Hollander’s Ricardo

References

• Bharadwaj, K. “The Subversion of Classical Theory: Alfred Marshall’s Farly Writings on Value.” Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1978, 2, 253–71. (a)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj, K. Classical Political Economy and Rise to Dominance of Supply and Demand Theory, New Delhi: Orient Longman, 1978. (b)
   Google Scholar
• Blaug, M. Economic Theory in Retrospect. 2nd ed. Homewood III.: Irwin, 1968.
   Google Scholar
• Cannan, E. A Review of Economic Theory. London, 1929 ( reprinted: Frank Cass, 1964).
   Google Scholar
• Caravale, G., and Tosato, D. Ricardo and the Theory of Value, Distribution and Growth. London: Routledge, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Casarosa, C. “La tcoria ricardiana della distribuzione e dello sviluppo economico.” Rivista di politica economica, 1974, 44, 959–1015.
   Google Scholar
• Casarosa, C. “A New Formulation of the Ricardian System.” Oxford Economic Papers, 1978, 30, 38–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobb, M. Theories of Value and Distribution Since Adam Smith. London: Cambridge University Press, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Farewell, J. “The Interpretation of Ricardo’s Essay on Profits” Economica. 1975, 42, 182–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelberg, V. “The Ricardian Theory of Profits.” Economica, 1933, 13, 51–74.
   Google Scholar
• Garegnani, P. II capitale nelle tcorie dclia distribuzione. Milan: Giuffre, 1960.
   Google Scholar
• Garegnani, P. “Heterogeneous Capital, the Production Function and the Theory of Distribution.” Review of Economic Studies, 1970, 37, 407–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garegnani, P. “La realta dello sfruttamcnto.” Rinascita, 1978, 35(9), 31–32.
   Google Scholar
• Garegnani, P. “Remarks on Hollander’s interpretation of the Essay on Profits of Ricardo” ( mimeo).
   Google Scholar
• Groenewegen, P. “Review of Theories of Value and Distribution since Adam Smith by M. Dobb.” Economic Journal, 1974, 84, 192–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groenewegen, P. “Thomas DcQuinccy: Faithful Disciplc of Ricardo?” ( mimeo).
   Google Scholar
• Harcourt, G. C. Some Cambridge Controversies in the Theory of Capital. London: Cambridge University Press, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, J., and Hollander, S. “Mr. Ricardo and the Moderns.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1977, 91, 351–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks, J., and Hollander, S., “The Ricardian System: A Comment.” Oxford Economic Papers, 1979, 31, 133–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollander, J. “The Development of Ricardo’s Theory of Value.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1904, 75, 455–91.
   Google Scholar
• Hollander, J. David Ricardo—A Centenary Estimate. Baltimore, 1910 ( reprinted: New York: McKelley, 1968).
   Google Scholar
• Hollander, S. “The Development of Ricardo’s Position on Machinery.” History of Political Economy, 1971, 3, 105–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollander, S. The Economics of Adam Smith. London: Heinemann, 1973. (a)
   Google Scholar
• Hollander, S. “Ricardo’s Analysis of the Profit Rate, 1813-15.” Economica, 1973, 40, 260–82. (b)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollander, S. “Ricardo and the Corn Profit Model: Reply to Latwell.” Economica, 1975, 42, 188–202.
   Google Scholar
• Hollander, S. “Ricardo and the Corn Laws: A Revision.” History of Political Economy, 1977, 9, 1–47. (a)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollander, S. “Smith and Ricardo: Aspects of the Nineteenth Century Legacy.” American Economic Review, 1977, 67, 37–41. (b)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollander, S. “The Reception of Ricardian Fcononiics.” Oxford Economic Papers, 1977, 20, 221–57. (c)
   Google Scholar
• Hollander, S. The Economics of David Ricardo. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1979. (a)
   Google Scholar
• Hollander, S. “Review of Sraffa and the Theory of Prices, by A. Roncaglia.” History of Political Economy, 1979, 11, 454–58. (b)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hume, D. “On Interest.” In Political Discourses. 1752 (reprinted in Essays: Moral, Political and Literary, London: Longmans, 1875).
   Google Scholar
• Jevons, W. S. The Theory of Political Economy. 2nd ed. London: Macmillan, 1879.
   Google Scholar
• Kaldor, N. “Alternative Theories of Distribution.” Review of Economic Studies, 1955, 23, 83–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, F. H. On the History and Method of Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1956.
   Google Scholar
• Kregel, J. A. “Ricardo, Trade and Tactor Mobility.” Economia Internazionale, 1977, 30, 215–25.
   Google Scholar
• Malthus, R. Principles of Political Economy (1820). In Ricardo, 1951, vol. II.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, A. Principles of Economics. Vol. I. 9th (variorum) ed., Ed. by C. W. Guillebaud. London: Macmillan, 1961.
   Google Scholar
• Massie, J. An Essay on the Governing Causes of the Natural Rate of Interest, 1750 ( reprint ed. by J. Hollander, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1912).
   Google Scholar
• Mill, J. S. Principles of Political Economy. London, 1848.
   Google Scholar
• Pasinetti, L. “A New Theoretical Approach to the Problems of Economic Growth.” Pontificiae Academiae Scientiarum Scripta Varia. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1965, 571–696.
   Google Scholar
• Pasinetti, L. Growth and Income Distribution—Essays in Economic Theory. London: Cambridge University Press, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Rankin, S. C. “Supply and Demand in Ricardian Price Theory: A Re-interpretation.” Oxford Economic Papers, 1980, 32, 241–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricardo, D. Works and Correspondence, in 11 vols., ed. by P. Sraffa. Cambridge and London: Cambridge University Press, 1951-73.
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, L. An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science, 2nd ed. London: Macmillan, 1935.
   Google Scholar
• Roncaglia, A. Sraffa and the Theory of Prices. London: Wiley, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Samuelson, P. A. “A Modern Treatment of the Ricardian Economy.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1959, 73, 1–35 and 217–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelson, P. A. “The Canonical Classical Model of Political Economy.” Journal of Economic Literature, 1978, 76, 1415–34.
   Google Scholar
• Samuelson, P. A. “Noise and Signal in Debates among Classical Economists: A Reply.” Journal of Economic Literature, 1980, 18, 575–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. History of Economic Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press, 1954.
   Google Scholar
• Shove, G. “The Place of Marshall’s Principles in the Development of Economic Theory.” Economic Journal, 1942, 52, 294–329.
   Google Scholar
• Sraffa, P. “Introduction to Ricardo’s” Principles of Political Economy In Ricardo, 1951, vol. I, pp. xiii–lxii.
   Google Scholar
• Sraffa, P. Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1960.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, G. S. L. “The Origin of Ricardo’s Theory of Profits,” Economica, 1954, 21, 320–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar