programs delivered via distance. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 65(2), 82–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/07377363.2017.1320179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sverdlik, A., Hall, N., McAlpine, L., & Hubbard, K. (2018). The PhD experience: A review of the factors influencing doctoral students' completion, achievement and well-being. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 13, 361–388. https://doi.org/10.28945/4113
   Google Scholar
• Tweedie, M. G., Clark, S., Johnson, R. C., & Kay, D. W. (2013). The ‘dissertation marathon’ in doctoral distance education. Distance Education, 34(3), 379–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2013.835778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volkert, D., Candela, L., & Bernacki, M. (2018). Student motivation, stressors, and intent to leave nursing doctoral study: A national study using path analysis. Nurse Education Today, 61, 210–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2017.11.033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar