Automating what? Scholastic products and instructional automation in virtual schooling

References

• Acemoglu, D., & Autor, D. (2010). Skills, tasks and technologies: Implications for employment and earnings. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w16082.
   Google Scholar
• Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2021). Tasks, automation, and the rise in US wage inequality. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Working Paper 28920. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w28920.
   Google Scholar
• Andrejevic, M. (2020). Automated media. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Autor, D. (2014). Polanyi’s paradox and the shape of employment growth (National bureau of economic research working paper no. 20485). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Autor, D. (2015). Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(3), 3–30. doi:10.1257/jep.29.3.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Autor, D., Levy, F., & Murnane, R. (2003). The skill content of recent technological change: An empirical exploration. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4), 1279–1333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aykut, S. C., Morena, E., & Foyer, J. (2021). Incantatory’ governance: Global climate politics’ performative turn and its wider significance for global politics. International Politics, 58(4), 519–540. doi:10.1057/s41311-020-00250-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagrit, L. (1966). The age of automation: The Reith Lectures, 1964. Harmondsworth: Pelican.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, C. (2015). On problematization: Elaborations on a theme in ‘late Foucault’. NonSite.Org. 16I. Retrieved from https://nonsite.org/on-problematization/.
   Google Scholar
• Benanav, A. (2020). Automation and the future of work. London: Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Berkman, D. (1977). Instructional television: The medium whose future has passed. In J. Ackerman, & L. Lipsitz (Eds.), Instructional television: Status and directions (pp. 95–108). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bills, D. (2003). Credentials, signals, and screens: Explaining the relationship between schooling and job assignment. Review of Educational Research, 73(4), 441–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottari, M. (2013, 3 October). Phantom students and failing grades. Truthout. Retrieved from https://truthout.org/articles/cyber-schools-fleece-taxpayers-for-phantom-students-and-failing-grades/
   Google Scholar
• Brass, J., & Lynch, T. (2020). Personalized learning: A history of the present. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 35(2), 3–21.
   Google Scholar
• Busemeyer, M. (2009). Asset specificity, institutional complementarities and the variety of skill regimes in coordinated market economies. Socio-Economic Review, 7(3), 375–406. doi:10.1093/ser/mwp009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey, B. (2016, 21 September). US air force defends F-25A, readies fix for grounded jets. AINOnline. Retrieved from https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/defense/2016-09-21/us-air-force-defends-f-35a-readies-fix-grounded-jets
   Google Scholar
• Cockburn, A. (2021). The spoils of war. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• DeVault, M., & McCoy, L. (2006). Institutional ethnography: Using interviews to investigate ruling relations. In D. Smith (Ed.), Institutional ethnography as practice (pp. 15–44). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Eubanks, V. (2017). Automating inequality. New York: St Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eynon, R., & Young, E. (2021). Methodology, legend, and rhetoric: The constructions of AI by academia, industry, and policy groups for lifelong learning. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 46(1), 166–191. doi:10.1177/0162243920906475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishman, B., & Dede, C. (2016). Teaching and technology: New tools for new times. In D. Gitomer, & C. Bell (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching (5th edn) (pp. 1269–1334). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Harcourt, B. (2022). On critical genealogy: An answer to the question ‘What good is genealogy for praxis?’ Columbia Public Law Research Paper No. 14-706. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=4147668 or doi:10.2139/ssrn.4147668
   Google Scholar
• Horan, H. (2019). Uber’s path of destruction. American Affairs, 3(2), 108–133.
   Google Scholar
• Hornborg, A. (2001). Symbolic technologies: Machines and the Marxian notion of fetishism. Anthropological Theory, 1, 473–496. doi:10.1177/14634990122228854
   Google Scholar
• Hruska, J. (2021, 25 February). The US air force quietly admits the F-35 is a failure. ExtremeTech. Retrieved from https://www.extremetech.com/extreme/320295-the-us-air-force-quietly-admits-the-f-35-is-a-failure.
   Google Scholar
• K-12, Inc. (2020). Form 10-K 2020. US Securities and Exchange Commission. Retrieved from https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1157408/000155837020010355/lrn-2020063010k.htm#Toc.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated cognition. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McKinsey Global Institute. (2017, January). A future that works: Automation, employment, and productivity. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/2oFgdQH.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. (1977). The effects of education as an institution. American Journal of Sociology, 83(1), 55–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molnar, A., Miron, G., Barbour, M. K., Huerta, L., Shafer, S. R., Rice, J. K., … Boninger, F. (2021). Virtual schools in the US, 2021. Boulder, CO: National Education Policy Center. Retrieved from http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/virtual-schools-annual-2021
   Google Scholar
• Molnar, M. (2014). NCAA bans coursework completed by athletes in 24 K12 Inc. Virtual schools. EdWeek Market Brief. Retrieved from: https://marketbrief.edweek.org/marketplace-k-12/ncaa_bans_coursework_completed_by_athletes_in_24_k12_inc_virtual_schools/
   Google Scholar
• Pacewitz, J. (2020). What can you do with a single case? How to think about ethnographic case selection like a historical sociologist. Sociological Methods & Research. doi:10.1177/0049124119901213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedro, F., Subrosa, M., Rivas, A., & Valverde, P. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Challenges and opportunities for sustainable development. Paris: The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Perrotta, C., Gulson, K., Williamson, B., & Witzenberger, K. (2021). Automation, APIs and the distributed labour of platform pedagogies in Google Classroom. Critical Studies in Education, 62(1), 97–113. doi:10.1080/17508487.2020.1855597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrina, S. (2004). Sidney Pressey and the automation of education, 1924–1934. Technology and Culture, 45(2), 305–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pink, S., Ruckenstein, M., Berg, M., & Lupton, D. (2022). Everyday automation: Setting a research agenda. In S. Pink, M. Berg, D. Lupton, & M. Ruckenstein (Eds.), Everyday automation: Experiencing and anticipating emerging technologies (pp. 1–20). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Poster, W., Crain, M., & Cherry, M. (2016). Introduction: Conceptualizing invisible labor. In M. Crain, W. Poster, & M. Cherry (Eds.), Invisible labor (pp. 3–27). Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogoff, B. (1995). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. In J. Wertsch, P. Del Rio, & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 139–164). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, R. (2020). Doordash and Pizza abitrage. Margins, 17 May. Retrieved from: https://themargins.substack.com/p/doordash-and-pizza-arbitrage
   Google Scholar
• Sampson, S. E. (2021). A strategic framework for task automation in professional services. Journal of Service Research, 24(1), 122–140. doi:10.1177/1094670520940407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellar, S., & Gulson, K. N. (2021). Becoming information centric: The emergence of new cognitive infrastructures in education policy. Journal of Education Policy, 36(3), 309–326. doi:10.1080/02680939.2019.1678766
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. (2010). Looking beyond learning: Notes toward the critical study of educational technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 65–73. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00338.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. (2020). The human labour of school data: Exploring the production of digital data in schools. Oxford Review of Education. doi:10.1080/03054985.2020.1835628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. (2022). Less work for teacher? The ironies of automated decision-making in schools. In S. Pink, M. Berg, D. Lupton, & M. Ruckenstein (Eds.), Everyday automation: Experiencing and anticipating emerging technologies (pp. 73–86). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N., Nemorin, S., & Johnson, N. (2016). High-tech, hard work: An investigation of teachers’ work in the digital age. Learning, Media and Technology, 42(4), 395–410. doi:10.1080/17439884.2016.1252770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shestakofsky, B. (2017). Working algorithms: Software automation and the future of work. Work and Occupations, 44(4), 376–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, B. F. (1968). The technology of teaching. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• State Impact. (2012). Student impersonates teacher at Ohio school for more than a year. Retrieved from http://www.ideastream.org/stateimpact/2012/09/07/student-impersonates-teacher-at-ohio-online-school-for-more-than-a-year.
   Google Scholar
• Stop LAPD Spying Coalition. (2021). Automating banishment. Retrieved from https://automatingbanishment.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Wajcman, J. (2017). Automation: Is it really different this time? British Journal of Sociology, 68(1), 119–127. doi:10.1111/1468-4446.12239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, M. (2002). Publics and counterpublics. Brooklyn: Zone Books.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, B. (2016). Digital methodologies of education governance: Pearson plc and the remediation of methods. European Journal of Educational Research, 15(1), 34–53.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, B. (2018). Digitizing education governance: Pearson, real-time data analytics, visualization and machine intelligence. In A. Wilkins, & A. Olmedo (Eds.), Education governance and social theory: Interdisciplinary approaches to research (pp. 21–42). London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, B., & Komljenovic, J. (2022). Investing in imagined digital futures: The techno-financial ‘futuring’ of edtech investors in higher education. Critical Studies in Education. doi:10.1080/17508487.2022.208158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witzenberger, K., & Gulson, K. N. (2021). Why EdTech is always right: Students, data and machines in pre-emptive configurations. Learning, Media, and Technology, 44(4), 420–434. doi:10.1080/17439884.2021.1913181
   Google Scholar
• Zeide, E. (2020). Robot teaching, pedagogy, and policy. In M. D. Dubber, F. Pasquale, & S. Das (Eds.), Oxford handbook of ethics of AI (pp. 789–803). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar