The logic of data-sense: thinking through Learning Personalisation

References

• Boyd, D., & Crawford, K. (2012). Critical questions for big data. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 662–679. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bray, B. (2012). Personalized learning. Retrieved May 7, 2014, from Rethinking Learning: http://barbarabray.net/personalized-learning/
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, I. (2000). Deleuzism: A metacommentary. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Center for Research on Education Outcomes. (2015). Online charter school study. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Clow, D. (2013). An overview of learning analytics. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(6), 683–695. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2013.827653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (1990). The logic of sense. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference, repetition. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (1995). Postscript on control societies. In G. Deleuze (Ed.), Negotiations (pp. 177–182). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1995). Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari on anti-Oedipus. In G. Deleuze (Ed.), Negotiations (pp. 13–23). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2005). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Enyon, R. (2013). The rise of Big Data: What does it mean for education, technology, and media research? Learning, Media and Technology, 38(3), 237–240. doi: 10.1080/17439884.2013.771783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feher, M. (2009). Self-appreciation; or, the aspirations of human capital. Public Culture, 21(1), 21–41. doi: 10.1215/08992363-2008-019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Freitas, E. (2013). The mathematical event: Mapping the axiomatic and the problematic in school mathematics. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 32(6), 581–599. doi: 10.1007/s11217-012-9340-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1991). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2008). The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–79. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Galloway, A. (2011). Are some things unrepresentable? Theory, Culture & Society, 28(7–8), 85–102. doi: 10.1177/0263276411423038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, I. (1994). Rethinking the school: Subjectivity, bureaucracy, criticism. St Leonards: Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Lazzarato, M. (2006). The concepts of life and living in the societies of control. In M. Fuglsang & B. Sorensen (Eds.), Deleuze and the social (pp. 171–190). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lingard, B., Thompson, G., & Sellar, S. (2016). National testing in schools: An Australian assessment. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Murphie, A. (2014). Auditland. PORTAL Journal of Multidisciplinary International Studies, 11(2), 1–41. doi: 10.5130/portal.v11i2.3407
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2011). Skills for innovation and research. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• O'Leary, D. (2013). ‘Big Data’, the ‘Internet of things’ and the ‘Internet of signs’. Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, 20(1), 53–65. doi: 10.1002/isaf.1336
   Google Scholar
• Olssen, M. (2006). Understanding the mechanisms of neoliberal control: Lifelong learning, flexibility and knowledge capitalism. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 25(3), 213–230. doi: 10.1080/02601370600697045
   Google Scholar
• Peter, P., & Kairam, S. (2013). A knowledge-tracing model of learning from a social tagging system. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 23(2-3), 139–168. doi: 10.1007/s11257-012-9132-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, M. (1999). The audit society: Rituals of verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2009). Globalizing education policy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (2004). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rutkin, A. (2015, December 30). Hate exams? Now a computer can grade you by watching you learn. New Scientist, n.p.
   Google Scholar
• Savat, D. (2009). Deleuze's objectile: From discipline to modulation. In M. Poster & D. Savat (Eds.), Deleuze and new technology (pp. 45–62). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sellar, S. (2015). A feel for numbers: Affect, data and education policy. Critical Studies in Education, 56(1), 131–146. doi: 10.1080/17508487.2015.981198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. (2014). Data entry: Towards the critical study of digital data and education. Learning, Media and Technology, 40(1), 64–82. doi: 10.1080/17439884.2014.921628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siemens, G. (2013). Learning analytics: The emergence of a discipline. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), 1380–1400. doi: 10.1177/0002764213498851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, G., & Cook, I. (2013). Mapping teacher-faces. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 32(4), 379–395. doi: 10.1007/s11217-012-9335-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, G., & Cook, I. (2014). Education policy-making and time. Journal of Education Policy, 29(5), 700–715. doi: 10.1080/02680939.2013.875225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbert, K., Duval, E., Klerkx, J., Govaerts, S., & Santos, J. (2013). Learning analytics dashboard applications. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), 1500–1509. doi: 10.1177/0002764213479363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virilio, P., & Lotringer, S. (1997). Pure war. New York, NY: Semiotext.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. (2008). Gilles Deleuze's logic of sense: A critical introduction and guide. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, B. (2015). Governing software: Networks, databases and algorithmic power in the digital governance of public education. Learning, Media and Technology, 40(1), 83–105. doi: 10.1080/17439884.2014.924527
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar