Affective enactments: the pedagogy and cultural politics of reading in an Australian classroom

References

• Ahmed, S. (2004a). Affective economies. Social Text, 22(2), 117–139.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, S. (2004b). The cultural politics of emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, S. (2010a). Happy objects. In M. Gregg & G. J. Seigworth (Eds.), The affect theory reader (pp. 29–51). Durham & London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, S. (2010b). Orientations matter. In D. Coole & S. Frost (Eds.), New materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics (pp. 234–257). Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anwaruddin, S. M. (2016). Why critical literacy should turn to ‘the affective turn’: Making a case for critical affective literacy. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 37(3), 381–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berlant, L. (2011). Cruel optimism. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burnett, C., & Merchant, G. (2018a). Affective encounters: Enchantment and the possibility of reading for pleasure. Literacy, 52(2), 62–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnett, C., & Merchant, G. (2018b). Literacy-as-event: Accounting for relationality in literacy research. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education. doi: 10.1080/01596306.2018.1460318
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of ‘sex’. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cvetkovich, A. (2012). Depression: A public feeling. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Kretser, M. (2003). The Hamilton case. Milsons Point: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Downes, J. (2012). Review of the promise of happiness (2010) by Sara Ahmed. Graduate Journal of Social Science, 9(2), 231–234. Retrieved from: http://gjss.org/sites/default/files/issues/chapters/bookreviews/Journal-09-02–12- Downes.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Dutro, E. (2019). Visceral literacies, political intensities: Affect as critical potential in literacy research and practice. In K. M. Leander & C. Ehret (Eds.), Affect in literacy learning and teaching: Pedagogies, politics and coming to know (pp. 73–91). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ehret, C., & Leander, K. (2019). Introduction. In K. Leander & C. Ehret (Eds.), Affect in literacy learning and teaching: Pedagogies, politics and coming to know (pp. 1–19). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrkamp, P. (2006). ‘We Turks are no Germans’: Assimilation discourses and the dialectical construction of identities in Germany. Environment and Planning A, 38(9), 1673–1692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, A. (2002). Disaffected. Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 16(3), 335–341.
   Google Scholar
• Green, B. (2009). The ‘primacy of practice’ and the problem of representation. In B. Green & S. Kemmis (Eds.), Understanding and researching professional practice (pp. 39–54). Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Gregg, M., & Seigworth, G. J. (2010). The affect theory reader. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gunew, S. M. (2017). Post-multicultural writers as neo-cosmopolitan mediators. London, New York: Anthem Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, A. Y., & Mazzei, L. A. (2012). Thinking with theory in qualitative research: Viewing data across multiple perspectives. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Janks, H. (2010). Literacy and power. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Keegan, P. (2021). Critical affective civic literacy: A framework for attending to political emotion in the social studies classroom. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 45(1), 15–24.
   Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Leander, K., & Ehret, C. (2019). Affect in literacy learning and teaching: Pedagogies, politics and coming to know. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lenters, K., & McDermott, M. (2019). Affect, embodiment, and place in critical literacy: Assembling theory and practice. Milton: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Macken-Horarik, M. (2014). Making productive use of four models of school English: A case study revisited. English in Australia, 49(3), 7–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLure, M. (2010). The offence of theory. Journal of Education Policy, 25(2), 277–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the virtual. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Massumi, B. (2015). Politics of affect. Cambridge, UK; Malden, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• McLeod, J. (2017). Reframing responsibility in an era of responsibilisation: Education, feminist ethics. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 38(1), 43–56. doi: 10.1080/0159630.2015.1104851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyano Ariza, S. (2020). Affect theory with literature and art: Between and beyond representation. Athenea Digital: Revista de Pensamiento e Investigación Social, 20(2), 0006.
   Google Scholar
• Mulcahy, D. (2011). Assembling the ‘accomplished’ teacher: The performativity and politics of professional teaching standards. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(S1), 94–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulcahy, D. (2016). ‘Sticky’ learning: Assembling bodies, objects and affects at the museum and beyond. In J. Coffey, S. Budgeon, & H. Cahill (Eds.), Learning bodies: The body in youth and childhood studies (pp. 207–222). Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Probyn, E. (2005). Blush: Faces of shame. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schaefer, D. O. (2019). The evolution of affect theory: The humanities, the sciences, and the study of power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitz, S., & Ahmed, S. (2014). Affect/emotion: Orientation matters. A conversation between Sigrid Schmitz and Sara Ahmed. FZG–Freiburger Zeitschrift für GeschlechterStudien, 20(2), 13–14.
   Google Scholar
• Soutphommasane, T. (2016). The success of Australia’s multiculturalism. Retrieved from: www.humanrights.gov.au/news/speeches/success-australia-s-multiculturalism.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. (1995). Philosophical arguments. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. (2020). What it means to be a ‘true American’: Ethnonationalism and voting in the 2016 US presidential election. Nations and Nationalism, 1–19. doi:10.111/nana.12638
   Google Scholar
• Tomkins, S. S. (1991). Affect, imagery, consciousness, Vol. 3: The negative affects: Anger and fear. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Truman, S. E., Hackett, A., Pahl, K., McLean Davies, L., & Escott, H. (2021). The capaciousness of no: Affective refusals as literacy practices. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(2), 223–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins, M. (2016). Gauging the affective: Becoming attuned to its impact in education. In M. Zembylas & P. A. Schutz (Eds.), Methodological advances in research on emotion and education (pp. 71–81). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Willig, C. (2003). Discourse analysis. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 160–186). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Young, J. O. (2011). Representation in literature. Literature & Aesthetics, 9(1), 127–143.
   Google Scholar
• Zembylas, M. (2014). Rethinking race and racism as technologies of affect: Theorizing the implications for anti-racist politics and practice in education. Race, Ethnicity and Education, 18(2), 145–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar