327
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Mexican education reform: elucidating dissenting teachers’ resistance

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &

References

  • Anderson, J. E. (2014). Public policymaking (8th ed.). Stanford, Connecticut: Cengage Learning.
  • Apple, M. W. (1982). Education and power (2nd ed). Boston, MA: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  • Arnaut, A., & Giorguli, S. (2010). Introducción general. In A. Arnaut, & S. Giorguli (Eds.), Los grandes problemas de México. VII Educación [The big problems of Mexico. VII education] (pp. 3–7). Ciudad de México: El Colegio de México.
  • Bache, I., & Reardon, L. (2016). The politics and policy of wellbeing: Understanding the rise and significance of a new agenda. Cheltenham, London: Edward Elgar.
  • Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., & Braun, A. (2012). How schools do policy. Policy enactments in secondary schools. London: Routledge.
  • Bocking, P. (2019). The Mexican teachers’ movement in the context of neoliberal education policy and strategies for resistance. Journal of Labor and Society, 22(1), 61–76. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/wusa.12380
  • Bracho González, T., & Zorrilla Fierro, M. (2015). Perspectiva de un gran reto. In National Institute for Educational Evaluation (Ed.), Reforma educativa: Marco normativo [Educational reform: Regulatory framework] (pp. 89–38). Ciudad de México: INEE.
  • Brewer, G. D., & DeLeon, P. (1983). The foundations of policy analysis. Monterey, CA: Brooks, Cole.
  • Bruns, B., & Luque, J. (2015). Great teachers. How to raise student learning in Latin America and the Caribbean. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.
  • Buenfil-Burgos, R. N. (2000). Globalization, education and discourse political analysis: Ambiguity and accountability in research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 13(1), 1–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/095183900235708
  • Carter, N., Bryant-Lukosius, D., DiCenso, A., Blythe, J., & Neville, A. J. (2014). The use of triangulation in qualitative research. Oncology Nursing Forum, 41(5), 545–547. doi:https://doi.org/10.1188/14.ONF.545-547
  • Coburn, C. E. (2001). Collective sensemaking about reading: How teachers mediate reading policy in their professional communities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(2), 145–170. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737023002145
  • Cohen, D., Moffitt, S., & Goldin, S. (2007). Policy and practice. In D. Furhman, D. Cohen, & F. Mosher (Eds.), The state of education policy research (pp. 63–85). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Coll Lebedeff, T. (2009). Alianza por la calidad de la educación. Un ejemplo mexicano [Alliance to improve the quality of education. Quite a Mexican example]. Paper presented at XXVII Congress of Latinoamerican Association of Sociology, Buenos Aires, Argertina. cdsa.aacademica.org/000-062/2066.pdf.
  • Cordero Arroyo, G., & Jiménez Moreno, J. (2018). La política de ingreso a la carrera docente en México: Resultados de una supuesta idoneidad [The policy of entering the teacher career in Mexico: Results of a supposed suitability]. Archivos Analíticos de Políticas Educativas, 26(5), 1–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.26.3463
  • Creighton, M., & Park, H. (2010). Closing the gender gap: Six decades of reform in Mexican education. Comparative Education Review, 54(4), 513–537. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/653702
  • Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
  • Cuevas Cajigas, Y. M. (2015). Representaciones sociales de la reforma de educación básica: La vision de los directivos [Social representations of the education reform: Principals’ perspective]. Perfiles Educativos, XXXVII(147), 1–19.
  • Cuevas Cajigas, Y., & Moreno Olivos, T. (2016). Políticas de evaluación docente de la OCDE: Un acercamiento a la experiencia en la educación básica mexicana [OECD teacher evaluation policies: An approach to experience in Mexican basic education]. Archivos Analíticos de Políticas Educativas, 24(120), 1–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.24.2283
  • Datnow, A., Hubbard, L., & Mehan, M. (2002). Extending education reform: From one school to many. London: Routledge Falmer.
  • De Haldevang, M. (2015, June 1). Mexican teachers protest education reform after government weakens stance. Reuter. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-mexico-reforms/me xican-teachers-protest-education-reform-after-government-weakens-stance-idUSKB N0 OI0AL20150602.
  • Denzin, N. K. (1978). Sociological methods: A sourcebook. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
  • Diario Oficial de la Federación. (2013). Ley general del servicio profesional docente [General law of the professional teaching service]. Ciudad de México: Diario Oficial de la Federación.
  • Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
  • Fernandez-Martínez, M. (2014). Los desafíos de la implementación de la reforma educativa y la perspectiva estatal. In M. Fernandez-Martínez (Ed.), Las reformas y los estados [The reforms and the states] (pp. 46–67). Ciudad de México: IMCO.
  • Gale, T. (2007). Critical policy sociology: Histography, archaeology and genealogy as methods of policy analysis. In S. Ball, I. Goodson, & M. Maguire (Eds.), Education, globalization and new times (pp. 148–166). London: Routledge.
  • Gil Antón, M. (2018). La reforma educativa. Fracturas estructurales [The educational reform: Structural fractures]. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 46(184), 303–321. Retrieved from https://www.comie.org.mx/revista/v2018/rmie/index.php/nrmie/article/vi ew/1149.
  • Gosling, T., & Brooks, R. (2004). Three years of from the Commission on public Private Partnerships. In T. Gosling (Ed.), 3 steps forward, 2 steps back (pp. 3–16). New York, NY: Emphasis.
  • Hennink, M. M., Kaiser, B. N., & Marconi, V. C. (2017). Code saturation versus meaning saturation: How many interviews are enough? Qualitative Health Research, 27(4), 591–608. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316665344
  • Hernández Navarro, L. (2009). Cero en conducta: Resistencia magisterial y privatización de la educación pública [Zero in conduct: Teacher resistance and privatization of public education]. El Cotidiano, 24(154), 5–16. Retrieved from http://www.redalyc.or g/src/Ini cio/ArtPdfRed.jsp?Cve=32512736002.
  • Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
  • Keck, C. S. (2015). Education reform in Mexico: Neo-liberalism, ‘schizophrenia’ and the ethical challenge within the agendas for educational change. Sinética Revista Electrónica de Educación, 45, 1–17. Retrieved from scielo.org.mx/pdf/sine/n45a12.pdf.
  • Kemper, E., Stringfield, S., & Teddlie, C. (2016). Mixed methods sampling strategies in social science research. In A. Tashakkori, & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 273–298). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  • Khan, S. R. (2012). The sociology of elites. Annual Review of Sociology, 38(1), 361–377. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071811-145542
  • Knoll, A. (2013). Despite repression, Mexican teachers continue to resist education reform. Retrieved from. https://truthout.org/articles/despite-repression-mexican-teachers-continue-to resist-education-reform/.
  • Lasswell, H. D. (1956). The decision process: Seven categories of functional analysis. College Park, MD: University of Maryland Press.
  • Levinson, B. A. U., Blackwood, U. J., & Cross, V. J. (2013). Recipient, agents, or partners? The contradictions of teacher participation in Mexican secondary education reform. Journal of Educational Change, 14(1), 1–27. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-012-9193-2
  • Levinson, B. A. U., Sutton, M., & Winstead, T. (2009). Education policy as a practice of power: Theoretical tools, ethnographic methods, democratic options. Educational Policy, 23(6), 767–795. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904808320676
  • Moreno, C. I. (2017). Las reformas en educación pública en México: Rupturas y continuidades [Public higher education reforms in Mexico: Continuities and ruptures]. Revista de la Educación Superior, 46(182), 27–44. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resu.2017.03.001
  • Navarro Gallegos, C. (2009). La alianza por la calidad de la educación en México. Pacto sindical-gubernamental para apuntalar el modelo educativo excluyente y privatizador [The alliance for the quality of the education in Mexico. Covenant union-government for prop up the educational model excluding and privatizing]. Paper presented at VII Jornadas de Sociología, Universidad de Buenos Aires. Retrieved from cdsa.academica.or g/000-062/2067.pdf.
  • Navarro Gallegos, C. (2015). Ayotzinapa y la estirpe insumisa del normalismo rural [Ayotzinapa and the insumisa line of rural normalism]. El Cotidiano, 189(1), 95–105. Retrieved from redalyc.org/pdf/325/32533819013.pdf.
  • O’Reilly, M., & Parker, M. (2013). Unsatisfactory saturation: A critical exploration of the notion of satured sample sizes in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 13(3), 190–197. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112446106
  • Ornelas, C. (2014). Yet another education reform in Mexico. Journal of International Cooperation in Education, 16(2), 197–213. Retrieved from homehiroshima-u.ac.jp/cice/ uploads/2014/10/16-2-12.pdf.
  • Ornelas, C. (2018). Mexican educational reform: Politics in the frontline. In J. Zajda (Ed.), Globalisation and education reforms, globalisation, comparative education and policy research (pp. 137–153). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
  • Patton, M. Q. (1999). Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Services Research, 34(5), 1189–1208.
  • Peters, B. G. (2016). American public policy: Promise and performance (10th ed). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
  • Ramírez Plascencia, D. (2018). Education reform, teacher resistance, and social media activism in Mexico. The Educational Forum, 82(3), 321–334. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2018.1457748
  • Rapley, T. (2014). Sampling strategies in qualitative research. In U. Flick (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis (pp. 49–63). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  • Reis, E. P., & Moore, M. (2005). Elites, perceptions and poverties. In E. P. Reis, & M. Moore (Eds.), Elite perceptions of poverty and inequality (pp. 1–36). New York, NY: Zed Brooks.
  • Ripley, R. (1985). Stages of the policy process. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Rizvi, F., & Kemmis, S. (1987). Dilemmas for reform. Geelong: Deakin Institute for Studies in Education.
  • Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2010). Globalizing education policy. Milton Park, Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Rojas, J. (2018). The education reform at the subnational level: Harmony and dissonance. Convergencia Revista de las Ciencias Sociales, 78(1), 43–70. doi:https://doi.org/10.29101/crcs.v25i78.9169
  • Sall, D., & Khan, S. (2017). What elite theory should have learned, and can still learn, from W. E. B. DuBois. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 40(3), 512–514. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0419870.2017.1248999
  • Santiago, P., McGregor, I., Nusche, D., Ravela, P., & Toledo, D. (2012). Revisiones de la OCDE sobre la evaluación en México [OECD reviews on evaluation in Mexico]. París, Francia: OECD.
  • Scott, D., Posner, C. M., Martin, C., & Guzmán, E. (2018). Education system in Mexico. London: UCL Press. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/j.cct1c4tg5.
  • Selwyn, B. (2016). Elite development theory: A labour-centered critique. Third World Quarterly, 37(5), 781–799. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.1120156
  • Shipan, C. R., & Volden, C. (2008). The mechanisms of policy diffusion. American Journal of Political Science, 52(4), 40–66. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00346.x
  • Spillane, J. P., Reiser, B. J., & Reimer, T. (2002). Policy implementation and cognition: Reframing and refocusing implementation research. Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 387–431. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543072003387
  • Spillane, J. P., & Zeuli, J. S. (1999). Reform and teaching: Exploring patterns of practice in the context of national and state mathematics reforms. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21(1), 1–27. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/0623737021001001
  • Stein, R., & Swedenberg, T. (2004). Popular culture, relational history, and the question of power in Palestine and Israel. Journal of Palestine Studies, 33(4), 5–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543072003387
  • Street, S. (2001). When politics becomes pedagogy: Oppositional discourse as policy in Mexican teachers’ struggles for union democracy. In M. Sutton, & B. A. U. Levinson (Eds.), Policy as practice: Toward a comparative sociocultural analysis of educational policy (pp. 145–166). Westport, CT: Ablex.
  • Tromp, R. E. (2016). The politics of competencies: Policy trajectory study of the re-contextualization of the 2009-2011 competency-bases [based] curricular reform of Mexican primary education (Doctoral Theses [Thesis]). University of East Anglia. https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/63130/.
  • Zebadúa, E. (2011, January 4). Reforma educativa en México [Educational reform in Mexico]. La Crónica. Retrieved from http://www.cronica.com.mx/notas/ 2011/556315.htm.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.