The effects of politeness in shaping discourse in online debates

References

• Asterhan, C. S., & Schwarz, B. B. (2016). Argumentation for learning: Well-trodden paths and unexplored territories. Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 164–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1155458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakeman, R. & Gottman, J. (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, M. J., Andriessen, J., & Schwarz, B. B. (2019). Collaborative argumentation-based learning. In The Routledge international handbook of research on dialogic education (pp. 76–88). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Banna, J., Lin, M., Stewart, M., & Fialkowski, M. (2015). Interaction matters: Strategies to promote engaged learning in an online introductory nutrition course. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 11(2), 249–261.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage (Vol. 4). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brummernhenrich, B., Baker, M. J., Bietti, L. M., Détienne, F., & Jucks, R. (2021). Being (un)safe together: Student group dynamics, face work and argumentation. In F. Maine & M. Vrikki (Eds.), Dialogue for intercultural understanding (pp. 119–134). Springer. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-71778-0_9
   Google Scholar
• Chang, J. P., Chiam, C., Fu, L., Wang, A., Zhang, J., & Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, C. (2020). ConvoKit: A toolkit for the analysis of conversations. In Proceedings of the 21th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue, 57–60, Association for Computational Linguistics, 1st virtual meeting. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.sigdial-1.8
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C. H., & She, H. C. (2012). The impact of recurrent on-line synchronous scientific argumentation on students’ argumentation and conceptual change. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15(1), 197–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X., Zhai, X., Zhu, Y., & Li, Y. (2022). Exploring debaters and audiences’ depth of critical thinking and its relationship with their participation in debate activities. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, M. M., & Khoo, L. (2003). Impoliteness and status effects during group problem solving: Do they bias evaluations and reduce the likelihood of correct solutions? Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(3), 506. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.3.506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, M. M., Oh, Y. W., Kim, J. N., & Cionea, I. A. (2022). Serving the greater social good for personal gain: effects of polite disagreements in online debates. Communication Research, 49(3), 451–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502211053456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, C., Sudhof, M., Jurafsky, D., Leskovec, J., & Potts, C. (2013). A computational approach to politeness with application to social factors. In Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume. 1: Long Papers) (pp. 250–259). Association for Computational Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, M., & Barnett, R. (Eds.). (2015). The Palgrave handbook of critical thinking in higher education. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• De Kock, C., & Vlachos, A. (2021). I beg to differ: A study of constructive disagreement in online conversations. In Proceedings of the 16th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Main Volume, 2017–2027, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• De Marneffe, M. C., MacCartney, B., & Manning, C. D. (2006). Generating typed dependency parses from phrase structure parses. In Lrec, 6, 449–454.
   Google Scholar
• DiPasquale, J., & Hunter, W. (2018). Critical thinking in asynchronous online discussions: A systematic review. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 44(2).
   Google Scholar
• Fehrman, S., & Watson, S. L. (2021). A systematic review of asynchronous online discussions in online higher education. American Journal of Distance Education, 35(3), 200–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2020.1858705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foo, S. Y., & Quek, C. L. (2019). Developing students’ critical thinking through asynchronous online discussions: A literature review. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 7(2), 37–58. https://doi.org/10.17220/mojet.2019.02.003
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Fung, T. S. (2010). Exploring causal relationships among teaching, cognitive and social presence: Student perceptions of the community of inquiry framework. Internet and Higher Education, 13(1–2), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtgraves, T. (1997). Yes, but… positive politeness in conversation arguments. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 16(2), 222–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X970162006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe, C., & Zachariou, A. (2019). Small-group collaboration and individual knowledge acquisition: The processes of growth during adolescence and early adulthood. Learning and Instruction, 60, 263–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isohätälä, J., Näykki, P., Järvelä, S., & Baker, M. J. (2018). Striking a balance: Socio-emotional processes during argumentation in collaborative learning interaction. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 16, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2017.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong, A. (2005b). A guide to analyzing message–response sequences and group interaction patterns in computer-mediated communication. Distance Education, 26(3), 367–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910500291470
   Google Scholar
• Jeong, A. C. (2006). The effects of conversational language on group interaction and group performance in computer-supported collaborative argumentation. Instructional Science, 34(5), 367–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-006-0002-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong, A. C. (2005a). Discussion analysis tool. http://myweb.fsu.edu/ajeong
   Google Scholar
• Larrain, A., Freire, P., López, P., & Grau, V. (2019). Counter-arguing during curriculum-supported peer interaction facilitates middle-school students’ science content knowledge. Cognition and Instruction, 37(4), 453–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2019.1627360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, S., Kraut, R. E., Yu, J. A., Altenburger, K. M., & Wang, Y. C. (2022). Understanding conflicts in online conversations. In Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022 (pp. 2592–2602). https://doi.org/10.1145/3485447.3512131
   Google Scholar
• Li, X., Li, Y., Hu, W., Li, K., & Gao, L. (2023). More socio-emotional regulation, more effective? Exploring social regulation of learning in collaborative argumentation among the high and low performing groups. Metacognition and Learning, 18(1), 261–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-022-09329-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Q. T., Liu, B. W., & Lin, Y. R. (2019). The influence of prior knowledge and collaborative online learning environment on students’ argumentation in descriptive and theoretical scientific concept. International Journal of Science Education, 41(2), 165–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1545100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, J., Chiu, M. M., & Law, N. (2010). Effects of on-line collaborative argumentation processes on justifications. In K. Gomez, L. Lyons, & J. Radinsky (Eds.), Learning in the disciplines: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS 2010) - Volume 1, Full Papers (pp. 207–214). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online learning, 22(1), 205–222. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMurdo, G. (1995). Netiquettes for networkers. Journal of Information Science, 21, 305–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/016555159502100407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menekse, M., & Chi, M. T. (2019). The role of collaborative interactions versus individual construction on students’ learning of engineering concepts. European Journal of Engineering Education, 44(5), 702–725. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2018.1538324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mistretta, S. (2021). The new netiquette: Choosing civility in an age of online teaching and learning. International Journal on E-Learning, 20(3), 323–345.
   Google Scholar
• Oyarzun, B., & Martin, F. (2023). A systematic review of research on online learner collaboration from 2012-21: Collaboration technologies, design, facilitation, and outcomes. Online Learning, 27(1), 71–106. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i1.3407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapanta, C., & Felton, M. K. (2022). Learning to argue through dialogue: A review of instructional approaches. Educational Psychology Review, 34, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09637-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheuermann, L., &Taylor, G. (1997). Netiquette. International Research, 7, 269–273. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662249710187268
   Google Scholar
• Shea, V., & Shea, C. (1994). Netiquette. Albion Books.
   Google Scholar
• Soler-Costa, R., Lafarga-Ostáriz, P., Mauri-Medrano, M., & Moreno-Guerrero, A. J. (2021). Netiquette: Ethic, education, and behavior on internet—a systematic literature review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(3), 1212. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18031212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wikle, J. S., & West, R. E. (2019). An analysis of discussion forum participation and student learning outcomes. International Journal on E-Learning, 18(2), 205–228.
   Google Scholar
• Xie, K., Miller, N. C., & Allison, J. R. (2013). Toward a social conflict evolution model: Examining the adverse power of conflictual social interaction in online learning. Computers & Education, 63, 404–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar