501
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

International assessments as the comparative desires and the distributions of differences: infrastructures and coloniality

References

  • Barton, D., Farrell, D., & Mourshed, M. (2013). Education to employment: Designing a system that works. Retrieved from http://www.mckinsey.com/industries/social-sector/our-insights/education-to-employment-designing-a-system-that-works
  • Bürgi, R. (2016). The free world and the cult of expertise: The rise of the OECD’s educationalizing technocracy. International Journal of Higher Education, 6(2), 159–179.
  • Carvalho, L. M. (2018). International assessments and its expertise fabricating expert knowledge for policy. In S. Lindblad, D. Pettersson, & T. Popkewitz (Eds.), Education by the numbers and the making of society: The expertise of international assessments (pp. 110–126). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Daston, L. (1995). Classical probability in the enlightenment. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Daston, L. (2019). Against nature. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1980/1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. (B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Desrosirères, A. (1993/1998). The politics of large numbers: A history of statistical reasoning. (C. Naish, Trans.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Dreyer, K., Cosma, A., Hlinková, I., & Hengge, J. (2018). Lessons learned from the PISA4U pilot. The online programme for school improvement. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/aboutpisa/PISA4U-Pilot-Report.pdf. Retrieved May 31, 2020, from candena GmbH in association with the OECD https://www.oecd.org/pisa/aboutpisa/PISA4U-Pilot-Report.pdf
  • Easton, D. (1965). A systems analysis of political life. New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Epple, A., Erhart, W., & Grave, J. (2020). Practices of comparing: Towards a new understanding of a fundamental human practice. Bielefeld, Germany: Bielefield University Press.
  • Govorova, E., Benítez, I., & Muñiz, J. (2020). How schools affect student well-being: A cross-cultural approach in 35 OECD countries. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(431), 1–14, doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00431
  • Grek, S. (2020). Beyond the standardization vs contextualization debate: The role of the OECD in European education governance. In D. Dolowitz, M. Hadjiisky, & R. Normand (Eds.), Shaping policy agendas: Micro-politics of economic international organizations (pp. 57–76). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
  • Hacking, I. (1990). The taming of chance. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hacking, I. (1992). Statistical language, statistical truth and statistical reason: The self-authentification of a style of scientific reasoning. In E. McMullin (Ed.), The social dimensions of science (pp. 130–157). Notre Dame, Ind: University of Notre Dame Press.
  • Hacking, I. (1999). The social construction of what? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Hacking, I. (2004). Historical ontology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Halpern, O. (2014). Beautiful data: A history of vision and reason since 1945. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Hansen, H. K., & Vestergaard, A. (2018). On the contest of lists and their governing capacities: How ‘tax havens’ became ‘secrecy jurisdictions’. In S. Lindblad, D. Pettersson, & T. Popkewitz (Eds.), Education by the numbers and the making of society: The expertise of international assessments (pp. 35–52). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Hayles, K. (1999). How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Kaplan, D. (2016). The methodology of PISA: Past, present and future. In S. Kuger, E. Klieme, N. June, & D. Kaplan (Eds.), Assessing contexts of learning: An international perspective (pp. 53–74). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
  • Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Lindblad, S. (2021). Reflections on researching the Education Agora (Unpublished Paper). Gothenburg University, Gothenburg.
  • Lindblad, S., Pettersson, D., & Popkewitz, T. (2018). Education by the numbers and the making of society: The expertise of international assessments. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Lopez, L. L. (2018). The making of indigeneity, curriculum history, and the limits of diversity. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Madeira, A. I. (2005). Portuguese, French, and British discourses on colonial education: Church-state relations, school expansion, and missionary competition in Africa, 1890–1930. Paedagogica Historica, 41(1–2), 31–60.
  • Martins, C. S. (2013). Genius as a historical event: Its making as a statistical object and instrument for governing schooling. In T. Popkewitz (Ed.), The ‘reason’ of schooling: Historicizing curriculum studies, pedagogy, and teacher education (pp. 99–114). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Mignolo, W. (2013). On comparison: Who is comparing what and why? In R. Felski, & S. S. Friedman (Eds.), Comparison: Theories, approaches, uses (pp. 99–119). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University.
  • Mølstad, C. E., & Pettersson, D. (2019). New practices of comparison, quantification, and expertise in education: Conducting empirically based research. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Murphy, M. (2017). The economization of life. Durham: Duke University Press.
  • Normand, R., Liu, M., Carvalho, L., & Oliveira, D. (2018). Education policies and the restructuring of the educational profession: Global and comparative perspectives. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
  • Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2001). Re-thinking science: Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
  • Nye, D. E. (1999). American technological sublime. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • OECD. (2015). Improving schools in Sweden: An OECD perspective. Paris: OECD.
  • OECD. (2016a). PISA 2015 results in focus. PISA in Focus, 67(1).
  • OECD. (2016b). PISA 2015 Results (Vol. II): Policies and practices for successful schools. doi:https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264267510-en
  • OECD. (2017). PISA 2015 results (Volume III): Students' Well-Being. Paris: PISA, OECD Publishing. doi:https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264273856-en
  • OECD. (2019a). The future of education and skills 2030: OECD learning compass 2030. A series of concept notes. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/teaching-and-learning/learning/learning-compass-2030/OECD_Learning_Compass_2030_Concept_Note_Series.pdf
  • OECD. (2019b). PISA 2018 Assessment and analytical framework. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/b25efab8-en.
  • OECD. (2019c). PISA 2018 results (Vol. III): What school life means for students’ lives. Paris: PISA, OECD Publishing.
  • Pont, B., & Donaldson, G. (2014). The OECD-Sweden education policy review. Main issues and next steps. Stockholm: OECD.
  • Popkewitz, T. (1998). The culture of redemption and the administration of freedom in educational research. Review of Educational Research, 68(1), 1–34.
  • Popkewitz, T. S. (2013). The sociology of education as the history of the present: Fabrication, difference, and abjection. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 34(3), 439–456.
  • Popkewitz, T. S. (2020). The impracticality of practical research: A history of contemporary sciences of change that conserve. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Popkewitz, T., & Huang, J. (in press). Rethinking critical theory and the study of education: Contributions of the ‘posts/new materialism’. In R. Tierney, F. Rizvi, K. Ercikan, & G. Smith (Eds.), Elsevier international encyclopedia of education fourth volume. Amsterdam, Nl: Elsevier.
  • Popkewitz, T., Pettersson, D., & Hsiao, K.-J. (2021). The post-World War Two international educational sciences: Quantification, visualization, and making kinds of people. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Porter, T. (1995). Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Rizvi, F. (2000). International education and the production of global imagination. In N. Burbules, & C. Torres (Eds.), Globalization and education: Critical perspectives (pp. 205–226). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Rouvroy, A. (2013). The end(s) of critique: Data-behaviourism vs due-process. In M. Hildebrandt, & E. D. Vries (Eds.), Privacy, due process, and the computational turn: Philosophers of law meet philosophers of technology (pp. 143–168). London: Routledge.
  • Savage, M. (2010). Identities and social change in Britain since 1940: The politics of method. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Schleicher, A. (2019). PISA 2018: Insights and interpretations. Paris: OECD.
  • Sellar, S., & Lingard, B. (2014). The OECD and the expansion of PISA: New global modes of governance in education. British Educational Research Journal, 40(6), 917–936. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3120
  • Simon, H. (1969). The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Steiner-Khamsi, G., & Quist, H. (2000). The politics of educational borrowing: Reopening the case of Achimota in British Ghana. Comparative Education Review, 44(3), 272–299.
  • Steinmetz, W. (2019). The force of comparison: A new perspective on modern European history and the contemporary world (1st ed.). New York, NY: Berghahn Books.
  • Weinberger, S. (2017). The imagineers of war: The untold story of DARPA, the pentagon agency that changed the world. New York, NY: Vintage.
  • Wikipedia. (2021). Gaussian function. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaussian_function
  • Wynter, S. (2003). Unsetting the coloniality of being/power/truth/freedom: Towards the human, after man, its overrepresentation – An argument. The New Centennial Review, 3(3), 257–373.
  • Ydesen, C. (2019). The OECD's historical rise in education. The formation of a global governing complex. London: PalgraveMacMillan.
  • Yolcu, A., & Popkewitz, T. (2019). Making the able body: School mathematics as a cultural practice. ZDM Mathematics Education, 51(2), 251–261.
  • Zhao, W. (2021). Historicizing translation as (de)colonial practices: China’s 1867 debate on learning Western sciences as an example. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2021.2010012
  • Zheng, L. (2019). A performative history of STEM crisis discourse: The co-constitution of crisis sensibility and systems analysis around 1970. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 42(3), 1–16. doi:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2019.1637332

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.