Temporal-spatial and pedagogical flexibility in distance education

References

• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, S. A., & Yucedag-Ozcan, A. (2013). Educational persistence: Self-efficacy and topics in a college orientation course. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 14(4), 451–465. https://doi.org/10.2190/CS.14.4.b
   Google Scholar
• Chen, D.-T. (2003). Uncovering the provisos behind flexible learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 6(2), 25–30. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/jeductechsoci.6.2.25.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collis, B. (1998). New didactics in university instruction: why and how. Computers & Education, 31(4), 373–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(98)00040-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collis, B., & Moonen, J. (2002). Flexible learning in a digital world. Open learning. The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 17(3), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/0268051022000048228
   Google Scholar
• Dalsgaard, C., & Paulsen, M. F. (2009). Transparency in cooperative online education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10(3). Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v10i3.671
   Google Scholar
• Fern, E. F. (2001). Advanced focus group research. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gärdén, C. (2010). Verktyg för lärande: informationssökning och informationsanvändning i kommunal vuxenutbildning [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Borås and Gothenburg University.
   Google Scholar
• Hodges, C. B., Moore, S., Lockee, B. B., Trust, T., & Bond, M. A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning
   Google Scholar
• Holmqvist, D., Fejes, A., & Nylander, E. (2021). Auctioning out education: On exogenous privatization through public procurement. European Educational Research Journal, 20(1), 102–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904120953281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houlden, S., & Veletsianos, G. (2019). A posthumanist critique of flexible online learning and its “anytime anyplace” claims. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(3), 1005–1018. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houlden, S., & Veletsianos, G. (2021). The problem with flexible learning: Neoliberalism, freedom, and learner subjectivities. Learning, Media and Technology, 46(2), 144–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1833920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, R., & Beattie, K. (1996). Postgraduate coursework beyond the classroom: Issues in implementing flexible delivery. Distance Education, 17(2), 355–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158791960170209
   Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. (1993). Quality control in focus group research. In: D. L. Morgan (Ed.), Successful Focus Groups: Advancing the State of the Art (pp. 65–86). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483349008
   Google Scholar
• Lockee, B. B., & Clark-Stallkamp, R. (2022). Pressure on the system: Increasing flexible learning through distance education. Distance Education, 43(2), 342–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2022.2064829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, M. G. (1989). Editorial: Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923648909526659
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M. G. (1997). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical Principles of Distance Education (pp. 22–38). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M. G. (2001). Editorial: Surviving as a distance teacher. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(2), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527080
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. L. (1997). Focus groups as qualitative research. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mufic, J. (2023). ‘And suddenly it’s not so flexible anymore!’ Discursive effects in comments from school leaders and staff about distance education. Studies in the Education of Adults, 56(1), 102–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/02660830.2023.2249141
   Google Scholar
• Muhrman, K., & Andersson, P. (2022). Adult education in Sweden in the wake of marketisation. Studies in the Education of Adults, 54(1), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/02660830.2021.1984060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naidu, S. (2017). Openness and flexibility are the norm, but what are the challenges? Distance Education, 38(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2017.1297185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naidu, S. (1997). Collaborative reflective practice: An instructional design architecture for the internet. Distance Education, 18(2), 257–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158791970180206
   Google Scholar
• Paulsen, M. F. (1992). From bulletin boards to electronic universities: Distance education, computer-mediated communication, and online education. The American Center for the Study of Distance Education, Pennsylvania State University.
   Google Scholar
• Samarawickrema, R. G. (2005). Determinants of student readiness for flexible learning: Some preliminary findings. Distance Education, 26(1), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910500081277
   Google Scholar
• SFS. (2010:800). Skollag [Education act]. Utbildningsdepartementet [Ministry of Education]. https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-och-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/skollag-2010800_sfs-2010-800/
   Google Scholar
• Swedish National Agency for Education. (2017). Läroplan för vuxenutbildningen [Curriculum for adult education]. https://www.skolverket.se/undervisning/vuxenutbildningen/komvux-gymnasial/laroplan-for-vux-och-amnesplaner-for-komvux-gymnasial/laroplan-lvux12-for-vuxenutbildningen
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837–851. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410383121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valcke, M. M. A., & Martens, R. L. (1997). An interactive learning and course development environment: Context, theoretical and empirical considerations. Distance Education, 18(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158791970180103
   Google Scholar
• Van Alten, D. C., Phielix, C., Janssen, J., & Kester, L. (2019). Effects of flipping the classroom on learning outcomes and satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 28, 100281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veletsianos, G., & Houlden, S. (2019). An analysis of flexible learning and flexibility over the last 40 years of Distance Education. Distance Education, 40(4), 454–468. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2019.1681893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar