Teachers’ democratic assignment: a critical discourse analysis of teacher education policies in Ireland and Sweden

References

• Arnot, M., & Dillabough, J.-A. (1999). Feminist politics and democratic values in education. Curriculum Inquiry, 29(2), 159–189. doi: 10.1111/0362-6784.00120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. J. J. (2012). Giving teaching back to education: Responding to the disappearance of the teacher. Phenomenology & Practice, 6(2), 35–49. doi: 10.29173/pandpr19860
   Google Scholar
• Boostrom, R. (2016). Rethinking John Dewey’s democracy and education on its centennial. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 48(1), 1–3. doi: 10.1080/00220272.2015.1063697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cahill, K. (2017). Socio-sartorial inscriptions of social class in a study of school and identity in Ireland. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education. doi: 10.1080/01596306.2017.1327422
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., & Villegas, A. M. (2015). Framing teacher preparation research: An overview of the field, part 1. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(1), 7–20. doi: 10.1177/0022487114549072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Courtois, A. (2015). ‘Thousands waiting at our gates’: Moral character, legitimacy and social justice in Irish elite schools. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 36(1), 53–70. doi: 10.1080/01425692.2014.967840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Education and Science (DES). (2002). Advisory group on post-primary teacher education. Dublin: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1916/1959). Democracy and education. New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Edling, S. (2012). The (embodied) citizen: Exploring young people’s possibilities to engage in the wellbeing of others? Utbildning & Demokrati. Tidskrift för didaktik och utbildningspolitik, 21(1), 57–76.
   Google Scholar
• Edling, S. (2015). Between curriculum complexity and stereotypes: Exploring stereotypes of teachers and education in media as a question of structural violence. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 47(3), 399–415. doi: 10.1080/00220272.2014.956796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edling, S., & Mooney Simmie, G. (2017). Democracy and emancipation in teacher education: A summative content analysis of teachers’ democratic assignment expressed in policies for teacher education in Sweden and Ireland between 2000-2010. Citizenship, Social & Economic Education, 1–15. doi: 10.1177/2047173417743760
   Google Scholar
• Englund, T. (1986). Curriculum as a political problem: Changing educational conceptions, with special reference to citizenship education (Dissertation). Uppsala: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Englund, T. (1997). Towards a dynamic analysis of the content of schooling: Narrow and broad didactics in Sweden. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 29(3), 267–288. doi: 10.1080/002202797184044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Englund, T. (2002). Higher education, democracy, and citizenship: The democratic potential of the university? Studies in Philosophy and Education, 21(4-5), 281–287. doi: 10.1023/A:1019840006193
   Google Scholar
• Englund, T. (2016). On moral education through deliberative communication. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 48(1), 58–76. doi:10.1080/00220272.2015.1051119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2004). Critical discourse analysis as a method in social scientific research. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 121–138). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis and critical policy studies. Critical Policy Studies, 7(2), 177–197. doi: 10.1080/19460171.2013.798239
   Google Scholar
• Gabbard, D., & Atkinson, T. (2007). Stossel in America: A case study of the neoliberal/ neoconservative assault on public schools and teachers. Teacher Education Quarterly, 34(2), 58–85.
   Google Scholar
• Gandin, L. A., & Apple, M. W. (2002). Thin versus thick democracy in education: Porto Alegre and the creation of alternatives to neo-liberalism. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 12(2), 99–116. doi: 10.1080/09620210200200085
   Google Scholar
• Hartung, C. (2017). Global citizenship incorporated: Competing responsibilities in the education of global citizens. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 38(1), 16–29. doi: 10.1080/01596306.2015.1104849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyatt, D. (2013). The critical policy discourse analysis frame. Helping doctoral students engage with educational policy analysis. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(8), 833–845. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2013.795935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, L. (2014). Critical thinking and the anti-liberal state: The politics of pedagogic recontextualisation in Singapore. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 35(5), 692–704. doi: 10.1080/01596.2014.927173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Läroplanskommittén. (1992). Skola för bildning: Huvudbetänkande [School for Bildung: Main report]. Stockholm: Allmänna förl.
   Google Scholar
• Mooney Simmie, G., & Edling, S. (2016). Ideological governing forms in education and teacher education: A comparative study between highly secular Sweden and highly non-secular Republic of Ireland. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, NordSTEP 2, 32041, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Mooney Simmie, G., Moles, J., & O’Grady, E. (2016). Good teaching as a messy narrative of change within a policy ensemble of networks, superstructures and flows. Critical Studies in Education, 1–21. doi: 10.1080/17508487.2016.1219960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prop. (1999/2000). En förnyad lärarutbildning [A renewed teacher education] (p. 135). Stockholm: Fritzes.
   Google Scholar
• Prop. (2009/2010). Bäst i klassen – en ny lärarutbildning [Best in class – a new teacher education] (p. 89). Stockholm: Fritzes.
   Google Scholar
• Rönnberg, L. (2017). From national policy-making to global edu-business: Swedish edu-preneurs on the move. Journal of Education Policy, 32(2), 234–249. doi: 10.1080/02680939.2016.1268725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SFS. (2008). Diskrimineringslag [Discrimination Act] (p. 567).
   Google Scholar
• SFS. (2010). Skollag [School Act] (p. 800).
   Google Scholar
• Skolverket. (2009a). Diskriminerad, trakasserad, kränkt? Barns, elevers och studerandes uppfattningar om diskriminering och trakasserier [Discriminated, harassed, violated? Childrens’, pupils’, and students’ conceptions of discrimination and harassment] (p. 326). Stockholm: Fritzes.
   Google Scholar
• Skolverket. (2009b). Utvärdering av metoder mot mobbning (Rapport) [Evaluations of methods against bullying]. Stockholm: Fritzes.
   Google Scholar
• Skolverket. (2012). Arbete mot diskriminering och kränkande behandling [Work against discrimination and violating treatment]. Stockholm: Fritzes.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, L. (2016). Re-thinking Dewey’s democracy: Shifting from a process of participation to an institution of association. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 48(1), 77–93. doi: 10.1080/00220272.2015.1088068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teaching Council. (2011). Initial teacher education: Criteria and guidelines for programme providers. Maynooth: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Teaching Council Act. (2001). Dublin: Government Publications Office.
   Google Scholar
• Woodside-Jiron, H. (2011). Language, power, and participation: Using critical discourse analysis to make sense of public policy. In R. Rogers (Ed.), An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education (2nd ed., pp. 154–182). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar