1,689
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Social justice and technocracy: tracing the narratives of inclusive education in the USA

References

  • Ainscow, M., Booth, T., & Dyson, A. (2006). Inclusion and the standards agenda: Negotiating policy pressures in England. Special issue: International Inclusive Education Colloquium: critical analyses of inclusive education policy: an international survey. (Part 2). International Journal of Inclusive Education, 10, 295–308. doi:10.1080/13603110500430633
  • Akin, W. E. (1977). Technocracy and the American dream. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  • Albrecht, G. L., Seelman, K. D., & Bury, M. (2001). Handbook of disability studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Apple, M. W. (2004). Creating difference: Neo-liberalism, neo-conservatism and the politics of educational reform. Educational Policy, 18, 12–44. doi:10.1177/0895904803260022
  • Armstrong, A. C., Armstrong, D., & Spandagou, I. (2009). Inclusive education: International policy and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Artiles, A. J., Harris-Murri, N., & Rostenberg, D. (2006). Inclusion as social justice: Critical notes on discourses, assumptions, and the road ahead. Theory Into Practice, 45, 260–268. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4503_8
  • Avramidis, E., Bayliss, P., & Burden, R. (2000). A survey into mainstream teachers’ attitudes towards the inclusion of children with special educational needs in the ordinary school in one local education authority. Educational Psychology, 20, 191–211. doi:10.1080/713663717
  • Barnes, C., Oliver, M., & Barton, L. (2002). Disability studies today. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Bell, D. (1973). The coming of post-industrial society: A venture in social forecasting. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Biklen, D., & Burke, J. (2006). Presuming competence. Equity & Excellence in Education, 39, 166–175. doi:10.1080/10665680500540376
  • Bogdan, R., & Taylor, S. J. (1994). The social meaning of mental retardation: Two life stories. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Bolton, C. L. (2011). Metanoia in educational leadership: An alternative perspective for school leadership. In F. W. English (Ed.), Sage handbook of educational leadership: Advances in theory, research, and practice (2nd ed., pp. 223–232). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Brantlinger, E. (1994). High-income and low-income adolescents’ views of special education. Journal of Adolescent Research, 9(3), 384–408. doi:10.1177/074355489493006
  • Brantlinger, E. (1997). Using ideology: Cases of non-recognition of the politics of research and practice in special education. Review of Educational Research, 67(4), 425–459. doi: 10.3102/00346543067004425
  • Brantlinger, E. (2001). Poverty, class, and disability: A historical, social, and political perspective. Focus on Exceptional Children, 33(7), 1–19.
  • Brantlinger, E. (2005). Who benefits from special education? Remediating (fixing) other people's children. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Burke, K., & Sutherland, C. (2004). Attitudes toward inclusion: Knowledge vs. experience. Education, 125, 163–172.
  • Centeno, M. A. (1993). The new Leviathan: The dynamics and limits of technocracy. Theory and Society, 22, 307–335. doi:10.1007/BF00993531
  • Clarence, E. (2002). Technocracy reinvented: The new evidence-based policy movement. Public Policy and Administration, 17(3), 1–11. doi:10.1177/095207670201700301
  • Connor, D. J., & Ferri, B. A. (2010). Learning disabilities (special issue). Disability Studies Quarterly, 30(2). Retrieved from http://dsq-sds.org/issue/view/46 doi: 10.18061/dsq.v30i2.1229
  • Cremin, L. (1961). The transformation of the school: Progressivism in American education, 1876–1957. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.
  • Crites, S. (1971). The narrative quality of experience. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 39, 291–311. doi:10.1093/jaarel/XXXIX.3.291
  • Crow, G. M. (2012). Critical-Constructivist perspective on mentoring and coaching for leadership. In S. Fletcher & C. A. Mullen (Eds.), Sage handbook of mentoring and coaching in education (pp. 228–243). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Data Accountability Center. (2010). Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) data. United States Department of Education. Retrieved from http://www.ideadata.org/PartBData.asp
  • Davis, L. J. (Ed.). (1997). The disability studies reader. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Davis, L. J. (2002). Bending over backwards: Disability, dismodernism & other difficult positions. New York, NY: New York University Press.
  • Dewey, J. (1976a). Individuality, equality, and superiority. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The middle works, 1899–1924 (Vol. 13, pp. 295–300). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
  • Dewey, J. (1976b). Mediocrity and individuality. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The middle works, 1899–1924 (Vol. 13, pp. 289–294). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
  • Elledge, A., Le Floch, K. C., Taylor, J., & Anderson, L. (2009). State and local implementation of the ‘No Child Left Behind Act’: Volume V – Implementation of the 1 percent rule and 2 percent interim policy options. Washington, WA: United States Department of Education.
  • Fink, D. (2005). Leadership for mortals: Developing and sustaining leaders of learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Fischer, F. (1990). Technocracy and the politics of expertise. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Fleischer, D. Z., & Zames, F. (2011). The disability rights movement: From charity to confrontation (updated ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
  • Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Seabury.
  • Freire, P. (1972). Education for critical consciousness. New York, NY: Optimum.
  • Gabel, S. (2005). Disability studies in education: Readings in theory and method. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
  • Gabel, S., & Peters, S. (2004). Presage of a paradigm shift? Beyond the social model of disability toward resistance theories of disability. Disability & Society, 19, 585–600. doi:10.1080/0968759042000252515
  • Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Hampton, G. (2011). Narrative policy analysis and the use of the meta-narrative in participatory policy development within higher education. Higher Education Policy, 24, 347–358. doi:10.1057/hep.2011.8
  • Hardman, M. L., & Dawson, S. (2008). The impact of federal public policy on curriculum & instruction for students with disabilities in the general classroom. Preventing School Failure, 52, 5–11. doi:10.3200/PSFL.52.2.5-11
  • Harry, B., & Anderson, M. G. (1994). The disproportionate placement of African American males in special education programs: A critique of the process. The Journal of Negro Education, 63(4), 602–619. doi: 10.2307/2967298
  • Harry, B., Klingner, J. K., Sturges, K. M., & Moore, R. F. (2002). Of rocks and soft places: Using qualitative methods to investigate disproportionality. In D. Losen & G. Orfield (Eds.), Racial inequity in special education (pp. 71–92). Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University and the Harvard Education Press.
  • Hehir, T. (2005). New directions in special education: Eliminating ableism in policy and practice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education.
  • Howard, G. (1991). Culture tales: A narrative approach to thinking, cross-cultural psychology, and psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 46, 187–197. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.46.3.187
  • Kamens, M. W., Loprete, S. J., & Slostad, F. A. (2000). Classroom teachers’ perceptions about inclusion and preservice teacher education. Teaching Education, 11, 147–158. doi:10.1080/713698971
  • Kleinert, H., Kearns, J., & Kennedy, S. (1997). Accountability for all students: Kentucky's Alternate Portfolio system for students with moderate and severe cognitive disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 22, 88–101. doi:10.1177/154079699702200206
  • Kliewer, C. (1998). Schooling children with Down Syndrome: Toward an understanding of possibility. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Linton, S. (1998). Claiming disability: Knowledge and identity. New York, NY: New York University Press.
  • Lipsky, D. K., & Gartner, A. (1996). Inclusion, school restructuring, and the remaking of American society. Harvard Educational Review, 66(4), 762–797. doi: 10.17763/haer.66.4.3686k7x734246430
  • Losen, D., & Orfield, G. (Eds.). (2002). Racial inequity in special education. Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University and the Harvard Education Press.
  • Martin, J. (2002). The education of John Dewey: A biography. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  • McBeth, M. K., Shanahan, E. A., & Hathaway, P. L. (2007). The intersection of narrative policy analysis and policy change theory. Policy Studies Journal, 35, 87–108. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2007.00208.x
  • McCulloch, G. (2002). Philosophers and kings: Education for leadership in modern England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • McLaren, P. (1998). Life in schools: An introduction to critical pedagogy in the foundations of education. White Plains, NY: Longman.
  • Meynaud, J. (1969). Technocracy. New York, NY: Free Press.
  • Nagle, K., Yunker, C., & Malmgren, K. W. (2006). Students with disabilities and accountability reform: Challenges identified at the state and local levels. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 17, 28–39. doi:10.1177/10442073060170010301
  • Oliver, M. (1990). The politics of disablement. London: MacMillan.
  • Osgood, R. L. (2005). The history of inclusion in the United States. Washington, WA: Gallaudet University Press.
  • Pelka, F. (1997). The ABC-CLIO companion to the disability rights movement. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
  • Phillips, D. C. (1983). After the wake: Postpositivistic educational thought. Educational Researcher, 12(5), 4–12. doi:10.3102/0013189X012005004
  • Phillips, D. C., & Burbules, N. C. (2000). Postpositivism and educational research. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Picciano, A. G., & Spring, J. (2012). The great American education-industrial complex: Ideology, technology, and profit. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Putnam, R. D. (1977). Elite transformation in advanced industrial societies: An empirical assessment of the theory of technocracy. Comparative Political Studies, 10, 383–412. doi:10.1177/001041407701000305
  • Ravitch, D. (2010). The death and life of the great American school system: How testing and choice are undermining education. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Roe, E. (1994). Narrative policy analysis: Theory and practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Ryan, A. (1997). John Dewey and the high tide of American liberalism. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
  • Saltman, K. J., & Gabbard, D. A. (2010). Education as enforcement: The militarization and corporatization of schools. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Sapon-Shevin, M. (1999). Because we can change the world: A practical guide to building cooperative, inclusive classroom communities. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Sapon-Shevin, M. (2003). Inclusion: A matter of social justice – How can we create schools that will help students thrive in a diverse society?. Education Leadership, 61(2), 25–28.
  • Savarese, E. T., & Savarese, R. J. (2010). Autism and the concept of neurodiversity (special issue). Disability Studies Quarterly, 30(1). Retrieved from http://dsq-sds.org/issue/view/43
  • Scott, H. (1933). Introduction to technocracy. New York, NY: John Day Company.
  • Segal, H. P. (1985). Technological utopianism in American culture. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
  • Shapiro, J. P. (1994). No pity: People with disabilities forging a new civil rights movement. New York, NY: Times Books.
  • Skiba, R. J., Poloni-Staudinger, L., Gallini, S., Simmons, A. B., & Feggins-Azziz, L. R. (2006). Disparate access: The disproportionality of African-American students with disabilities across educational environments. Exceptional Children, 72, 411–424. doi:10.1177/001440290607200402
  • Slee, R. (2011). The irregular school: Exclusion, schooling, and inclusive education. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Smith, P. (2007). Have we made any progress? Including students with intellectual disabilities in regular education classrooms. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 45, 297–309. doi:10.1352/0047-6765
  • Smith, P. (2010). Whatever happened to inclusion? The place of students with intellectual disabilities in education. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
  • Smyth, J. (2005). Critical perspectives on educational leadership. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Spring, J. (1972). Education and the rise of the corporate state. Boston, MA: Beacon.
  • Stanovich, P. J., & Jordan, A. (2002). Preparing general educators to teach in inclusive classrooms: Some food for thought. Teacher Educator, 37, 173–185. doi:10.1080/08878730209555292
  • Stroman, D. (2003). The disability rights movement: From deinstitutionalization to self-determination. Lanham, MD: UP of America.
  • Taubman, P. M. (2009). Teaching by numbers: Deconstructing the discourse of standards and accountability in education. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Union of Physically Impaired Against Segregation. (1975). Fundamental principles of disability. Retrieved from http://www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies/archiveuk/UPIAS/fundamental%20principles.pdf
  • United States Department of Education. (2004). Twenty-Sixth annual report to congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, WA: Prepared by Westat for the Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services U.S. Department of Education.
  • Veblen, T. (1921). The engineers and the price system. New York, NY: B.W. Huebsch.
  • Watkins, W. H. (2011). The assault on public education: Confronting the politics of corporate school reform. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Westbrook, R. F. (1993). John Dewey and American democracy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Wong, K. K. (2008). Federalism, equity, and accountability in education. In B. S. Cooper, J. G. Cibulka, & L. D. Fusarelli (Eds.), Handbook of education politics and policy (pp. 19–29). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Yanow, D. (2000). Conducting interpretive policy analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Ysseldyke, J., Dennison, A., & Nelson, R. (2004). Large-scale assessment and accountability systems: Positive consequences for students with disabilities (Synthesis Report 51). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center for Educational Outcomes.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.