1,089
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The affective economy of feminist leadership in Finnish universities: class-based knowledge for navigating neoliberalism and neuroliberalism

&

References

  • ACAS. (2019). Age discrimination: Key points for the workplace. Retrieved 9 January 2020. https://archive.acas.org.uk/media/6118/Age-discrimination-key-points-for-the-workplace/pdf/Age_discrimination_key_points_for_the_workplace.pdf
  • Ahmed, S. (2010). The promise of happiness. London: Duke University Press.
  • Ahmed, S. (2012). On being included: Racism and diversity in institutional life. Durham: Duke University Press.
  • Alliance of Women in Academia. (2018, 13 May). Tackling sexual harassment and bullying in Higher Education: Towards a more comprehensive response. Retrieved 11 June 2019. LSE Blogspot: Engenderings. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/gender/2018/05/30/tackling-sexual-harassment-and-bullying-in-higher-education-towards-a-more-comprehensive-policy-response/
  • Andersen, L. C., & Aarseth, H. (2012). Den likestilte familien i et klasseperspektiv. Ellingsæter, Anne Lise og Karin Widerberg (red.). Velferdsstatens familier. Nye sosiologiske perspektiver. [Families of the welfare state: New sociological perspectives]. Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk. S, 191–214.
  • Bacevic, J. (2019). Knowing neoliberalism. Social Epistemology, 33(4), 380–439.
  • Barbezat, D., & Hughes, J. (2005). Salary structure effects and gender pay gap in academia. Research in Higher Education, 46(6), 621–640.
  • Barrable, A., Papadatou-Pastou, M., & Tzotzoli, P. (2018). Supporting mental health, wellbeing and study skills in higher education. International Journal of Mental Health Systems, doi:10.1186/s13033-018-0233-z
  • Begum, N., & Saini, R. (2019). Decolonising the curriculum. Political Studies Review, 17(2), 196–201. doi:10.1177/1478929918808459
  • Berlant, L. (2011). Cruel optimism. London: Duke University Press.
  • Blackmore, J. (2017). Leadership in higher education: A critical feminist perspective on global restructuring. In S. Wright & C. Shore (Eds.), Death of the public university? (pp. 90–113). New York: Berghahn Press.
  • Bozalek, V., Leibowitz, B., Carolissen, R., & Boler, M. (2014). Discerning critical hope in educational practices. London: Routledge.
  • Brown, W. (2015). Undoing the demos neoliberalism’s stealth revolution. New York: Zone Books.
  • Brunila, K., & Valero, P. (2018). Anxiety and the making of research(ing) subjects in neo-liberal academia. Subjectivity, 11(1), 74–89.
  • Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble. London: Routledge.
  • Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter. London: Routledge.
  • Butler, J. (1997). The psychic life of power: Theories in subjection. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2016). Thematic analysis. In E. Lyons & A. Coyle (Eds.), Analysing qualitative data in psychology (2nd ed., pp. 84–103). London: Sage.
  • Coady, D. (2010). Two concepts of epistemic injustice. Episteme; Rivista Critica Di Storia Delle Scienze Mediche E Biologiche, 7(2), 101–113.
  • Colebrook, C. (2010). Toxic feminism: Hope and hopelessness after feminism. Journal for Cultural Research, 14(4), 323–335.
  • Coleman, R., & Ferreday, D. (2010). Introduction: Hope and feminist theory. Journal for Cultural Research, 14(4), 313–321.
  • Connell, R. (2007). Southern theory. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Cooper, D. (2014). Everyday utopias. The conceptual life of promising spaces. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
  • Coughlan, S. (2019). Dogs ‘prevent stressed students dropping out’. Retrieved 9 January 2020. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-48806935
  • Deutsch, F. (2007). Undoing gender. Gender and Society, 21(1), 106–127.
  • Dinshaw, C., Edelman, L., Ferguson, R., Freccero, C., Freeman, E., Halberstam, J., … Tan Hoang, N. (2007). Theorizing queer temporalities: A roundtable discussion. GLQ A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 13, doi:10.1215/10642684-2006-030
  • Dotson, K. (2011). Tracking epistemic violence, tracking practices of silencing. Hypatia: Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 26(2), 236–257.
  • Dyhouse, C. (1995). No distinction of sex? Women in British universities 1870–1939. London: Taylor and Francis.
  • Ehrenreich, B. (2009). Bright-sided: How the relentless promotion of positive thinking has undermined America. New York: Metropolitan Books.
  • Eisenstein, H. (2009). Feminism seduced. London: Routledge.
  • Freeman, E. (2010). Time binds: Queer temporalities, queer histories. London: Duke University Press.
  • Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Gabriel, D., & Tate, S. A. (2018). Inside the ivory tower: Narratives of women of colour surviving and thriving in British academia. London: Trentham Books/UCL IOE Press.
  • Gill, R., & Orgad, S. (2017). Confidence culture and the remaking of feminism. New Formations, 91, 16–34.
  • Grasswick, H. (2017). Epistemic injustice in science. In I. A. Kidd, J. Medina, & G. Pohlhaus (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of epistemic injustice (pp. 313–324). London: Routledge.
  • Haraway, D. (1985). A manifesto for cyborgs: Science, technology, and socialist feminism in the 1980s. Socialist Review, 15, 65–107.
  • Henley, J., & Roy, E. A. (2020). Are female leaders more successful at managing the coronavirus crisis? Retrieved 12 October 2020. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/25/why-do-female-leaders-seem-to-be-more-successful-at-managing-the-coronavirus-crisis
  • Hey, V. (2003). Joining the club? Academia and working-class femininities. Gender and Education, 15(3), 319–336.
  • Hey, V., Leaney, S., & Leyton, D. (2020). The un/methodology of ‘theoretical intuitions’: Resources of generations gone before: Thinking and feeling class. Discourse, 42(1), doi:10.1080/01596306.2020.1834953
  • Hines, S. (2018). Is gender fluid? A primer for the 21st century. London, NY: Thames and Hudson.
  • Holli, A. M., & Kantola, J. (2007). State feminism, Finnish style: Strong policies clash with implementation problems. In J. Outshoorn & J. Kantola (Eds.), Changing state feminism (pp. 82–101). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Husu, L. (2000). Gender discrimination in the promised land of gender equality. Higher Education in Europe, 25(2), 221–228. doi:10.1080/713669257
  • Husu, L., et al. (2004). Gate-keeping, gender equality and scientific excellence. In D. Al-Khudhairy (Ed.), Gender and excellence in the making (pp. 69–76). Brussels: European Commission.
  • Irni, S. (2010). Ageing apparatuses at work: Transdisciplinary negotiations of sex, age and materiality. Åbo: Åbo/ Turku: Åbo Akademi University Press.
  • Isin, E. F. (2004). The neurotic citizen. Citizenship Studies, 8(3), 217–235.
  • Jones, L., & Maguire, M. (2020). Investing ourselves: The role of space and place in being a working class female academic. Discourse, 42(1), doi:10.1080/01596306.2020.1767937
  • Käyhkö, M. (2015). Working-class girls in a foreign land. Social class and settling into university in a cross-current between two cultures. Gender and Education, 27(4), 445–460.
  • Keskinen, S., Tuori, S., Irni, S., & Mulinari, D. (2016). Complying with colonialism: Gender, race and ethnicity in the Nordic region. London: Routledge.
  • King, N., & Brooks, J. (2017). Thematic analysis in organisational research. In C. Cassell, A. L. Cunliffe, & G. Grandy (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of qualitative business and management research methods (pp. 219–236). London: Sage.
  • Koskinen, I., & Rolin, K. (2019). Scientific/intellectual movements remedying epistemic injustice: The case of Indigenous studies. Philosophy of Science, 86(5), 1052–1063.
  • Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (2001). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics (2nd edition). London: Verso.
  • Laslett, P. (1996). A fresh map of life. The emergence of the third age (2nd edition). Houndmills: Macmillan Press.
  • Laugerud, S. (2019). Common sense, (ab)normality and bodies in Norwegian rape verdicts. NORA: Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, doi:10.1080/08038740.2019.1697748
  • Ljunggren, J. (2017). Elitist egalitarianism: Negotiating identity in the Norwegian cultural elite. Sociology, 51(3), 559–574.
  • Lund, R. (2018). The social organisation of boasting in the neoliberal university. Gender and Education, 32(4), 466–485. doi:10.1080/09540253.2018.1482412
  • Madsen, S. (2017). Handbook of research on gender and leadership. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Manning, E., & Massumi, B. (2014). Thought in the act: Passages in the ecology of experience. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press.
  • Massumi, B. (2002). Navigating movements. In M. Zournazi (Ed.), Hope: New philosophies for change (pp. 210–242). Sydney: Pluto Press.
  • McKeen, C., & Bujaki, M. (2007). Gender and mentoring. In B. R. Ragins & K. E. Kram (Eds.), The Handbook of mentoring at work: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 197–222). Los Angeles: Sage.
  • McRobbie, A. (2004). Post-feminism and popular culture. Feminist Media Studies, 4(3), 255–264.
  • Melin, H. (2020). Finland is still a class society. Retrieved 2 October 2020. https://alusta.uta.fi/2020/02/21/finland-is-still-a-class-society/
  • Mintz, E., & Rothblum, E. (2013). Lesbians in academia: Degrees of freedom. London: Routledge.
  • Moratti, S. (2018). What’s in a word? On the use of metaphors to describe the careers of women academics. Gender and Education, doi:10.1080/09540253.2018.1533927
  • Morganroth Gullette, M. (1997). Declining to decline: Cultural combat and the politics of the mid-life. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
  • Morley, L. (2011). Sex, grades and power in Higher Education in Ghana and Tanzania. Cambridge Journal of Education, 41(1), 101–115.
  • Morley, L. (2013). Women and Higher Education leadership: Absences and aspirations. Stimulus Paper for the Leadership Foundation for Higher Education. https://www.lfhe.ac.uk/en/components/publication.cfm/MorleyST10
  • Morley, L. (2018). Gender in the neoliberal research economy: An enervating and exclusionary entanglement? In H. Kahlert (Ed.), Gender studies and the new academic governance. Global challenges, glocal dynamics, and local impacts (pp. 15–40). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
  • Morley, L., Angervall, P., Berggren, C., & Dodillet, S. (2018). Re-purposing Fika: Rest, recreation or regulation in the neoliberalised Swedish university? European Journal of Higher Education, 8(4), 400–414.
  • Morley, L., & Crossouard, B. (2016a). Gender in the neoliberalised global academy: The affective economy of women and leadership in South Asia. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 37(1), 149–168.
  • Morley, L., & Crossouard, B. (2016b). Rejection, refusal, reluctance, revisioning: Women in higher education leadership in South Asia. Studies in Higher Education, 46(5), 801–814.
  • Muňoz, J. E. (1999). Disidentifications: Queers of colour and the performance of politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • OECD. (2019). Income inequality. Retrieved 2 November 2020. https://data.oecd.org/inequality/income-inequality.htm
  • Pedersen, O. K. (2011). Konkurrencestaten, 1. udgave, 5. oplag. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag. [The Competition State.].
  • Pereira, M. M. (2017). Power, knowledge and feminist scholarship. London: Routledge.
  • Port, C. (2012). No future? Aging, temporality, history, and reverse chronologies. Occasion: Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities, 4(May 31), http://occasion.stanford.edu/node/98
  • Rottenberg, C. (2018). The rise of neoliberal feminism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Segal, L. (2013). Out of time: The pleasures and perils of ageing. London: Verso.
  • Shahjahan, R. (2019). On ‘being for others’: Time and shame in the neoliberal academy. Journal of Education Policy, doi:10.1080/02680939.2019.1629027
  • Skeggs, B. (2004). Class, self, culture. London: Routledge.
  • Statistics Finland. (2018). Gender equality in Finland, 2018. Helsinki: Statistics Finland.
  • Stengers, I., & Muecke, S. (2018). Another science is possible: A manifesto for slow science. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Van den Brink, M., Benschop, Y., & Jansen, W. (2010). Transparency in academic recruitment: A problematic tool for gender equality? Organization Studies, 31(11), 1459–1483.
  • Whitehead, M., Jones, R., Lilley, R., Howell, R., & Pykett, J. (2018). Neuroliberalism: Cognition, context, and the geographical bounding of rationality. Progress in Human Geography, 43(4), 632–649.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.