# tellPearson: the activist ‘public education’ network

References

• Apple, M. (2009). Can critical education interrupt the right? Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 30(3), 239–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Au, W., & Ferrare, J. (2015). Mapping corporate education reform: Power and policy networks in the neoliberal state. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (2012). Global education Inc.: New policy networks and the neo-liberal social imaginary. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J., & Junemann, C. (2012). Networks, new governance and education. Bristol: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. (2003). Communicating global activism. Information, Communication & Society, 6(2), 143–168. doi: 10.1080/1369118032000093860a
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, W., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York, NY: Greenwood.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1989). Social space and symbolic power. Sociological Theory, 7(1), 14–25. doi: 10.2307/202060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1993). Some properties of fields. In P. Bourdieu (Ed.), Sociology in question (R. Nice, Trans.) (pp. 72–77). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruns, A., & Burgess, J. (2011). New methodologies for researching news discussion on Twitter. Journalism Studies, 13(5–6), 801–814. doi: 10.1080/1461670X.2012.664428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burch, P. (2009). Hidden markets: The new education privatization. Hoboken, NJ: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (2012). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the internet age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, T., Lu, D., Kan, M., & Cui, P. (2013). Understanding and classifying image tweets. Retrieved from http://media.cs.tsinghua.edu.cn/~multimedia/cuipeng/papers/ImageTweets.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Emirbayer, M., & Johnson, V. (2008). Bourdieu and organizational analysis. Theory and Society, 37(1), 1–44. doi: 10.1007/s11186-007-9052-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg, J., & MacAulay, M. (2009). NPO 2.0? Exploring the web presence of environmental nonprofit organizations in Canada. Global Media Journal–Canadian Edition, 2(1), 63–88.
   Google Scholar
• Highfield, T., & Leaver, T. (2015). A methodology for mapping instagram hashtags. First Monday, 20(1–5). Retrieved November 12, 2016, from http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/5563/4195
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, A. (2015). Network ethnography and the cyberflâneur: Evolving policy sociology in education. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 29(3), 381–398. doi: 10.1080/09518398.2015.1053159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan, A., Sellar, S., & Lingard, B. (2015). Network restructuring of global edu-business: The case of Pearson’s efficacy framework. In W. Au, & J. Ferrare (Eds.), Mapping corporate education reform: Power and policy networks in the neoliberal state (pp. 1–22). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, A., Sellar, S., & Lingard, B. (2016a). Commercialising comparison: Pearson puts the TLC in soft capitalism. Journal of Education Policy, 31(3), 243–258. doi: 10.1080/02680939.2015.1112922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan, A., Sellar, S., & Lingard, B. (2016b). Corporate social responsibility and neo-social accountability in education: The case of Pearson plc. In T. Verger, C. Lubienski, & G. Steiner-Khamsi (Eds.), World yearbook in education 2016: The global education industry (pp. 107–124). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hursh, D. (2016). The end of public schools: The corporate reform agenda to privatize education. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jansen, B., Zhang, M., Sobel, K., & Chowdury, A. (2009). Twitter power: Tweets as electronic word of mouth. Journal of the Association for Information, Science and Technology, 60(11), 2169–2188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junemann, C., & Ball, S. J. (2015). Pearson and PALF: The mutating giant. Retrieved from https://download.ei-ie.org/Docs/WebDepot/ei_palf_publication_web_pages_01072015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lovejoy, K., Waters, R., & Saxton, G. (2012). Information, communication and action: How non-profit organisations use social media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(3), 337–353. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01576.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macpherson, I., Robertson, S., & Walford, G. (Eds.). (2014). Education, privatization and social justice: Case studies from Africa, south Asia and South East Asia. Oxford: Symposium Books.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson. (2016). Annual report and accounts, 2015. Retrieved from https://www.pearson.com/ar2015.html
   Google Scholar
• Rao, H., Morrill, C., & Zald, M. (2000). Power plays: How social movements and collective action create new organizational forms. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22(1), 237–281. doi: 10.1016/S0191-3085(00)22007-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravitch, D. (2013). Reign of error: The hoax of the privatization movement and the danger to America’s public schools. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Reckhow, S. (2013). Follow the money: How foundation dollars change public school politics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Riep, C. (2015). Corporatised education in the Philippines: Pearson, Ayala Corporation and the emergence of Affordable Private Education Centres (APEC). Retrieved from http://download.ei-ie.org/Docs/WebDepot/Philippine%20Study/Research_C.%20Riep_APEC%20Philippines_final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. (2013). Digital methods. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sachs, J. (2003). The activist teaching profession. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sellar, S., & Lingard, B. (2013). Looking east: Shanghai, PISA 2009 and the reconstitution of reference societies in the global policy field. Comparative Education, 49(4), 464–485. doi: 10.1080/03050068.2013.770943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, K. (2015). Report of the Special Rapporteur on the right to education. Retrieved from https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G16/070/33/PDF/G1607033.pdf?OpenElement
   Google Scholar
• Tarrow, S. (1994). Power in movement: Social movements and contentious politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Verger, A., Lubienski, C., & Steiner-Khamis, G. (2016). World yearbook of education 2016: The global education industry. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wanna, J. (2009). Political chronicles, commonwealth of Australia, July to December 2008. Australian Journal of Politics and History, 55(2), 261–315. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8497.2009.01517a.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellman, B. (2002). Little boxes, globalization and networked individualism. In M. Tanabe, P. van den Desselaar, & T. Ishida (Eds.), Digital cities (pp. 10–25). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, B. (2016). Digital education governance: Data visualization, predictive analytics, and ‘real-time’ policy instruments. Journal of Education Policy, 31(2), 123–141. doi: 10.1080/02680939.2015.1035758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, W., Sang, Y., Blasiola, S., & Park, H. (2014). Predicting opinion leaders in twitter activism networks: The case of the Wisconsin recall election. American Behavioural Scientist, 13(1), 1–16.
   Google Scholar