Politics by other means? STS and research in education

References

• Addey, C. (2018). Assembling literacy as global: The danger of a single story. In M. Milana, S. Webb, J. Holford, R. Waller, & P. Jarvis (Eds.), The palgrave international handbook on adult and lifelong education and learning (pp. 315–335). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Asdal, K. (2011). The office: The weakness of numbers and the production of non-authority. Accounting Organizations and Society, 36(1), 1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2011.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bijker, W. E. (1995). Sociohistorical technology studies. In S. Jasanoff, G. E. Markle, J. C. Petersen, & T. Pinch (Eds.), Handbook of science and technology studies, third edition (pp. 229–256). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bijker, W. E., & Law, J. (1992). Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (2000). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, London: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action, belief: A new sociology of knowledge (pp. 196–233). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M., Lascoumes, P., & Barthe, Y. (2009). Acting in an uncertain world: An essay on technical democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M., Law, J., & Rip, A. (1986). Mapping the dynamics of science and technology: Sociology of science in the real world. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M., & Muniesa, F. (2005). Economic markets as calculative collective devices. Organization Studies, 26(8), 1229–1250. doi: 10.1177/0170840605056393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camic, C., Gross, N., & Lamont, M. (Eds.). (2011). Social knowledge in the making. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chien, Y.-J. (2013). How did international agencies perceive the avian influenza problem? The adoption and manufacture of the ‘One World, One Health’ framework. Sociology of Health & Illness, 35(2), 213–226. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2012.01534.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (1988). Spinoza, practical philosophy (R. Hurley, Trans.). San Francisco: City Lights Books.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1909). Moral principles in education. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
   Google Scholar
• Dussauge, I., Helgesson, C.-F., & Lee, F. (Eds.). (2015). Value practices in the life sciences and medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Espeland, W., & Stevens, M. (2009). A sociology of quantification. Archives Europeennes de Sociologie, 49(3), 401–436. doi: 10.1017/S0003975609000150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felt, U., Fouché, R., Miller, C. A., & Smith–Doerr, L. (2016). The handbook of science and technology studies, fourth edition. London, England: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fenwick, T., & Edwards, R. (2010). Actor-Network theory in education. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fenwick, T., Nerland, M., & Jensen, K. (2012). Sociomaterial approaches to conceptualising professional learning and practice. Journal of Education and Work, 25(1), 1–13. doi: 10.1080/13639080.2012.644901
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, S. (2006). The philosophy of science and technology studies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, D. (2008). Agro-food studies in the ‘age of ecology’: Nature, corporeality, bio-politics. In R. Munton (Ed.), The rural: Critical essays in human geography (pp. 127–149). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gorur, R. (2011a). ANT on the PISA trail: Following the statistical pursuit of certainty. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(S1), 76–93. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-5812.2009.00612.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorur, R. (2011b). Policy as assemblage. European Educational Research Journal, 10(4), 611–622. doi: 10.2304/eerj.2011.10.4.611
   Google Scholar
• Gorur, R. (2017). Towards productive critique of large-scale comparisons in education. Critical Studies in Education, 58(3), 341–355. doi: 10.1080/17508487.2017.1327876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorur, R. (2018). Standards: Normative, interpretive and performative. In S. Lindblad, D. Pettersson, & T. S. Popkewitz (Eds.), Numbers, education and the making of society: International assessments and its expertise (pp. 92–109). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gröndal, H. (2018). Unpacking rational use of antibiotics. Policy in medical practice and the medical debate. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.
   Google Scholar
• Hackett, E. J., Amsterdamska, O., Lynch, M., & Wajcman, J. (2008). Introduction. In E. J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch, & J. Wajcman (Eds.), The handbook of science and technology studies, third edition (pp. 1–9). London, England: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, M. (2001). Privileged literacies: Policy, institutional process and the life of the IALS. Language and Education, 15(2–3), 178–196. doi: 10.1080/09500780108666809
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, M., Maddox, B., & Addey, C. (Eds.). (2015). Literacy as numbers: Researching the politics and practices of international literacy assessment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599. doi: 10.2307/3178066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helgesson, C.-F. (2016). Folded valuations? Valuation Studies, 4(2), 93–102. doi: 10.3384/VS.2001-5992.164293
   Google Scholar
• Hinchliffe, S. (2001). Indeterminacy in-decisions: Science, policy and politics in the BSE (bovine spongiform encephalopathy) crisis. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 26(2), 182–204. doi: 10.1111/1475-5661.00014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. (2004). The idiom of co-production. In S. Jasanoff (Ed.), States of knowledge: The co-production of science and social order (pp. 1–12). London, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. (2005). Designs on nature: Science and democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. (2012). Genealogies of STS. Social Studies of Science, 42(3), 435–441. doi: 10.1177/0306312712440174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S., & Kim, S. H. (2013). Sociotechnical imaginaries and national energy policies. Science as Culture, 22(2), 189–196. doi: 10.1080/09505431.2013.786990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S., Markle, G. E., Peterson, J. C., & Pinch, T. (1995). Handbook of science and technology studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publication, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kale-Lostuvali, E. (2016). Two sociologies of science in search of truth: Bourdieu versus Latour. Social Epistemology, 30(3), 273–296. doi: 10.1080/02691728.2015.1015062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. (1962/2012). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lampland, M., & Star, S. L. (Eds.). (2009). Standards and their stories: How quantifying, classifying, and formalizing practices shape everyday life. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Landri, P. (2018). Digital governance of education. Technology, standards and Europeanization. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1988). The pasteurization of France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1992). Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In W. E. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 225–258). Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. (Ed.). (1991). A sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology, and domination. London, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. (2009). Actor network theory and material semiotics. In B. S. Turner (Ed.), The New blackwell companion to social theory (pp. 141–158). Online: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lundahl, C. (2014). The book of books: Encyclopaedic writing in the science of education in the 1980s. In A. Nordin & D. Sundberg (Eds.), Transnational policy flows in European education (pp. 79–103). London: Symposion Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, M. (1985). Art and artifact in laboratory science: A study of shop work and shop talk in a research laboratory. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marres, N. (2015). Why map issues? On controversy analysis as a digital method. Science, Technology & Human Values, 40(5), 655–686. doi: 10.1177/0162243915574602
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mol, A. (2002). The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nelkin, D. (1979). Controversy: Politics of technical decisions. Beverly Hills: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nespor, J. (1994). Knowledge in motion. Space, time and curriculum in undergraduate physics and management. Oxon: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Ong, A. (2007). Neoliberalism as a mobile technology. Transactions of the institute for British geographers. NS, 32, 3–8.
   Google Scholar
• Ong, A., & Collier, S. J. (2005). Global assemblages, anthropological problems. In A. Ong & S. J. Collier (Eds.), Global assemblages: Technology, politics, and ethics as anthropological problems (pp. 3–22). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Piattoeva, N., Klutas, A., & Souminen, O. (2019). Making and mobilising contexts in policy and research. In R. Gorur, S. Sellar, & G. Steiner-Khamsi (Eds.), World yearbook of education 2019: Comparative methodology in the era of big data and global networks (pp. 1–9). London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pickering, A. (2008). New ontologies. In A. Pickering, & K. Guzik (Eds.), The mangle in practice: Science, society and becoming (pp. 1–14). Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, T. M. (1995). Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ruppert, E. (2011). Population objects: Interpassive subjects. Sociology, 45(2), 218–233. doi: 10.1177/0038038510394027
   Google Scholar
• Schinkel, W. (2007). Sociological discourse of the relational: The cases of Bourdieu & Latour. The Sociological Review, 55(4), 707–729. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.2007.00749.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E. (2009). The materiality of learning: Technology and knowledge in educational practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strathern, M. (2000). The tyranny of transparency. British Educational Research Journal, 26(3), 309–321. doi: 10.1080/713651562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strathern, M. (2003). New accountabilities. In M. Strathern (Ed.), Anthropological studies in accountability, ethics and the academy (pp. 1–18). Florence: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, L. (2016). 4S President’s message – September 2016. Retrieved from http://www.4sonline.org/item/4s_presidents_message_september_2016
   Google Scholar
• Sundström Sjödin, E., & Wahlström, N. (Forthcoming). The wing chair: Where is the critical in literacy? (Unpublished manuscript).
   Google Scholar
• Timmermans, S., & Berg, M. (2003). The gold standard: The challenge of evidence-based medicine and standardization in health care. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Urry, J. (2015). Climate change and society. In J. Michie & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Why the social sciences matter (pp. 45–59). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Verran, H. (2001). Science and an African logic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, B. (2019). Intimate data infrastructures: Emerging comparative methods of predictive analytics and psycho-informatics. In R. Gorur, S. Sellar, & G. Steiner-Khamsi (Eds.), World yearbook of education 2019: Comparative methodologies in the era of big data and global networks (pp. 59–75). Oxon and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Woolgar, S., & Neyland, D. (2013). Mundane governance: Ontology and accountability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar