‘A fair go for all?’ Australia’s language-in-migration policy

References

• Ahearn, L. M. (2001). Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 109–137. doi:10.2307/3069211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2011, June 27, 2014). Two-thirds of recent migrants and temporary residents employed. Retrieved January 5, 2016, from http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/[email protected]/mediareleasesbytitle/76AECC7A98CE76E5CA257D040012987B?OpenDocument
   Google Scholar
• Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (2010). Language assessment in practice: Developing language assessments and justifying their use in the real world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Capstick, T. (2011). Language and migration: The social and economic benefits of learning English in Pakistan. In H. Coleman (Ed.), Dreams and realities: Developing countries and the English language (pp. 2–23). London: British Council.
   Google Scholar
• Chowdhury, F., & Hamid, M. O. (in press). Language, migration and social wellbeing: A narrative inquiry into the lives of low English proficiency Bangladeshi migrants in Australia. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crooks, T. J., Kane, M., & Cohen, A. S. (1996). Threats to the valid use of assessments. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 3(3), 265–286. doi:10.1080/0969594960030302
   Google Scholar
• Department of Immigration and Border Protection. (2014). Australian citizenship: Our common bond. Belconnen, ACT: National Communications Branch, DIBP.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Immigration and Border Protection. (2015). SkillSelect. Retrieved December 3, 2015, from https://www.border.gov.au/Lega/Lega/Form/Immi-FAQs/what-is-skillselect
   Google Scholar
• Elder, C., Iwashita, N., & McNamara, T. (2002). Estimating the difficulty of oral proficiency tasks: What does the test-taker have to offer? Language Testing, 19(4), 347–368. doi:10.1191/0265532202lt235oa
   Google Scholar
• Extra, G., Spotti, M., & Van Avermaet, P. (Eds.). (2009). Language testing, migration and citizenship: Cross-national perspectives on integration regimes. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, J., & Cheng, L. (2007). Did we take the same test? Differing accounts of the Ontario Secondary School Literacy Test by first and second language test-takers. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 14(1), 9–26. doi:10.1080/09695940701272773
   Google Scholar
• Hamid, M. O. (2015). English and employability, mobility and development: An auto-ethnographic exploration. Retrieved from http://www.britishcouncil.org.bd/sites/default/files/bc_think_piece_obaid_hamid_08_10_2015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hamid, M. O. (2016). Policies of global English tests: Test-takers’ perspectives on the IELTS retake policy. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 37(3), 472–487. doi:10.1080/01596306.2015.1061978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamid, M. O., & Hoang, T. H. N. (2012, August 4–5). Impacts of the IELTS (International English Language Testing System): Voices of the test-takers. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Leadership in Pedagogies and Learning, Brisbane, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Hawthorne, L. (1997). The political dimension of English language testing in Australia. Language Testing, 14(3), 248–260. doi:10.1177/026553229701400303
   Google Scholar
• Kane, M. T. (2012). What the bar examination must achieve: Three perspectives. The Bar Examiner, 81(3), 6–15.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkland, M. C. (1971). The effects of tests on students and schools. Review of Educational Research, 41(4), 303–350. doi:10.2307/1169441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klapdor, M., Coombs, M., & Bohm, C. (2009). Australian citizenship: A chronology of major developments in policy and law. Retrieved December 30, 2015, from http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/Parliamentary_Library/pubs/BN/0910/AustCitizenship
   Google Scholar
• Kubota, R. (2011). Questioning linguistic instrumentalism: English, neoliberalism, and language tests in Japan. Linguistics and Education, 22(3), 248–260. doi:10.1016/j.linged.2011.02.002
   Google Scholar
• Kubota, R. (2015). Neoliberal paradoxes of language learning: Xenophobia and international communication. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 1–2. doi:10.1080/01434632.2015.1071825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, T. (2000). Language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, T. (2007). Submission to the Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Committee in relation to an Inquiry into the Australian Citizenship Amendment (Citizenship Testing) Bill 2007 (pp. 1–15). Retrieved January 6, 2016, from www.aph.gov.au/~/media/wopapub/senate/committee/legcon_ctte/completed_inquiries/2004_07/citizenship_testing/submissions/sub33_pdf.ashx
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, T. (2009). Australia: The dictation test redux? Language Assessment Quarterly, 6(1), 106–111. doi:10.1080/15434300802606663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, T., & Roever, C. (2006). Language testing: The social dimension. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, T., & Shohamy, E. (2008). Language tests and human rights. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 18(1), 89–95. doi:10.1111/j.1473-4192.2008.00191.x
   Google Scholar
• Merrifield, G. (2012). The use of IELTS for assessing immigration eligibility in Australia. New Zealand, Canada and the United Kingdom. IELTS Research Reports, 13, 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (pp. 13–103). New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Moss, P. A. (1998). The role of consequences in validity theory. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 17(2), 6–12. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.1998.tb00826.x
   Google Scholar
• Ndhlovu, F. (2008). A critical discourse analysis of the history of the language question in Australia’s migration policies: 1901–1957. Australian Critical Race and Whiteness Studies Association (ACRAWSA) e-Journal, 4(2), 17–33.
   Google Scholar
• Ndhlovu, F. (2009). Australia’s language-in-migration policies: Another site for subtle social exclusion. In N. Othman & S. Govindasamy (Eds.), English and Asia (pp. 233–259). Kuala Lumpur: IIUM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Platonova, A., & Urso, G. (2012). Labour shortages and migration policy. Brussels: Independent Network of Labour Migration and Integration Experts. Retrieved January 6, 2016, from http://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=9928&langId=en
   Google Scholar
• Shohamy, E. (2001). The power of tests: A critical perspective on the uses of language tests. Harlow: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Shohamy, E. (2009). Language tests for immigrants – Why language? Why tests? Why citizenship? In G. Hogan-Brun, C. Mar-Molinero, & P. Stevenson (Eds.), Discourses on language and integration: Critical perspectives on language testing regimes in Europe (pp. 45–60). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Shohamy, E., & McNamara, T. (2009). Language tests for citizenship, immigration, and asylum. Language Assessment Quarterly, 6(1), 1. doi:10.1080/15434300802606440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Templer, B. (2004). High-stakes tests as high fees: Notes and queries on the international English assessment market. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 2(1), 189–226.
   Google Scholar