Clarifying and reframing the neoliberal critique of educational policy using policy process theories

References

• Apple, M. (2006). Educating the ‘right’ way: Markets standards, God, and inequality. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Apple, M. W. (2017). What is present and absent in critical analyses of neoliberalism in education. Peabody Journal of Education, 92(1), 148–153. doi: 10.1080/0161956X.2016.1265344
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (2012). Global education Inc: New policy networks and the neo-liberal imaginary. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Berliner, D. C., & Biddle, B. J. (1995). The manufactured crisis: Myths, fraud, and the attack on America’s public schools. New York: NY Perseus Books.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, W. K., & Sapinski, J. P. (2016). Neoliberalism and the transnational capitalist class. In Handbook of neoliberalism (pp. 67–77). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chubb, J. E., & Moe, T. M. (1990). Politics, markets, and America’s schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Danforth, S. (2016). Social justice and technocracy: Tracing the narratives of inclusive education in the USA. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 37(4), 582–599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudley, G. (2000). New theories and policy process discontinuities. Symposium: Theories of the policy process. Journal of European Public Policy, 7(1), 122–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duménil, G., & Lévy, D. (2004). Capital resurgent: Roots of the neoliberal revolution ( Trans. by D. Jeffers). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, B. (2017). Against neoliberalism as a concept. Capital & Class, 41(3), 435–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easton, D. (1965). A systems analysis of political life. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F. (2003). Reframing public policy: Discursive politics and deliberative practices. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, M. (1997). Public schools: Make them private. Education Economics, 5(3), 341–344.
   Google Scholar
• Giroux, H. A. (2014). Neoliberalism’s war on higher education. Chicago, IL: Haymarket Books.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (2007). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heikkila, T., & Cairney, P. (2018). Comparison of theories of the policy process. In C. M. Weible & P. A. Sabatier (Eds.), Theories of the policy process (4th ed., pp. 301–328). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henig, J. R. (2008). Spin cycle: How research gets used in policy debates: The case of charter schools. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, A. D., Ingold, K., Nohrstedt, D., & Weible, C. M. (2014). Policy change in comparative contexts: Applying the advocacy coalition framework outside of Western Europe and North America. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 16(4), 299–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins-Smith, H., Nohrstedt, D., Weible, C. M., & Sabatier, P. A. (2014). Advocacy coalition framework: Foundations, evolution, and ongoing research. In P. A. Sabatier & C. M. Weible (Eds.), Theories of the policy process (3rd ed., pp. 183–223). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins-Smith, H., & Sabatier, P. A. (1993). Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M. D., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (2009). Trans-subsystem dynamics: Policy topography, mass opinion, and policy change. Policy Studies Journal, 37(1), 37–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. D., & McBeth, M. K. (2010). A narrative policy framework: Clear enough to be wrong? Policy Studies Journal, 38(2), 329–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mundy, S., & Ghali, M. (2012). International and transnational policy actors in education: A review of the research. In G. Sykes, B. Schneider, & D. N. Plank (Eds.), Handbook of education policy research (pp. 717–735). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ndimande, B. S., & Lubienski, C. (Eds.). (2017). Privatization and the education of marginalized children: Policies, impacts and global lessons. New York & London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, W. (2000). When dogs don’t bark. Symposium: Theories of the policy process. Journal of European Public Policy, 7(1), 126–130.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, J. J., Peterson, H. L., Jones, M. D., Garrard, S. P., & Vu, T. (2017). There and back again: A tale of the advocacy coalition framework. Policy Studies Journal, 45(S1), S13–S46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2010). Globalizing education policy. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrik, D. (2017, November 6). Rescuing economics from neoliberalism. Boston Review. Retrieved from http://bostonreview.net/class-inequality/dani-rodrik-rescuing-economics-neoliberalism
   Google Scholar
• Roe, E. (1994). Narrative policy analysis: Theory and practice. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rowlands, J., & Rawolle, S. (2013). Neoliberalism is not a theory of everything: A Bourdieuian analysis of illusion in educational research. Critical Studies in Education, 54(3), 260–272. doi: 10.1080/17508487.2013.830631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. (1999). Theories of the policy process (1st ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shanahan, E. A., Jones, M. D., & McBeth, M. K. (2018). How to conduct a narrative policy framework study. The Social Science Journal, 55(3), 332–345. doi: 10.1016/j.soscij.2017.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanahan, E. A., Jones, M. D., Mcbeth, M. K., & Radaelli, C.M. (2018). The narrative policy framework. In C. M. Weible & P. A. Sabatier (Eds.), Theories of the policy process (4th ed., pp. 173–213). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K. B., & Larimer, C. W. (2017). The public policy theory primer. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, D. A. (1997). Policy paradox: The art of political decision making. New York: WW Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Venugopal, R. (2015). Neoliberalism as concept. Economy and Society, 44(2), 165–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verger, A. (2014). Why do policy-makers adopt global education policies? Toward a research framework on the varying role of ideas in education reform. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 16(2), 14–29.
   Google Scholar
• Weible, C. M. (2018). Instrument constituencies and the advocacy coalition framework: An essay on the comparisons, opportunities, and intersections. Policy and Society, 37(1), 59–73. doi: 10.1080/14494035.2018.1417705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weible, C. M., Sabatier, P. A., Jenkins-Smith, H. C., Nohrstedt, D., Henry, A. D., & DeLeon, P. (2011). A quarter century of the advocacy coalition framework: An introduction to the special issue. Policy Studies Journal, 39(3), 349–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weimer, D. L. (2012). Making education research more policy-analytic. In G. Sykes, B. Schneider, & D. N. Plank (Eds.), Handbook of education policy research (pp. 93–101). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Weiner, L., & Compton, M. (Eds.). (2008). The global assault on teaching, teachers, and their unions: Stories for resistance. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, A. S., Slayton, J., & Scott, J. (2002). Defining democracy in the neoliberal age: Charter school reform and educational consumption. American Educational Research Journal, 39(2), 337–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ACF Applications in education policy domain
   Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., Reckhow, S., & Kelly, A. (2009). How to reform a reform coalition: Outreach, agenda expansion, and brokerage in urban school reform. Policy Studies Journal, 37(4), 717–743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beverwijk, J., Goedegebuure, L., & Huisman, J. (2008). Policy change in nascent subsystems: Mozambican higher education policy, 1993–2003. Policy Sciences, 41(4), 357–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brecher, C., Brazill, C., Weitzman, B. C., & Silver, D. (2010). Understanding the political context of ‘new’ policy issues: The use of the advocacy coalition framework in the case of expanded after-school programs. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(2), 335–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cibulka, J. G., & Myers, N. (2008). Fearful reformers: The institutionalization of the Christian Right in American politics. Educational Policy, 22(1), 155–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeBray, E., Scott, J., Lubienski, C., & Jabbar, H. (2014). Intermediary organizations in charter school policy coalitions: Evidence from New Orleans. Educational Policy, 28(2), 175–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeBray-Pelot, E. H., Lubienski, C. A., & Scott, J. T. (2007). The institutional landscape of interest group politics and school choice. Peabody Journal of Education, 82(2–3), 204–230.
   Google Scholar
• Dougherty, K. J., Nienhusser, H. K., & Vega, B. E. (2010). Undocumented immigrants and state higher education policy: The politics of in-state tuition eligibility in Texas and Arizona. The Review of Higher Education, 34(1), 123–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dougherty, K. J., Natow, R. S., Bork, R. H., Jones, S. M., & Vega, B. E. (2013). Accounting for higher education accountability: Political origins of state performance funding for higher education. Teachers College Record, 115(1), 1–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirst, M. W. (2007). Politics of charter schools: Competing national advocacy coalitions meet local politics. Peabody Journal of Education, 82(2–3), 184–203.
   Google Scholar
• Lugg, C. A., & Robinson, M. N. (2009). Religion, advocacy coalitions, and the politics of US public schooling. Educational Policy, 23(1), 242–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marichal, J. (2009). Frame evolution: A new approach to understanding changes in diversity reforms at public universities in the United States. The Social Science Journal, 46(1), 171–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ness, E. C. (2010). The politics of determining merit aid eligibility criteria: An analysis of the policy process. The Journal of Higher Education, 81(1), 33–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, C. (2008). Uncovering information’s role in the state higher education policy-making process. Educational Policy, 22(6), 875–899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stamelos, G., & Kavasakalis, A. (2013). European higher education area and the introduction of a quality assurance program in Greek universities: Is policy-oriented learning present? CEPS Journal: Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 3(3), 105–124.
   Google Scholar
• Vergari, S. (2007). The politics of charter schools. Educational Policy, 21(1), 15–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NPF Applications in education policy domain
   Google Scholar
• Bragg, D. D., & Soler, M. C. (2017). Policy narratives on applied baccalaureate degrees: Implications for student access to and progression through college in the United States. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 69(1), 123–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertas, N. (2015). Policy narratives and public opinion concerning charter schools. Politics & Policy, 43(3), 426–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto, L. E. (2013). When politics trump evidence: Financial literacy education narratives following the global financial crisis. Journal of Education Policy, 28(1), 95–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGough, D. J., Bedell, C., & Tinkler, B. (2018). Building a dangerous outpost in the Green Mountain State: A case study of educator preparation policymaking. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 26(37), 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Schlaufer, C. (2018). The narrative uses of evidence. Policy Studies Journal, 46(1), 90–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar