References
- Ahmad, A. L. (1984). Occidentosis: A plague from the west. Iran: Mizan Press.
- Amin, S. (2008). The world we wish to see. Revolutionary objectives in the twenty-first century. New York: Monthly Review Press.
- Amorim, A. C. (2007). Escritas curriculo, Representacao e Diferenças [Curriculum Writings, Representation and Differences]. Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Educação. Grupo de Trabalho Curriculo. Trabalho Encomendado. Caxambu: Brasil.
- Andreotti, V. (2013). Renegotiating epistemic privilege and enchantments with modernity: The gain in the loss of the entitlement to control and define everything. In Social policy, education and curriculum research Unit (pp. b–s.). North Dartmouth: Centre for Policy Analyses/University of Massachusetts Dartmouth.
- Anzaldua, G. (2007). Borderlands. La frontera. The New Mestiza. San Francisco, CA: Aunt Lute Books.
- Appelbaum, P. (2016a). Endorsement. In J. M. Paraskeva (Ed.), Curriculum. Whose internationalization? New York: Peter Lang.
- Appelbaum, P. (2016b). Blurb. In J. M. Paraskeva (Ed.), Curriculum: Whose internationalization. New York: Peter Lang.
- Apple, M. (1979). Ideology and curriculum. New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
- Apple, M., & Carlson, D. (1998). Introduction. Critical educational theory in unsettling times. In D. Carlson & M. Apple (Eds.), Power, knowledge, pedagogy. The meaning of democratic education in unsettling times (pp. 1–40). Boulder: Westview Press.
- Apple, M., & Weis, L. (1983). Ideology and the practice of schooling. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
- Aronowitz, S. (1973). False promises. The shaping of American working class consciousness. New York: McGraw Hill.
- Aronowitz, S., & Giroux, H. (1981). Postmodern education. Politics, culture and social criticism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
- Au, W. (2012). Critical curriculum studies. Education, consciousness the politics of knowing. New York: Routledge.
- Au, W., Brown, A., & Calderon, D. (2016). Reclaiming the multicultural roots of US curriculum. New York: Teachers College Press.
- Auge, M. (2003). Não-Lugares: Introdução a uma antropologia da supermodernidade [Non-spaces: Introduction to an anthropology of supermodernity]. Campinas: Papirus Editora.
- Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Autio, T. (2006). Subjectivity, curriculum and society. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Autio, T. (2009). Globalization, curriculum and new belongings of subjectivity. In E. Ropo & T. Autio (Eds.), International conversations on curriculum studies (pp. 1–20). Rotterdam: Sense.
- Baker, B. (2007). Animal magnetism and curriculum history. Curriculum Inquiry, 37(2), 123–158.
- Baszile, D. T. (2010). In Ellisonian eyes: What is curriculum theory? In E. Malewski (Ed.), Curriculum studies handbook: The next moment (pp. 483–495). New York, NY: Routledge.
- Baszile, D. T. (2015). Critical race feminist currere. In M. F. He, B. D. Schultz, & W. H. Schubert (Eds.), The SAGE guide to curriculum in education (pp. 119–126). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
- Buhle, P. (1991). Marxism in the United States. New York: Verso.
- Cho, S. (2013). Critical pedagogy and social change. Critical analysis on the language of possibility. New York: Routledge.
- Chou, C. (2017). Chuang Tse. Lisboa: Relogio D’Agua.
- Couto, M. (2008). Terra sonambula [Sleepwalk land]. Lisboa: Leya.
- Dabashi, H. (2015). Can non-Europeans think? London: Zed Books.
- Darder, A. (2012). Culture and power in the classroom. Educational foundations for the schooling of bicultural students. Boulder: Paradigm.
- Darder, A. (2016). Foreword. Ruthlessness and the forging of liberatory epistemologies: An arduous journey. In J. M. Paraskeva (Ed.), Curriculum epistemicides (pp. ix–xvi). New York: Routledge.
- Darder, A. (2021). The generation of utopia. A foreword. In J. M. Paraskeva (Ed.), Curriculum and the generation of utopia (pp. xiii–xxix). New York: Routledge.
- Darder, A., Mayo, P., & Paraskeva, J. (2016). The internationalization of critical pedagogy. An introduction. In A. Darder, P. Mayo, & J. Paraskeva (Eds.), International critical pedagogy reader (pp. 1–14). New York: Routledge.
- Darder, A., & Torres, R. (2004). After race. Racism after multiculturalism. New York: New York University Press.
- Deleuze, G. (1990a). The logic of sense. New York: Columbia University Press.
- Deleuze, G. (1990b). Pourparlers. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit.
- Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
- Dumas, M., & Ross, K. (2006). Be real Black for me: Imagining BlackCrit in education. Urban Education, 51(4), 415–442.
- Eagleton, T. (1994). Ideology and its vicissitudes in Western Marxism. In S. Zizek (Ed.), Mapping ideology (pp. 179–226). London: Verso.
- Eagleton, T. (2003). After theory. New York: Basic Books.
- Eco, U. (1984). Proscript to the name of the rose. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Jovanovich.
- Ellsworth, E. (1989). Why doesn’t this feel empowering? Working through the repressive myths of critical pedagogy. Harvard Educational Review, 59(3), 297–324.
- Freire, P. (1990). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.
- Garza, R., Eufracio, G., & Jupp, J. (2021). Resistant, transnational, and translanguaging traditions of the Rio Grande valley, Aztlán: Advancing the decolonizing imperative in critical pedagogies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 1–21. Advanced online publication.
- Gil, J. (1998). Metamorphoses of the body. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
- Gil, J. (2008). O Imperceptivel Devir da Imanencia [The imperceptible becoming of immanence]. Lisboa: Relogio D’Agua.
- Gil, J. (2009). Em Busca da Idenitidade. O Desnorte [In search of identity. The bewilderment]. Lisboa: Relógio D’Água.
- Gil, J. (2010). O Devir-Eu de Fernando Pessoa [The becoming ‘I’ of Fernando Pessoa]. Lisboa: Relógio.
- Gil, J. (2018). Caos e Ritmo [Chaos and Rhythm.]. Lisboa: Relógio D’Água.
- Giroux, H. (1981). Ideology, culture and the process of schooling. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
- Giroux, H. (1992). Border crossings. New York: Routledge.
- Godoy, A., & Leite, M. C. (in press). Itinerant curriculum theory: Contributions to the study of education in rights in the Brazilian Public defender’s. In J. Paraskeva (Ed.), Itinerant curriculum theory: A declaration of epistemological independence. New York: Bloomsbury.
- Gore, J. (1992). What we can do for you!. In C. Luke & J. Gore (Eds.), Feminisms and critical theory (pp. 54–73). New York: Teachers College Press.
- Gore, J. (1993). The struggle for pedagogies. Critical and feminist discourses as regimes of truth. New York: Routledge.
- Gough, N. (2000). Locating curriculum studies in the global billage. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(2), 329–342.
- Gramsci, A. (1971). Antonio Gramsci: selections from the prison notebooks. Edited by Q. Hoare and G. Smith. New York: International Publishers.
- Grant, A., Brown, K., & Brown, A. (2016). Black intellectual thought in education. The missing traditions of Anna Julia Cooper, Carter G. Woodson and Alain LeRoy Locke. New York: Routledge.
- Greene, M. (1973). Teacher as stranger. Belmont: Wadsworth.
- Grumet, M. (1981). Conception, contradiction and curriculum. JCT, 3(1), 287–298.
- Han, B.-C. (2018). A Expulsao do Outro [The expulsion of the other]. Lisboa: Relogio D’Agua.
- Honneth, A. (2009). Pathologies of reason. New York: Columbia University Press.
- Hooks, B. (2000). Where we stand: Class matters. New York: Routledge.
- Hooks, B. (2015). Feminist theory. From margin to center. New York: Routledge.
- Huebner, D. (1959). From classroom action to educational outcomes. An exploration in educational theory. Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison.
- Huebner, D. (1966). Curricular language and classroom meanings. In J. Macdonald & R. Leeper (Eds.), Language and meaning (pp. 8–26). Washington: ASCD.
- Huebner, D. (1976). The moribund curriculum field: It’s wake and our work. Curriculum Inquiry, 6(2), 153–167.
- Huebner, D. (2021). Preface. Theory not as a schema for ‘acting’, but for ‘looking’. In J. M. Paraskeva (Ed.), Conflicts in curriculum theory (2nd ed., pp. iv–ix). New York: Palgrave.
- Janson, E. (2014). Where the sidewalk ends, the air begins: Colonialism and coloniality in the age of liquid modernity. Paper presented at the Educational Leadership and Policy Studies Doctoral Program, University of Massachusetts, Dartmouth.
- Janson, E. (2020). The Pinocchio effect. Rotterdam: Brill/Sense.
- Janson, E., & Paraskeva, J. (2015). Curriculum counter-strokes and strokes: Swimming in non-existent epistemological rivers. Policy Futures in Education, 13(8), 949–967.
- Jin, H. (2008). The writer as migrant. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
- Jones, H. (2013). Theory, history, context. In S. Malpas & P. Wake (Eds.), The Routledge companion to critical and cultural theory (pp. 3–11). New York: Routledge.
- Jung, J. H. (in press). Leaving the United States in fear and tears: Young Chun Kim’s lonely but brave scholarship as a critical text of decolonizing curriculum studies. In J. Paraskeva (Ed.), Itinerant curriculum theory: A declaration of epistemological independence. New York: Bloomsbury.
- Jupp, J. (2017). Decolonizing and de-canonizing curriculum studies. An engaged discussion organized around João M. Paraskeva’s recent books. Journal for the American Association for the Advancement of Curriculum Studies, 12(1), 1–25.
- Jupp, J. (in press). Decolonial-hispanophone curriculum. In J. Paraskeva (Ed.), Itinerant curriculum theory: A declaration of epistemological independence. New York: Bloomsbury.
- Jupp, J., & Fowler, Y. (in press). Itinerant curriculum theory and the struggle against the epistemicides. New York: Peter Lang.
- Kellner, D. (1989). Critical theory, Marxism and modernity. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.
- Khalfa, J. (1999). Introduction. In J. Khalfa (Ed.), An introduction to the philosophy of Gillen Deleuze (pp. 1–6). London: Continuum.
- Kilpatrick, W. (in press). The project method. In J. M. Paraskeva (Ed.), Curriculum theory. A new comprehensive reader. New York: Peter Lang.
- Kliebard, H. (1995). The struggle for the American curriculum: 1893–1958. New York: Routledge.
- Ladson-Billings, G., & Tate IV, W. (1995). Toward a critical race theory in education. Teachers College Record, 1(Fall), 47–68.
- Lather, P. (1987). The absent present. Patriarchy, capitalism, and the nature of teacher work. Teacher Education Quarterly, 14(2), 25–38.
- Liston, D. (1988). Capitalist schools. Explanation and ethics in radical studies of schooling. New York: Routledge.
- Lopes, A. (2007). Currículo no debate modernidade, pós-modernidade [Curriculum in the debate modernity, postmodernity] Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Educação. Grupo de Trabalho Curriculo. Trabalho Encomendado. Caxambu. Brasil.
- Lorde, A. (2007). Sister outsider. Berkeley: Crossing Press.
- Luke, C. (1992). Feminist politics in radical pedagogy. In C. Luke & J. Gore (Eds.), Feminisms and critical pedagogy (pp. 25–53). New York: Routledge.
- Macedo, E., & Frangella, R. (2007). Currículo e Cultura: deslizamentos e hibridizações [Curriculum and Culture: Slips and hybridizations]. Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Educação. Grupo de Trabalho Curriculo. Trabalho Encomendado. Caxambu: Brasil.
- Malewski, E. (2010). Curriculum studies handbook: The next momentum. New York: Routledge.
- McCarthy, C. (1998). The uses of culture. New York: Routledge.
- McCarthy, C., & Apple, M. (1988). Race, class and gender in American education. Toward a nonsynchronous parallelist position. In L. Weis (Ed.), Class, race and gender in American education (pp. 3–39). Albany: State University of New York Press.
- McLaren, P. (1986). Schooling as a ritual performance. New York: Routledge.
- McLaren, P. (1998). Revolution and reality. An interview with Peter McLaren. In W. Pinar (Ed.), Curriculum. Towards new identities (pp. 355–376). New York: Garland Publishing.
- Merleau-Ponty, M. (1973). The prose of the world. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
- Mestzaros, I. (1998). The uncontrollability of globalizing capital. Monthly Review, 49(9), n/p.
- Mignolo, W. (2012). Local histories/global designs: Coloniality, subaltern knowledges and border thinking. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Miller, J. (1980). Woman: The evolving educational consciousness. JCT, 2(1), 238–247.
- Mitrano, B. (1979). Feminist theology and curriculum theory. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 11(3), 211–220.
- Moon, S. (2016). Tasanhak. Korean neo-confucianism and curriculum studies: Complicating conversation in human nature, knowledge and justuce. In J. M. Paraskeva (Ed.), Curriculum: Whose internatonalization? (pp. 105–128). New York: Peer Lang.
- Moreira, M. A. (2017). And the linguistic minorities suffer what they must? A review of conflicts in curriculum theory through the lenses of language teacher education? Journal for the American Association for the Advancement of Curriculum Studies, 12(1), 1–17.
- Nedjar, M. (in press). Education and the Arab Middle East in IR: Knowledge and the endless (hi)story of coloniality. In J. Paraskeva (Ed.), Itinerant curriculum theory: A declaration of epistemological independence. New York: Bloomsbury.
- O’Brien, M., & Penna, S. (1999). Theorizing welfare. London: Sage.
- Oliveira, I. (2017). Itinerant curriculum theory against the epistemicide. A dialogue between the thinking of Santos and Paraskeva. Journal for the American Association for the Advancement of Curriculum Studies, 12(1), 1–22.
- Oliveira, I. (in press). ICT and curriculum as everyday creation: A doable possibility of the emancipation of curriculum theory. In J. Paraskeva (Ed.), Itinerant curriculum theory: A declaration of epistemological independence. New York: Bloomsbury.
- Paraskeva, J. (2007). Ideologia, Cultura e Curriculo [Ideology, culture and curriculum]. Lisboa: Didatica Editora.
- Paraskeva, J. (2011a). Conflicts in curriculum theory. Challenging hegemonic epistemologies. New York: Palgrave.
- Paraskeva, J. (2011b). Nova Teoria curricular. Lisboa: Edicoes Pedago.
- Paraskeva, J. (2014). Conflicts curriculum theory. Challenging hegemonic epistemologies. New York: Palgrave. (Upgrade paperback edition).
- Paraskeva, J. (2016a). Curriculum epistemicides. New York: Routledge.
- Paraskeva, J. (2016b). The curriculum: Whose internationalization? In J. Paraskeva (Ed.), Curriculum: Whose internationalization (pp. 1–11). New York: Peter Lang.
- Paraskeva, J. (2016c). Opening up curriculum canon to democratize democracy. In J. Paraskeva & S. Steinberg (Eds.), Curriculum: Decanonizing the field (pp. 3–38). New York: Peter Lang.
- Paraskeva, J. (2016d). Brutti, Sporchi and Cattivi. Towards a non-abyssal curriculum. Revista Tempos e Espacos em Educacao, 9(18), 75–90.
- Paraskeva, J. (2018). Towards a just curriculum theory. The epistemicide. New York: Routledge.
- Paraskeva, J. (2021a). Curriculum and the generation of utopia. New York: Routledge.
- Paraskeva, J. (2021b). Conflicts in curriculum theory. Challenging hegemonic epistemologes (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
- Paraskeva, J. (2021c). Did COVID-19 exist before the scientists? Towards curriculum theory now. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 1–12.
- Paraskeva, J. M. (2019a). Itinerant curriculum theory: An epistemological declaration of independence. Qurriculum, 33, 31–47. Universidade de La Laguna.
- Paraskeva, J. M. (2019b). Justica Contra El Epistemicidio. Hacia una Breve Critica de la Razon Occidental Moderna [Justice against epistemicide. Towards a brief critique of modern occidental razon]. Con-Ciencia Social, 3, 157–174.
- Paraskeva, J., & Süssekind, M. (2018). Contra a Cegueira Epistemológica nos Rumos da Teoria Curricular Itinerante [Against epistemological blindness. Towards an itinerant curriculum theory]. Educação e Cultura Contemporânea, 15, 54–85.
- Pedroni, T. (2021). Can post structuralism and neo-Marxist approaches be joined? In J. M. Paraskeva (Ed.), Critical transformative educational leadership (pp. 353–369). Gorham: Meyers Education Press.
- Pepetela. (1992). A Geração da Utopia [The generation of utopia]. Lisboa: Leya.
- Pessoa, F. (2002). The book of disquiet. New York: Penguin.
- Pessoa, F. (2006). Textos Filosóficos, Volume II [Philosophical texts]. Lisboa: Nova Ática.
- Pinar, W. (1974). Autobiography. New York: Peter Lang.
- Pinar, W. (2004). What is curriculum theory? Mawah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
- Pinar, W. (2012). Curriculum states in the United States: Present circumstances, intellectuals histories. New York: Palgrave.
- Pinar, W. (2013). Curriculum studies in the United States: Present circumstances, intellectual histories. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Pinar, W., Reynolds, W., Slattery, P., & Taubman, P. (1995). Understanding curriculum. New York: Peter Lang.
- Popkewitz, T. (1976). Myths of social science in curriculum. The Educational Forum, 40(3), 317–328.
- Popkewitz, T. (2001). A changing terrain of knowledge and power: A social epistemology of educational research. In R. G. McInnis (Ed.), Discourse synthesis. Studies in historical and contemporary social epistemology (pp. 241–266). WestPort: Praeger.
- Price, T. (2016). Las Etapas de la Educacion y la Revolucion. In J. M. Paraskeva (Ed.), Curriculum: Whose internationalization? (pp. 81–104). New York: Peter Lang.
- Price, T. (2017). Welcome to the new Taylorism! Teacher education meets itinerant curriculum theory. Journal for the American Association for the Advancement of Curriculum Studies, 12(1), 1–20.
- Quijano, A. (1992). Colonialidad y Modernidad/Racionalidad [Coloniality, modernity/rationality]. Perú Indígena, 29(1), 11–21.
- Rasco, F. (in press). The itinerant curriculum theory in the Chilean context of curriculum control and standardization: Toward a constituent curriculum. In J. Paraskeva (Ed.), Itinerant curriculum theory: A declaration of epistemological independence. New York: Bloomsbury.
- Recio, R. (in press). A possible utopia for cognitive justice: Deterritorialized critical pedagogy. In J. Paraskeva (Ed.), Itinerant curriculum theory: A declaration of epistemological independence. New York: Bloomsbury.
- Rosario, J., & Demarte, P. (1977). Curriculum theorizing since 1947: Rhetoric or progress? Curriculum Inquiry, 6(4), 249–250.
- Said, E. (2005). Reconsiderando a Teoria itinerante [Reconsidering the itinerant theory]. In M. Sanches (Ed.), Deslocalizar a Europa. Antroplogia, Arte, Literatura e Histó ria na Pós-Colonialidade (pp. 25–42). Lisboa: Cotovia.
- Santos, B. (1995). Towards a new common sense: Law, science and politics in the paradigmatic transition. New York: Routledge.
- Santos, B. (1999). Porque é tão difícil construir uma teoria crítica? [Why it is so difficult to build a critical theory?]. Revista Crítica de Ciencias Sociais, 54, 197–215.
- Santos, B. (2007). Another knowledge is possible. London: Verso.
- Santos, B. (2014). Epistemologies of the south: Justice against epistemicide. Boulder: Paradigm.
- Santos, B. (2015). If God were a human rights activist: Human rights and the challenge of political theologies. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
- Santos, B. (2018). The end of the cognitive empire. Durham: Duke University Press.
- Saramago, J. (2009). Death with interruptions. Orlando: Houghton & Mifflin Harcourt Publishing.
- Schubert, W. (2017). Growing curriculum studies: Contributions of João M. Paraskeva. Journal for the American Association for the Advancement of Curriculum Studies, 12(1), 1–20.
- Schubert, W. (in press). Foreword: Itinerant curriculum theory. In J. Paraskeva (Ed.), Itinerant curriculum theory: A declaration of epistemological independence. New York: Bloomsbury.
- Schubert, W., & Lopez Schubert, A. L. (1980). Curriculum books: The first eighty years. Landham: University Press of America.
- Schwab, J. (1978). The practical: A language for curriculum. In I. Westbury & N. Wilkof (Eds.), Joseph Schwab, science, curriculum and liberal education, selected essays (pp. 287–320). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
- Süssekind, M. L. (2017). Against epistemological fascism. A reading of Paraskeva’s Itinerant curriculum theory. . Journal for the American Association for the Advancement of Curriculum Studies, 12(1), 1–18.
- Süssekind, M. L. (in press). Moving the abyssal lines: Contemporary disputes within Brazilian curriculum field. In J. Paraskeva (Ed.), Itinerant curriculum theory: A declaration of epistemological independence. New York: Bloomsbury.
- Taubman, P. (1982). Gender and curriculum. Discourse and the Politics of Sexuality. JCT, 4(1), 12–87.
- Walkerdine, V. (1992). Progressive pedagogy and political struggle. In C. Luke, & J. Gore (Eds.), Feminisms and critical theory (pp. 15–14). New York: Teachers College Press.
- Wallenstein, S. (1979). Notes toward a feminist curriculum theory. JCT, 1(1), 186–190.
- Walsh, C. (2012). Other’ knowledges, ‘other’ critiques. Reflections on the politics and practices of philosophy and decoloniality in the other America. Transmodernity: Journal of Peripheral Cultural Production of the Luso-Hispanic World, 1(3), 11–27.
- Walsh, C., & Mignolo, W. (2018). Introduction. In C. Walsh & W. Mignolo (Eds.), On decoloniality. Concepts, analytics, praxis (pp. 1–12). Durham: Duke University Press.
- Watkins, W. (1993). Black curriculum orientations. A preliminary inquiry. Harvard Education Review, 63(3), 321–338.
- Watkins, W. (2001). The White architects of Black education. New York: Teachers College Press.
- West, C. (1999). The Cornel West Reader. Boston: Basic Books.
- Wexler, P. (1976). The sociology of education: Beyond inequality. Indianapolis: The Bobbs-Merrill.
- Wexler, P. (1987). Social analysis of culture. After the new sociology. Boston: Routledge & Kegan and Paul.
- Williams, R. (2013). Long revolution. London: Verso.
- Wright, E. (1994). Interrogating inequality. Essays on class analysis, socialism, and marxism. London: Verso.
- Wynter, S. (1989). Beyond the word of man: Glissant and the new discourse of the Antilles. World Literature Today, 63, 637–648.
- Zhao, W. (2019). China’s education, curriculum knowledge and cultural inscriptions. Dancing with the wind. New York: Routledge.
- Zhao, W. (in press). Returning to the cultural foundations of curriculum reform: ICT and Confucian Wind education. In J. Paraskeva (Ed.), Itinerant curriculum theory: A declaration of epistemological independence. New York: Bloomsbury.
- Žižek, S. (2014). Broken eggs. But no omelet. These Times, July 7. Retrieved from https://inthesetimes.com/article/broken-eggs-but-no-omelet.