‘Life’ and education policy: intervention, augmentation and computation

References

• Adams, P. (2016). Education policy: Explaining, framing and forming. Journal of Education Policy, 31(3), 290–307. doi: 10.1080/02680939.2015.1084387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacchi, C. (2012). Why study problematizations? Making politics visible. Open Journal of Political Science, 2, 1–8. doi: 10.4236/ojps.2012.21001
   Google Scholar
• Baedke, J. (2017). The new biology of the social: Shaping humans’ future, science, and public health. In G. Verschraegen, F. Vandermoere, & L. Braeckmans (Eds.), Imagined futures in science, technology and society (pp. 45–64). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, B. M. (2002). The hunt for disability: The new eugenics and the normalization of school children. The Teachers College Record, 104(4), 663–703. doi: 10.1111/1467-9620.00175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, R. S. (2015). Crash space. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 39(1), 186–204. doi: 10.1111/misp.12034
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (1995). Intellectuals or technicians? The urgent role of theory in education studies. British Journal of Educational Studies, 43, 255–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (2013). Foucault, power and education. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J., & Junemann, C. (2012). Networks, new governance and education. Bristol: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., & Braun, A. (2012). How schools do policy: Policy enactments in secondary schools. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, G., Gilman, N., Stavrianakis, A., & Rabinow, P. (2009). From synthetic biology to biohacking: Are we prepared? Nat Biotech, 27(12), 1109–1111. doi: 10.1038/nbt1209-1109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, M., Fors, V., & Eriksson, J. (2016). Cooking for perfection: Transhumanism and the mysteries of kitchen mastery. Confero: Essays on Education, Philosophy and Politics, 4(2), 111–135. doi: 10.3384/confero.2001-4562.161213
   Google Scholar
• Bird, A. (2007). Perceptions of epigenetics. Nature, 447(7143), 396–398. doi: 10.1038/nature05913
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, W. (2015). Undoing the demos: Neoliberalism’s stealth revolution. Brooklyn: Zone Books.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, N. (2012). The epigenetics revolution: How modern biology is rewriting our understanding of genetics, disease, and inheritance. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, D. (2017). Market mobilities/immobilities: Mutation, path-dependency, and the spread of charter school policies in the United States. Critical Studies in Education, 58(2), 168–186. doi: 10.1080/17508487.2016.1242507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling, K. W., Ackerman, S. L., Hiatt, R. H., Lee, S. S., & Shim, J. K. (2016). Enacting the molecular imperative: How gene-environment interaction research links bodies and environments in the post-genomic age. Social Science & Medicine, 155, 51–60. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.03.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean, M. (1999). Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• de Freitas, E. (2017). The temporal fabric of research methods: Posthuman social science and the digital data deluge. Research in Education, 98(1), 27–43. doi: 10.1177/0034523717723386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delfanti, A. (2012). Tweaking genes in your garage: Biohacking between activism and entrepreneurship. In W. Sützl & T. Hug (Eds.), Activist media and biopolitics: Critical media interventions in the age of biopower (pp. 163–178). Innsbruck: Innsbruck University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Vos, J. (2015). Deneurologizing education? From psychologisation to neurologisation and back. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 34(3), 279–295. doi: 10.1007/s11217-014-9440-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1980). Power/ knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977. New York: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1990). The history of sexuality: An introduction, volume 1. New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gillborn, D. (2010). Reform, racism and the centrality of whiteness: Assessment, ability and the ‘new eugenics’. Irish Educational Studies, 29(3), 231–252. doi: 10.1080/03323315.2010.498280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie, T. (2014). The relevance of algorithms. In T. Gillespie, P. J. Boczkowski, & K. A. Foot (Eds.), Media technologies (pp. 167–194). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Green, S. (2016). What is the ‘post’ in postgenomics? Metascience, 25(1), 83–86. doi: 10.1007/s11016-015-0040-y
   Google Scholar
• Gulson, K. N., & Webb, P. T. (2017). Mapping an emergent field of ‘computational education policy’: Policy rationalities, prediction and data in the age of artificial intelligence. Research in Education, 98(1), 14–26. doi: 10.1177/0034523717723385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harari, Y. N. (2015). Homo deus: A brief history of tomorrow. London: Harvill Secker.
   Google Scholar
• Harney, S., & Moten, F. (2013). The undercommons: Fugitive planning & black study. Brooklyn: Minor Compositions.
   Google Scholar
• Hindess, B. (2005). Politics as government: Michel Foucault’s analysis of political reason. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 30(4), 389–413. doi: 10.1177/030437540503000401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kay, L. E. (1996). The molecular vision of life: Caltech, the Rockefeller Foundation, and the rise of the new biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, E. F. (2015). The postgenomic genome. In S. S. Richardson & H. Stevens (Eds.), Postgenomics: Perspectives on biology after the genome (pp. 9–1). Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knowland, V. C., & Thomas, M. S. (2014). Educating the adult brain: How the neuroscience of learning can inform educational policy. International Review of Education, 60(1), 99–122. doi: 10.1007/s11159-014-9412-6
   Google Scholar
• Landecker, H., & Panofsky, A. (2013). From social structure to gene regulation, and back: A critical introduction to environmental epigenetics for sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 39(1), 333–357. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemke, T. (2011). Biopolitics: An advanced introduction . New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Loi, M., Del Savio, L., & Stupka, E. (2013). Social epigenetics and equality of opportunity. Public Health Ethics, 6(2), 142–153. doi: 10.1093/phe/pht019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longo, D. L., & Drazen, J. M. (2016). Data sharing. New England Journal of Medicine, 374(3), 276–277. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1516564
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansfield, B., & Guthman, J. (2015). Epigenetic life: Biological plasticity, abnormality, and new configurations of race and reproduction. Cultural Geographies, 22(1), 3–20. doi: 10.1177/1474474014555659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazarkis, J. (2016). The grand narratives of democratic and libertarian transhumanism: A Lyotardian approach to transhumanist politics. Confero: Essays on Education, Philosophy and Politics, 4(2), 11–31. doi: 10.3384/confero.2001-4562.161217
   Google Scholar
• McGimpsey, I., Bradbury, A., & Santori, D. (2016). Revisions to rationality: The translation of ‘new knowledges’ into policy under the Coalition Government. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 1–14. doi: 10.1080/01425692.2016.1202747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meloni, M. (2016). Political biology: Science and social values in human heredity from eugenics to epigenetics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Meloni, M. (2017). Race in an epigenetic time: Thinking biology in the plural. The British Journal of Sociology, 68, 389–409. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meloni, M., & Testa, G. (2014). Scrutinizing the epigenetics revolution. BioSocieties, 9(4), 431–456. doi: 10.1057/biosoc.2014.22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millei, Z., & Joronen, M. (2016). The (bio)politicization of neuroscience in Australian early years policies: Fostering brain-resources as human capital. Journal of Education Policy, 31(4), 389–404. doi: 10.1080/02680939.2016.1148780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morning, A. (2014). And you thought we had moved beyond all that: Biological race returns to the social sciences. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 37(10), 1676–1685. doi: 10.1080/01419870.2014.931992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, P. (2014). Biotechnology, education and life politics: Debating genetic futures from school to society. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Oakes, J., & Lipton, M. (2004). Schools that shock the conscience: Williams v. California and the struggle for education on equal terms fifty years after Brown. African-American Law & Policy Report, 6, 152.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2011). Education at a glance 2011: OECD indicators. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/eag-2011-en
   Google Scholar
• Ozga, J. (2000). Policy research in educational settings: Contested terrain. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parisi, L. (2017). After nature: The dynamic automation of technical objects. In J. Weinstein & C. Colebrook (Eds.), Posthumous life: Theorizing beyond the posthuman (pp. 155–178). New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, M. A. (2001). Poststructuralism, Marxism and neoliberalism. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Pickersgill, M. (in press). The value of the imagined biological in policy and society: Somaticizing and economizing British subject(ivitie)s. In S. Hilgartner, S. Gibbon, B. Prainsack, & J. Lamoreaux (Eds.), Handbook of genomics, health & society. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pickersgill, M., Niewöhner, J., Müller, R., Martin, P., & Cunningham-Burley, S. (2013). Mapping the new molecular landscape: Social dimensions of epigenetics. New Genetics and Society, 32(4), 429–447. doi: 10.1080/14636778.2013.861739
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popkewitz, T. S., & Lindblad, S. (2004). Historicizing the future: Educational reform, systems of reason, and the making of children who are the future citizens. Journal of Educational Change, 5(3), 229–247. doi: 10.1023/B:JEDU.0000041042.53119.f5
   Google Scholar
• Pykett, J. (2016). Brain culture: Shaping policy through neuroscience. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rabinow, P. (1992). Artificiality and enlightenment: From sociobiology to biosociality. In J. Crary & S. Kwinter (Eds.), Incorporations (pp. 234–252). New York: Zone Books.
   Google Scholar
• Rabinow, P., & Rose, N. (2003). Introduction: The essential Foucault: Selections from essential works of Foucault 1954–1984 (pp. vii–xxxv). New York: The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rabinow, P., & Rose, N. (2006). Biopower today. BioSocieties, 1, 195–217. doi: 10.1017/S1745855206040014
   Google Scholar
• Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2010). Globalizing educational policy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (2007). The politics of life itself: Biomedicine, power, and subjectivity in the twenty-first century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (2013). The human sciences in a biological age. Theory, Culture & Society, 30(1), 3–34. doi: 10.1177/0263276412456569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shonkoff, J. P. (2010). Building a new biodevelopmental framework to guide the future of early childhood policy. Child Development, 81(1), 357–367. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01399.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shonkoff, J. P., Boyce, W., & McEwen, B. S. (2009). Neuroscience, molecular biology, and the childhood roots of health disparities: Building a new framework for health promotion and disease prevention. JAMA, 301(21), 2252–2259. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.754
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solon, O. (2017, Sept 4). The Silicon Valley execs who don’t eat for days: ‘It’s not dieting, it’s biohacking’. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2017/sep/04/silicon-valley-ceo-fasting-trend-diet-is-it-safe
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, H. (2013). Life out of sequence: A data-driven history of bioinformatics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, H., & Richardson, S. S. (2015). Beyond the genome. In S. S. Richardson & H. Stevens (Eds.), Postgenomics: Perspectives on biology after the genome (pp. 1–8). Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, G. (in press). Learning personalisation: Technics, disorientation and governance. In A. Wilkins, & A. Olmedo (Eds.), Education governance and social theory: Interdisciplinary approaches London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, P. T. (2014). Policy problematization. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 27(3), 364–376. doi: 10.1080/09518398.2012.762480
   Google Scholar
• Weinstein, J., & Colebrook, C. (2017). Introduction: Critical life studies and the problems of inhuman ties and posthumous life. In J. Weinstein & C. Colebrook (Eds.), Posthumous life: Theorizing beyond the posthuman (pp. 1–16). New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, B. (2016). Coding the biodigital child: The biopolitics and pedagogic strategies of educational data science. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 24(3), 401–416. doi: 10.1080/14681366.2016.1175499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, B. (2017). Who owns educational theory? Big data, algorithms and the expert power of education data science. E-Learning and Digital Media, 14(0), 105–122. doi: 10.1177/2042753017731238
   Google Scholar
• Youdell, D. (2016). New biological sciences, sociology and education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 37(5), 788–800. doi: 10.1080/01425692.2016.1184406
   Google Scholar
• Young, J. R. (2017, July 19). ‘Precision education’ hopes to apply big data to lift diverse student groups. EdSurge. Retrieved from https://www.edsurge.com/news/2017-07-19-precision-education-hopes-to-apply-big-data-to-lift-diverse-student-groups?utm_content=bufferbf4ad&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, N., Baker, H. W., Tufts, M., Raymond, R. E., Salihu, H., & Elliott, M. R. (2013). Early childhood lead exposure and academic achievement: Evidence from Detroit public schools, 2008–2010. American Journal of Public Health, 103(3), e72–e77. doi: 10.2105/ajph.2012.301164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar