Inheritance, disobedience and speculation in pedagogic practice

References

• Agamben, G. (1998). Homo sacer: Sovereign power and bare life. Stanford: Stanford UP.
   Google Scholar
• Altay, C. (2014). Rogue game: An architecture of transgression. In L. Rice, & D. Littlefield (Eds.), Transgression: Towards and expanded field of architecture (pp. 207–213). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, D. (2011). Art, equality and learning: Pedagogies against the state. Rotterdam, Boston: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, D. (forthcoming book). Pedagogies of taking care: Art, pedagogy and the gift of otherness.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, V. (2017). On Isabelle Stengers’ cosmopolitics: A speculative adventure. In A. Wilkie, M. Savransky, & M. Rosengarten (Eds.), Speculative research: The lure of possible futures (pp. 187–197). London & New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Berlant, L. (2016). The commons: Infrastructures for troubling times. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 34(3), 393–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buck-Morss, S. (2010). The second time as farce … historical pragmatics and the untimely present. In C. Douzinas, & S. Zizek (Eds.), The idea of communism (pp. 67–80). London, New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Carstens, D. (2020). Toward a speculative pedagogy. CriSTaL Critical Studies in Teaching & Learning, 8(SI), 75–91.
   Google Scholar
• De La Cadena, M., & Blaser, M. (Eds.). (2018). A world of many worlds. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (2004). Difference and repetition. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1988). A thousand plateaus. London: Athlone Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1994). What is philosophy? London and New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gerlach, J. (2014). Lines, contours and legends. Coordinates for vernacular mapping. Progress in Human Geography, 38(1), 22–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hampe, M. (2018). What philosophy is for. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspectives. Feminist Studies, 14, 575–599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harney, S., & Moten, F. (2013). The undercommons, fugitive planning and black study. New York: Minor Compositions.
   Google Scholar
• James, W. (1897/1956). The will to believe, and other essays in popular philosophy. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kuby, C. R., & Christ, C. C. (2020). Speculative pedagogies of qualitative inquiry. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1990). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mbembe, A. (2003). Necropolitics (translated by libby meintjes). Public Culture, 15(1), 11–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranciere, J. (2010). Dissensus: On politics and aesthetics. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Savransky, M. (2017). The wager of an unfinished present. In A. Wilkie, M. Savransky, & M. Rosengarten (Eds.), Speculative research: The lure of possible futures (pp. 25–38). London & New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shaviro, S. (2009). Without criteria: Kant, whitehead, deleuze, and aesthetics. Cambridge Mas: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spinoza, B. (1996). Ethics. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Stengers, I. (2004). The cosmopolitical proposal. Wordpress, on-line.
   Google Scholar
• Stengers, I. (2005a). An ecology of practices. Cultural Studies Review, 11(1), 183–196.
   Google Scholar
• Stengers, I. (2005b). The cosmopolitical proposal. In B. Latour & P. Weibel (Eds.), Making things public: Atmospheres of democracy (pp. 994–1003). Cambridge, MA: London: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stengers, I. (2010). The care of the possible. Interview by Bordeleau, E. In SCAPEGOAT: Architecture/Landscape/Political Economy, Issue 1, ‘Service’, pp. 12–17.
   Google Scholar
• Stengers, I. (2011). Comparison as a matter of concern. Common Knowledge, 17(1), 48–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stengers, I. (2014). Speculative philosophy and the art of dramatization. In R. Faber & A. Goffey (Eds.), The allure of things: Process and object in contemporary philosophy (pp. 188–217). London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, H. E. (1997). The fallacy of misplaced concreteness: Its importance of critical and creative inquiry. Interchange, 28(2), 219–230.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, A. N. (1938). Modes of thought. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, A. N. (1997). Science and the modern world. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar