Reconceptualising critical digital literacy

References

• Alvermann, D. (2004). Media, information communication technologies, and youth literacies. The American Behavioural Scientist, 48(1), 78–83. doi:10.1177/0002764204267271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apple, M. (2013). Can education change society? New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Area, M., & Pessoa, T. (2012). From solid to liquid. Scientific Journal of Media Education, 38(XIX), 13–20.
   Google Scholar
• Avila, J., & Pandya, J. Z. (2013). Critical digital literacies as social praxis. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Boler, M. (1999). Feeling power. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, D. (2014). It's complicated. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buckingham, D. (2003). Media education. Cambridge and Malden, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burnett, C., & Merchant, G. (2011). Is there a space for critical literacy in the context of social media? English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 10(1), 41–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chase, Z., & Laufenberg, D. (2011). Embracing the squishiness of digital literacy. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 54(7), 535–537. doi:10.1598/JAAL.54.7.7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coiro, J., Knobel, M., Lankshear, C., & Leu, D. T. (2008). Central issues in new literacies ad new literacies research. In J. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear, & D. T. Leu (Eds.), Handbook of research on new literacies (pp. 1–21). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, C. (2014). Social media. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Galloway, A. (2011). Are some things unrepresentable? Theory, Culture and Society, 28(7–8), 85–102. doi:10.1177/0263276411423038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardiner, B. (2014). Adding coding to the curriculum. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/24/world/europe/adding-coding-to-the-curriculum.html
   Google Scholar
• Gauntlett, D. (2011). Making is connection. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Green, B. (1988). Subject specific literacy and school learning. Australian Journal of Education, 32(2), 156–179. doi:10.1177/000494418803200203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, B. (2002). A literacy project of our own? English in Australia, 44(3), 25–32.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhow, C., & Robelia, B. (2009). Informal learning and identity formation in online social networks. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 119–140. doi:10.1080/17439880902923580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honn, J. (2013). Never neutral. London, ON: Western University.
   Google Scholar
• Janks, H. (2000). Domination, access, diversity and design. Educational Review, 52(2), 176–186. doi:10.1080/713664035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janks, H. (2010). Literacy and power. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H. (2006). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Macarthur Foundation White Paper. Cambridge, MA and London: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H. (2008). Convergence culture. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R. H., & Hafner, C. A. (2012). Understanding digital literacies. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kellner, D. (2001). New technologies/new literacies: Reconstructing education for the new millennium. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 11, 67–81. doi:10.1023/A:1011270402858
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kress, G. (1997). Visual and verbal modes of representation in electronically mediated communication: the potentials of new forms of text. In I. Snyder (Ed.), Page to screen: Taking literacy into the electronic era (pp. 53–79). St Leonards: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2011). New Literacies (3rd ed.). Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lash, S. (2002). Critique of information. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S. (2013). Media research and policy in Europe: A review of recent current and planned activities. In M. Bulger & S. Livingstone (Eds.), Report of a meeting of the COST action: Transforming audiences, transforming societies (pp. 1–36). Brussels: Saint-Louis.
   Google Scholar
• Lovink, G., & Rossiter, N. (2005). Dawn of the organised networks. Fibreculture Journal (5). Retrieved from http://five.fibreculturejournal.org/fcj-029-dawn-of-the-organised-networks/
   Google Scholar
• Luke, A. (2000). Critical literacy in Australia. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 43(5), 448–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manovich, L. (2013). Software takes command. New York and London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Masterman, L. (1985). Teaching the media. London: Comedia.
   Google Scholar
• Meyers, E. M., Erickson, I., & Small, R. V. (2013). Digital literacy and informal learning. Learning, Media and Technology, 38(4), 355–367. doi:10.1080/17439884.2013.783597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misson, R., & Morgan, W. (2006). Critical literacy and the aesthetic. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
   Google Scholar
• Pool, C. R. (1997). A new digital literacy. Educational Leadership, 55(3), 6–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, J. (2012). Digital media and learner identity. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, J., & Banaji, S. (2011). Social media and self-curatorship. Comunicar, 38, 83–91.
   Google Scholar
• Readman, M. (2013). Not ‘philosphy of media education’ but ‘media education as philosophy’. In P. Fraser & J. Wardle (Eds.), Current perspectives in media education (pp. 160–174). Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sefton-Green, J. (1998). Digital diversions. London: UCL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. (2014). Distrusting educational technology. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sheridan, M. P., & Rowsell, J. (2010). Design literacies: Learning and innovation in the digital age. Great Britain: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tate, S. (2011). Equity and access through literacy development and instruction: The use of critical text to transform student writing and identity within a research seminar. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 10(1), 199–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, P. A. (2006). Putting the critique back into a critique of information. Information, Communication & Society, 9(5), 553–571. doi:10.1080/13691180600965518
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, P. A., & Ruiz, N. (2007). Zizek! A conversation with Paul A. Taylor. Kritikos, 4. Retrieved from http://intertheory.org/taylorandruiz.htm
   Google Scholar
• The New London Group (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorne, S. L. (2013). Digital literacies. In M. R. Hawkins (Ed.), Framing languages and literacies (pp. 192–218). New York and London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• van den Boomen, M. (2014). Transcoding the digital. Amsterdam: Institute of Network Cultures.
   Google Scholar
• Wark, M. (2013). A more lovingly made world. Cultural Studies Review, 19(1), 296–304.
   Google Scholar