Affect and counter-conduct: cultivating action for social change in human rights education

References

• Abrams, K. (2011). Emotions in the mobilization of rights. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 46(2), 551–589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adami, R. (2012). Reconciling universality and particularity through a cosmopolitan outlook on human rights. Cosmopolitan Civil Societies Journal, 4(2), 22–37.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Daraweesh, F., & Snauwaert, D. (2013). Toward a hermeneutical theory of international human rights education. Educational Theory, 63(4), 389–412. doi: 10.1111/edth.12030
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. (Ed.). (1990). Foucault and education: Disciplines and knowledge. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barreto, J. M. (2013). Human rights and emotions from the perspective of the colonized: Anthropofagi, legal surrealism and subaltern studies. Revista de Estudos Constitucionais, Hermeneutica e Teoria do Direito, 5(2), 106–115.
   Google Scholar
• Baxi, U. (2002). The future of human rights. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baxi, U. (2007). Human rights in a posthuman world. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berlant, L. (2000). The subject of true feeling: Pain, privacy, and politics. In S. Ahmed, J. Kilby, C. Lury, M. McNeil, & B. Skeggs (Eds.), Transformations: Thinking through feminism (pp. 33–47). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L., & Chiapello, E. (2007). The new spirit of capitalism. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Burkitt, I. (2014). Emotions and social relations. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cadman, L. (2010). How (not) to be governed: Foucault, critique and the political. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 28(3), 539–556. doi: 10.1068/d4509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coysh, J. (2014). The dominant discourse of human rights education: A critique. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 6(1), 89–114. doi: 10.1093/jhuman/hut033
   Google Scholar
• Cvetkovich, C. (2012). Depression: A public feeling. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, A. (2011). In praise of counter-conduct. History of the Human Sciences, 24(4), 25–41. doi: 10.1177/0952695111411625
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demetriou, O. (2016). Counter-conduct and the everyday: Anthropological engagements with philosophy. Global Society, 30(2), 218–237. doi: 10.1080/13600826.2015.1133568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douzinas, C. (2013). Philosophy and resistance in the crisis. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1990a). The history of sexuality, vol. 1: An introduction. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1990b). The history of sexuality, vol. 2: The use of pleasure. New York, NY: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2007). The politics of truth. Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext(e).
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2008). The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the Collége de France 1978–1979 (Ed. M. Senellart). New York, NY: Picador.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2009). Security, territory, population: Lectures at the Collége de France 1977–1978 (Vol. 4). New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gammerl, B. (2012). Emotional styles—concepts and challenges. Rethinking History, 16(2), 161–175. doi: 10.1080/13642529.2012.681189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keet, A. (2015). It’s time: Critical human rights education in an age of counter-hegemonic distrust. Education as Change, 19(3), 46–64. doi: 10.1080/16823206.2015.1085621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keet, A. (2014). Plasticity, critical hope and the regeneration of human rights education. In V. Bozalek, B. Leibowitz, R. Carolissen, & M. Boler (Eds.), Discerning critical hope in educational practices (pp. 69–81). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Keet, A. (2009). Reflections on the colloquium within a human rights discourse. In M. Nkomo & S. Vandeyar (Eds.), Thinking diversity, building cohesion: A transnational dialogue on education (pp. 211–220). Amsterdam: Rozenberg Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Keet, A. (2012). Discourse, betrayal, critique: The renewal of human rights education. In C. Roux (Ed.), Safe spaces: Human rights education in diverse contexts (pp. 7-27). Rotterdam: SensePublishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kenway, J., & Fahey, J. (2011). Getting emotional about ‘brain mobility’. Emotion, Space and Society, 4(3), 187–194. doi: 10.1016/j.emospa.2010.07.003
   Google Scholar
• Knowles, D. (2003). Political philosophy. In J. Shand (Ed.), Fundamentals of philosophy (pp. 326–350). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, T. (2011). Foucault, governmentality, and critique: Cultural politics and the promise of democracy. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
   Google Scholar
• Lohrenscheit, C. (2002). International approaches in human rights education. International Review of Education, 48(3–4), 173–185. doi: 10.1023/A:1020386216811
   Google Scholar
• Malabou, C. (2008). What should we do with our brains? New York, NY: Fordham University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Odysseos, L. (2016). Human rights, self-formation and resistance against disposability: Grounding Foucault’s ‘theorizing practice’ of counter-conduct in Bhopal. Global Society, 30(2), 179–200. doi: 10.1080/13600826.2016.1141178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odysseos, L., Death, C., & Malmvig, H. (2016). Interrogating Michel Foucault’s counter-conduct: Theorizing the subjects and practices of resistance in global politics. Global Society, 30(2), 151–156. doi: 10.1080/13600826.2016.1144568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, M. A., & Besley, T. (Eds.). (2007). Why Foucault? New directions in educational research. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Popkewitz, T. S., & Brennan, M. (Eds.). (1998). Foucault’s challenge: Discourse, knowledge, and power in education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reckwitz, A. (2012). Affective spaces: A praxeological outlook. Rethinking History, 16(2), 241–258. doi: 10.1080/13642529.2012.681193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, J. (2008). The new ‘new’: Making a case for critical affect studies. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 94(2), 200–212. doi: 10.1080/00335630801975434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossdale, C., & Stierl, M. (2016). Everything is dangerous: Conduct and counter-conduct in the occupy movement. Global Society, 30(2), 157–178. doi: 10.1080/13600826.2015.1133569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R. (1996). Social practices: A Wittgensteinian approach to human activity and the social. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scheer, M. (2012). Are emotions a kind of practice (and is that what makes them have a history)? A Bourdieuian approach to understanding emotion. History and Theory, 51(2), 193–220. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2303.2012.00621.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sliwinski, S. (2005). Thinking without banisters: Toward a compassionate inquiry into human rights education. Educational Theory, 55(2), 219–230. doi: 10.1111/j.0013-2004.2005.00008.x
   Google Scholar
• Wetherell, M. (2012). Affect and emotion: A new social science understanding. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wetherell, M. (2013). Affect and discourse—what’s the problem? From affect as excess to affective/discursive practice. Subjectivity, 6(4), 349–368. doi: 10.1057/sub.2013.13
   Google Scholar
• Wetherell, M., McCreanor, T., McConville, A., & Moewaka Barnes, H. (2015). Settling space and covering the nation: Some conceptual considerations in analyzing affect and discourse. Emotion, Space and Society, 16(1), 58–64.
   Google Scholar
• Zembylas, M. (2014). Theorizing ‘difficult knowledge’ in the aftermath of the ‘affective turn’: Implications for curriculum and pedagogy in handling traumatic representations. Curriculum Inquiry, 44(3), 390–412. doi: 10.1111/curi.12051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zembylas, M. (2016a). Toward a critical-sentimental orientation in human rights education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 48(11), 1151–1167. doi: 10.1080/00131857.2015.1118612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zembylas, M. (2016b). Political depression, cruel optimism and pedagogies of reparation: Questions of criticality and affect in human rights education. Critical Studies in Education. doi:10.1080/17508487.2016.1176065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zembylas, M. (2016c). Foucault’s engagement with human rights: Seeking the renewal of human rights education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 50(3), 384–397. doi: 10.1111/1467-9752.12148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zembylas, M., Charalambous, P., Charalambous, C., & Lesta, S. (2016). Toward a critical hermeneutical approach of human rights education: Universal ideals, contextual realities and teachers’ difficulties. Journal of Curriculum Studies. doi:10.1080/00220272.2016.1188156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar