‘Make money, get money’: how two autonomous schools have commercialised their services

References

• Bacchi, C. (2000). Policy as discourse: What does it mean? Where does it get us? Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 21(1), 45–57.
   Google Scholar
• Bacchi, C. (2012). Introducing the ‘what is the problem represented to be?’ approach. In A. Bletsas & C. Beasley (Eds.), Engaging with Carol Bacchi (pp. 21–24). Adelaide: The University of Adelaide.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (2007). Education plc: Understanding private sector participation in public sector education. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (2009). Privatising education, privatising education policy, privatising educational research: Network governance and the ‘competition state’. Journal of Education Policy, 24(1), 83–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J., & Youdell, D. (2009). Hidden privatisation in public education. Education Review, 21(2), 73–83.
   Google Scholar
• Berliner, D. C., & Glass, G. V. (2014). 50 myths and lies that threaten America’s public schools: The real crisis in education. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blackmore, J. (2004). Leading as emotional management work in high risk times: The counterintuitive impulses of performativity and passion. School Leadership & Management, 24(4), 439–459.
   Google Scholar
• Burch, P. (2006). The new educational privatization: Educational contracting and high stakes accountability. Teachers College Record, 108(12), 2582–2610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burch, P. (2009). Hidden markets: The new education privatization. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Forsey, M. (2009). The problem with autonomy: An ethnographic study of neoliberalism in practice at an Australian high school. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 30(4), 457–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1970). The order of things. New York: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish. Harmondsworth: Peregrine.
   Google Scholar
• Gobby, B. (2013). Principal self-government and subjectification: The exercise of principal autonomy in the western Australian independent public schools programme. Critical Studies in Education, 54(3), 273–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gobby, B. (2016). Putting ‘the system’ into a school autonomy reform: The case of the independent public schools program. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 37(1), 16–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gobby, B., Keddie, A., & Blackmore, J. (2017). Professionalism and competing responsibilities: Moderating competitive performativity in school autonomy reform. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 1, 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton Associates. (2015). School autonomy: Building the conditions for student success. Report commissioned by the Western Australian Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Hitchcock, G., & Hughes, D. (1995). Research and the teacher: A qualitative introduction to school-based research. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, A., Enright, E., Stylianou, M., & McCuaig, L. (2017). Nuancing the critique of commercialisation in schools: Recognising teacher agency. Journal of Education Policy, 8, 1–15. doi: 10.1080/02680939.2017.1394500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan, A., Sellar, S., & Lingard, B. (2016). Commercialising comparison: Pearson puts the TLC in soft capitalism. Journal of Education Policy, 31(3), 243–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamens, D. H. (2013). Globalization and the emergence of an audit culture: PISA and the search for ‘best practices’ and magic bullets. In H.-D. Meyer & A. Benavot (Eds.), PISA, power, and policy: The emergence of global educational governance (pp. 117–141). Oxford: Symposium.
   Google Scholar
• Keddie, A. (2014). It’s like Spiderman … with great power comes great responsibility: School autonomy, school context and the audit culture. School Leadership & Management, 34(5), 502–517.
   Google Scholar
• Keddie, A. (2017). School autonomy reform and public education in Australia: Implications for social justice. The Australian Educational Researcher, 44(4–5), 373–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keddie, A., Gobby, B., & Wilkins, C. (2017). School autonomy reform in Queensland: Governance, freedom and the entrepreneurial leader. School Leadership & Management, 59, 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Kimber, M., & Ehrich, L. C. (2011). The democratic deficit and school-based management in Australia. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(2), 179–199.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, S. (2017). Governing schooling through ‘what works’: The OECD’s PISA for schools. Journal of Education Policy, 32(3), 281–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, S., & Hogan, A. (2017). Reform first and ask questions later? The implications of (fast) schooling policy and ‘silver bullet’ solutions. Critical Studies in Education, 44, 1–18. doi: 10.1080/17508487.2016.1219961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingard, B., Sellar, S., Hogan, A., & Thompson, G. (2017). Commercialisation in public schooling (CIPS). Sydney: New South Wales Teachers Federation.
   Google Scholar
• Lubienski, C. (2006). School choice and privatization in education: An alternative analytical framework. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 4(1), 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Lubienski, C. (2007). Marketing schools: Consumer goods and competitive incentives for consumer information. Education and Urban Society, 40(1), 118–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubienski, C., & Lee, J. (2016). Competitive incentives and the education market: How charter schools define themselves in metropolitan Detroit. Peabody Journal of Education, 91(1), 64–80.
   Google Scholar
• Queensland Department of Education and Training. (2016). Independent public schools policy framework. Retrieved from http://education.qld.gov.au/schools/independent-public-schools/resources/ips-policy-framework.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ravitch, D. (2010). The death and life of the great American school system: How testing and choice are undermining education. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ravitch, D. (2013). Reign of error: The hoax of the privatization movement and the danger to America’s public schools. New York: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Renzulli, L. A., & Evans, L. (2005). School choice, charter schools, and white flight. Social Problems, 52(3), 398–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2009). Globalizing education policy. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts-Mahoney, H., Means, A. J., & Garrison, M. J. (2016). Netflixing human capital development: Personalized learning technology and the corporatization of K-12 education. Journal of Education Policy, 31(4), 405–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Verger, A., Steiner-Khamsi, G., & Lubienski, C. (2017). The emerging global education industry: Analysing market-making in education through market sociology. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 15(3), 325–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkins, A. (2015). Professionalizing school governance: The disciplinary effects of school autonomy and inspection on the changing role of school governors. Journal of Education Policy, 30(2), 182–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar