319
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Identifying top researchers in highly metricized academia: two discursive strategies of senior officials in Poland

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Angervall, P. (2015). The excellent researcher. Policy Futures in Education, 14(2), 225–237. doi:10.1177/1478210315614747
  • Antonowicz, D., Kohoutek, J., Pinheiro, R., & Hladchenko, M. (2017). The roads of ‘excellence’ in Central and Eastern Europe. European Educational Research Journal, 16(5), 547–567. doi:10.1177/1474904116683186
  • Antonowicz, D., Kulczycki, E., & Budzanowska, A. (2020). Breaking the deadlock of mistrust? A participative model of the structural reforms in higher education in Poland. Higher Education Quarterly. doi:10.1111/hequ.12254
  • Berman, E. P. (2014). Not just neoliberalism: Economization in US science and technology policy. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 39(3), 397–431. doi:10.1177/0162243913509123
  • Bourdieu, P. (1984). Homo academicus. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Cannizzo, F. (2015). Academic subjectivities: Governmentality and self-development in higher education. Foucault Studies, 11(2), 199–217. doi:10.22439/fs.v0i0.4937
  • Espeland, W. N., & Stevens, M. L. (2008). A sociology of quantification. European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie, 49(3), 401–436. doi:10.1017/S0003975609000150
  • Falkowski, T., & Ostrowicka, H. (2021). Ethicalisation of higher education reform: The strategic integration of academic discourse on scholarly ethos. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 53(5), 479–491. doi:10.1080/00131857.2020.1740684
  • Friedman, S. (2016). Habitus clivé and the emotional imprint of social mobility. The Sociological Review, 64(1), 129–147.
  • Godin, B. (2009). The value of science: Changing conceptions of scientific productivity, 1869 to circa 1970. Social Science Information, 48(4), 547–586. doi:10.1177/0539018409344475
  • Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Hazelkorn, E. (2015). Rankings and the reshaping of higher education: The battle for world-class excellence (2nd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
  • Hicks, D. (2012). Performance-based university research funding systems. Research Policy, 41(2), 251–261. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.09.007
  • Kulczycki, E. (2017). Assessing publications through a bibliometric indicator: The case of comprehensive evaluation of scientific units in Poland. Research Evaluation, 26(1), 41–52. doi:10.1093/reseval/rvw023
  • Kulczycki, E., Korzeń, M., & Korytkowski, P. (2017). Toward an excellence-based research funding system: Evidence from Poland. Journal of Informetrics, 11(1), 282–298. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2017.01.001
  • Kulczycki, E., Rozkosz, E. A., Szadkowski, K., Ciereszko, K., Hołowiecki, M., & Krawczyk, F. (2020). Local use of metrics for the research assessment of academics: The case of Poland. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 1–19. doi:10.1080/1360080X.2020.1846243
  • Kwiek, M. (2018). High research productivity in vertically undifferentiated higher education systems: Who are the top performers? Scientometrics, 115(1), 415–462. doi:10.1007/s11192-018-2644-7
  • Meyer, M. (2006). Are patenting scientists the better scholars? An exploratory comparison of inventor-authors with their non-inventing peers in nano-science and technology. Research Policy, 35(10), 1646–1662. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.013
  • Mollis, M., & Marginson, S. (2002). The assessment of universities in Argentina and Australia: Between autonomy and heteronomy. Higher Education, 43(3), 311–330. doi:10.1023/A:1014603823622
  • Mouritzen, P. E., & Opstrup, N. (2020). Performance management at universities: The Danish bibliometric research indicator at work. Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-21325-1
  • Muller, J. Z. (2018). The tyranny of metrics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Münch, R. (2013). Academic capitalism: Universities in the global struggle for excellence. New York: Routledge.
  • Olssen, M., & Peters, M. A. (2005). Neoliberalism, higher education and the knowledge economy: From the free market to knowledge capitalism. Journal of Education Policy, 20(3), 313–345. doi:10.1080/02680930500108718
  • Ostrowicka, H. (2020). Economization of discourse on education and pedagogization of economic problems: Media debate on higher education reform in Poland. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 1–15. doi:10.1080/01596306.2020.1811957
  • Palali, A., van Elk, R., Bolhaar, J., & Rud, I. (2018). Are good researchers also good teachers? The relationship between research quality and teaching quality. Economics of Education Review, 64, 40–49. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2018.03.011
  • Rider, S. (2013). Higher heteronomy: Thinking through modern university education. In S. Rider, Y. Hasselberg, & A. Waluszewski (Eds.), Transformations in research, higher education and the academic market: The breakdown of scientific thought (pp. 171–186). Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-5249-8_12
  • Shaw, M. A. (2019). Public accountability versus academic independence: Tensions of public higher education governance in Poland. Studies in Higher Education, 44(12), 2235–2248.
  • Smith, S., Ward, V., & House, A. (2011). ‘Impact’ in the proposals for the UK’s research excellence framework: Shifting the boundaries of academic autonomy. Research Policy, 40(10), 1369–1379. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.026
  • Stankiewicz, Ł. (2020). Discourse, resistance and organization: Critical discourse analysis of the ‘revolt of the humanities’ in Poland. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education. doi:10.1080/01596306.2020.1830032
  • Tomicic, A. (2019). American dream, Humboldtian nightmare: Reflections on the remodelled values of a neoliberalized academia. Policy Futures in Education, 17(8), 1057–1077. doi:10.1177/1478210319834825
  • Tusting, K. (2018). The genre regime of research evaluation: Contradictory systems of value around academics’ writing. Language and Education, 32(6), 477–493. doi:10.1080/09500782.2018.1505905
  • Weber, M. (1978). Bureaucracy. In M. Weber (Ed.), Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology (pp. 956–1005). Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Wodak, R. (2001). The discourse–historical approach. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 63–94). London: SAGE Publications.
  • Wylie, C. D. (2018). ‘I just love research’: Beliefs about what makes researchers successful. Social Epistemology, 32(4), 262–271. doi:10.1080/02691728.2018.1458349

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.