Beyond workforce preparation: contested visions of ‘twenty-first century’ education reform

References

• Anyon, J. (1997). Ghetto schooling: A political economy of urban educational reform. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Apple, M. (2013). The politics of official knowledge: Does a national curriculum make sense? In M. Apple (Ed.), Knowledge, power, and education: The selected works of Michael Apple (pp. 195–211). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Berliner, D. (2006). Our impoverished view of educational reform. The Teachers College Record, 108(6), 949–995. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00682.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulfin, S., Johnson, N. F., & Bigum, C. (Eds.). (2015). Critical perspectives on technology and education. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, R. W., & Fuchs, B. (2006). Preparing the 21st century workforce: A new reform in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(4), 349–352. doi: 10.1002/tea.20147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, P. L., & Welner, K. G. (Eds.). (2013). Closing the opportunity gap: What America must do to give every child an even chance. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, C. W. (2010). The economic effect of education in an information technology penetrating economy: Evidence from Hong Kong. Educational Researcher, 39(5), 401–405. doi: 10.3102/0013189X10370781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, E. (2018). Digital meritocracy: Intermediary organizations and the construction of policy knowledge. Educational Policy, doi:10.1177/0895904818802116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeBray, E., Scott, J., Lubienski, C., & Jabbar, H. (2014). Intermediary organizations in charter school policy coalitions: Evidence from new Orleans. Educational Policy, 28(2), 175–206. doi: 10.1177/0895904813514132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eaton, W. M., Gasteyer, S. P., & Busch, L. (2014). Bioenergy futures: Framing sociotechnical imaginaries in local places. Rural Sociology, 79(2), 227–256. doi: 10.1111/ruso.12027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emejulu, A., & McGregor, C. (2016). Towards a radical digital citizenship in digital education. Critical Studies in Education, 1–17. doi:10.1080/17508487.2016.1234494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eynon, R. (2018). Into the mainstream: Where next for critical Ed Tech research? Learning, Media and Technology, 43(3), 217–218. doi:10.1080/17439884.2018.1506976.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Future Ready Learning: Reimagining the role of technology in education: 2016 national education technology plan. (2016). Federal office of educational technology. Washington, DC, U.S: U.S. Government Printing Office. Retrieved from https://tech.ed.gov/files/2015/12/NETP16.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gorur, R. (2015). Situated, relational and practice-oriented: The actor-network theory approach. In K. N. Gulson, M. Clarke, & E. B. Petersen (Eds.), Education policy and contemporary theory: Implications for research (pp. 87–98). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hodas, S. (1996). Technology refusal and the organizational culture of schools. In R. Kling (Ed.), Computerization and controversy: Value conflicts and social choices (pp. 197–218). New York: Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. (2004). States of knowledge: The co-production of science and the social order. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. (2015). Future imperfect: Science, technology, and the imaginations of modernity. In S. Jasanoff, & S. H. Kim (Eds.), Dreamscapes of modernity: Sociotechnical imaginaries and the fabrication of power (pp. 1–33). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S., & Kim, S. H. (Eds.). (2015). Dreamscapes of modernity: Sociotechnical imaginaries and the fabrication of power. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ladson-Billings, G. (2006). From the achievement gap to the education debt: Understanding achievement in US schools. Educational Researcher, 35(7), 3–12. doi: 10.3102/0013189X035007003
   Google Scholar
• McLeod, S., & Richardson, J. W. (2013). Supporting effective technology integration and implementation. In M. Militello, & J. Friend (Eds.), Principal 2.0: Technology and educational leadership (pp. 249–272). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2018). Teaching for the future: Effective classroom practices to transform education. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264293243-en.
   Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1435–1448. doi: 10.1177/0170840607081138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partnership for 21st Century Learning. (2015). Retrieved from https://www.P21.org//our-work/p21-framework
   Google Scholar
• Pettersson, K., Olsson, U., & Popkewitz, T. S. (2007). Nostalgia, the future, and the past as pedagogical technologies. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 28(1), 49–67.
   Google Scholar
• Player-Koro, C., Bergviken Rensfeldt, A., & Selwyn, N. (2017). Selling tech to teachers: Education trade shows as policy events. Journal of Education Policy, 33, 682–703. doi:10.1080/02680939.2017.1380232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popkewitz, T. (2008). Cosmopolitanism and the age of school reform: Science, education, and making society by making the child. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Popkewitz, T. S., & Lindblad, S. (2004). Historicizing the future: Educational reform, systems of reason, and the making of children who are the future citizens. Journal of Educational Change, 5(3), 229–247. doi: 10.1023/B:JEDU.0000041042.53119.f5
   Google Scholar
• Popkewitz, T. S., Olsson, U., & Pettersson, K. (2006). The learning society, the unfinished cosmopolitan, and governing education, public health and crime prevention at the beginning of the twenty-first century. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38(4), 431–449. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-5812.2006.00203.x
   Google Scholar
• Program on Science, Technology and Society. (2012). STS research platform sociotechnical imaginaries. Harvard Kennedy School, Harvard University. Retrieved from http://sts.hks.harvard.edu/research/platforms/imaginaries/
   Google Scholar
• Ramiel, H. (2017). User or student: Constructing the subject in Edtech incubator. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 1–13. doi:10.1080/01596306.2017.1365694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Schrum, L., & Levin, B. B. (2009). Leading 21st-century schools: Harnessing technology for engagement and achievement. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. (2014). Distrusting educational technology: Critical questions for changing times. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N., & Facer, K. (Eds.). (2013). The politics of education and technology: Conflicts, controversies, and connections. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Shaffer, D. W., Nash, P., & Ruis, A. R. (2015). Technology and the new professionalization of teaching. Teachers College Record, 117(12), 1–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sims, C. (2017). Disruptive fixation: School reform and the pitfalls of techno-idealism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. M., & Tidwell, A. S. (2016). The everyday lives of energy transitions: Contested sociotechnical imaginaries in the American West. Social Studies of Science, 46(3), 327–350. doi: 10.1177/0306312716644534
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, C. (2006). The imaginary. Anthropological Theory, 6(3), 322–344. doi: 10.1177/1463499606066891
   Google Scholar
• Trujillo, T. (2014). The modern cult of efficiency: Intermediary organizations and the new scientific management. Educational Policy, 28(2), 207–232. doi: 10.1177/0895904813513148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, M. R., & Mapp, K. L. (2011). A match on dry grass: Community organizing as a catalyst for school reform. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Watters, A. (2014). The monsters of education technology. Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License.
   Google Scholar
• Wentland, A. (2016). Imagining and enacting the future of the German energy transition: Electric vehicles as grid infrastructure. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 29(3), 285–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werts, A. B., & Brewer, C. A. (2015). Reframing the study of policy implementation: Lived experience as politics. Educational Policy, 29(1), 206–229. doi: 10.1177/0895904814559247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, B. (2016). Silicon startup schools: Technocracy, algorithmic imaginaries and venture philanthropy in corporate education reform. Critical Studies in Education, 59, doi:10.1080/17508487.2016.1186710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winner, L. (1996). Who will we be in cyberspace? The Information Society, 12(1), 63–72. doi: 10.1080/019722496129701
   Google Scholar