The Mumpsimus of Economists and the Role of Time and Uncertainty in the Progress of Economic Knowledge

References

• Alchian, A. “Uncertainty, Evolution and Economic Theory.” In Economic Forces at Work. Ed. by A. Alchian. Liberty Press, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Arouh, A. Towards an Explanation of Persistent Controversy in Economics. Research report, Department of Economics, University of Edinburg, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Asimakopulos, A. “Keynes, Patinkin, Historical Time and Equilibrium.” Canadian Journal of Economics, 1973, 6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumberger, J. “No Kuhnian Revolutions in Economics.” Journal of Economic Issues, 1977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bausor, R. “Time and the Structure of Economic Analysis.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Winter 1982–83, 5 (2), 163–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaug, M. “Kuhn versus Lakatos, or Paradigms versus Research Programmes in the History of Economics.” In Latsis (1976).
   Google Scholar
• Blaug, M. Economic Theory in Retrospect. Cambridge University Press, 1962.
   Google Scholar
• Blaug, M. The Methodology of Economics. Cambridge University Press, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Bloor, D. Wittgenstein: A Social Theory of Knowledge. New York: 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Boland, L. A. “Time in Economics versus Economics in Time: The Hayek Problem.” Canadian Journal of Economics, 1978, 11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronfenbrenner, M. “The Structure of Scientific Revolutions in Economic Thought.” History of Political Economy, 1971, 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, E. K. “The Neoclassical and Post-Keynesian Research Programmes: The Methodological Issues.” Review of Social Economy, 1981, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, C. F., and Ford, J., eds. Uncertainty and Expectations in Economics: Essays in Honour of G. L. S. Shackle. Oxford: 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Chase, R. X. “The Development of Contemporary Mainstream Macroeconomics: Vision, Ideology, and Theory.” In Eichner (1983b).
   Google Scholar
• Chick, V. “A Comment on ‘IS-LM: An Explanation.’” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Spring 1982, 4 (3), 439–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chick, V. “Time and the Wage-Unit in the Method of the General Theory: History and Equilibrium.” In Lawson and Pesaran (1985).
   Google Scholar
• Coats, A. W. “Is There a ‘Structure of Scientific Revolutions’ in Economics?” Kyklos, 1969, 22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coddington, A. Keynesian Economics: The Search for First Principles. London: 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, R. “The Duhem-Quine Thesis.” Economics Journal, 1982, 92.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, P. Money and the Real World. 2nd ed. London: 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, P. “Reviving Keynes’s Revolution.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Summer 1984, 6 (4), 561–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deane, P. The Evolution of Economic Ideas. Cambridge University Press, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Deane, P. “The Scope and Method of Economic Science.” Economic Journal, 1983, 93.
   Google Scholar
• Deane, P. The Concept of a Paradigm and Its Relevance to the History of Economic Thought. Discussion paper, University of Cambridge, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Dobb, M. Theories of Value and Distribution since Adam Smith: Ideology and Economic Theory. Cambridge University Press, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Dow, S. C. “Methodological Morality in the Cambridge Controversies.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Spring 1980, 2 (3), 368–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dow, S. C. Macroeconomic Thought: A Methodological Approach. Oxford, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Earl, P. “A Behavioral Theory of Economists’ Behavior.” In Eichner (1983b).
   Google Scholar
• Eichner, A. “Why Economics Is Not Yet a Science.” Journal of Economic Issues. 1983a, 17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eichner, A., ed. Why Economics Is Not Yet a Science. Armonk, N.Y.: M. E. Sharpe, Inc., 1983b.
   Google Scholar
• Eichner, Alfred S., and Kregel, J. A. “An Essay on Post-Keynesian Theory: A New Paradigm in Economics.” Journal of Economic Literature, 1975, 13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fayerabend, P. K. Against Method. New Left Books, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Fine, B. Economic Theory and Ideology. Oxford: 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, J. L. Choice, Expectation and Uncertainty: An Appraisal of G. L. S. Schackle’s Theory. Oxford: 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, M. “The Methodology of Positive Economics.” In Essays in Positive Economics. Ed. by M. Friedman. Chicago: 1953.
   Google Scholar
• Fulton, G. “Research Programmes in Economics.” History of Political Economy, 1984, 6.
   Google Scholar
• Geras, N. “Marx and the Critique of Political Economy.” In Ideology in Social Science. Ed. by R. Blackburn. Fortune, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Hamouda, O. F. “The Evolution of Hicks’ Theory of Money.” Bulletin of Economic Research, 1985, 37.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harcourt, G. C. Some Cambridge Controversies in the Theory of Capital. Cambridge University Press, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Hamouda, O. F. “Post-Keynesian Economics.” In The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economic Theory and Doctrine. Ed. by J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, and P. Newman. Macmillan, forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, J. F. “On Equilibrium.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Winter 1983–84, 6 (2), 214–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks, J. “Some Questions of Time in Economics.” in Tang, Westfield, and Worley (1976).
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, J. Causality in Economics. New York: 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, J. “IS-LM: An Explanation.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Winter 1980–81, 5 (2), 139–154.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, L. E., and Rouse, R. L. “The Sociology of Knowledge and the History of Economic Thought.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 1977, 36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollander, S. The Economics of Adam Smith. Heineman, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchison, T. W. On Revolutions and Progress in Economic Knowledge. Cambridge University Press, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchison, T. W. “From ‘Dismal Science’ to ‘Positive Economics’—A Century-and-a-Half of Progress.” In Beyond Positive Economics. Ed. by J. Wiseman. London: 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvie, I. C. “Laudan’s Problematic Progress and the Social Sciences.” Philosophy of Social Sciences, 1979, 9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katouzian, M. A. “Scientific Method and Positive Economics.” Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 1974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keynes, J. M. A Treatise on Probability. Macmillan, 1921.
   Google Scholar
• Keynes, J. M. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London: Macmillan, 1936.
   Google Scholar
• Keynes, J. M. “The General Theory of Employment.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1937a.
   Google Scholar
• Keynes, J. M. “Some Economic Consequences of a Declining Population.” Galton Lecture to the Eugenics Society. In The Collected Economic Writings of J. M. Keynes. Vol. 14. Ed. by D. Muggridge. London: Macmillan, 1937b.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, L. R. “Empirical Evidence of Fiscal and Monetary Models.” In Issues in Fiscal and Monetary Policy: The Ecclectic Economist Views the Controversy. Ed. by J. J. Diamond. De Paul University, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Kregel, J. A. “Economic Methodology in the Face of Uncertainty: The Modelling Methods of Keynes and the Post-Keynesians.” Economic Journal, 1976, 86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. The University of Chicago Press, 1962.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. “Second Thoughts on Paradigms.” In The Essential Tension. Ed. by T. S. Kuhn. University of Chicago Press, 1977a.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. “Objectivity, Value Judgement and Theory Choice,” 1977b. In Kuhn (1977a).
   Google Scholar
• Lakatos, I. “Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes.” In Lakatos and Musgrave (1970).
   Google Scholar
• Lakatos, I., and Musgrave, A. Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge University Press, 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Lakatos, I., and Zahar, E. “Why did Copernicus’ Research Program Supersede Ptolemy’s?” In The Copernican Achievements. Ed. by R. S. Westman. Berkeley: 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Latsis, S., ed. Method and Appraisal in Economics. Cambridge University Press, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Laudan, L. Progress and Its Problems: Towards a Theory of Scientific Growth. Berkeley: 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, T. “Keynes, Prediction and Econometrics.” (1985a). In Lawson and Pesaran (1985).
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, T. “Uncertainty and Economic Analysis.” Economic Journal, 1985b, 95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, T., and Pesaran, H. Keynes’ Economics: Methodological Issues. London: 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Leijonhufvud, A. “Schools, ‘Revolutions’ and Research Programmes in Economic Theory.” In Latsis (1976).
   Google Scholar
• Leontief, Wassily. “Foreword.” In Eichner (1983b).
   Google Scholar
• Loasby, B. J. “On Scientific Method.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Spring 1984, 6 (3), 394–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannheim, K. Ideology and Utopia. New York: 1936.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, A. Principles of Economics. 8th ed. New York: 1949.
   Google Scholar
• Meek, R. Economics and Ideology and Other Essays. London: 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Meeks, J. G. T. Keynes on the Rationality of the Investment Decision under Uncertainty. Discussion paper, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Mini, P. V. Philosophy and Economics. Florida: 1974.
   Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, R. M. Keynes as a Theorist of Rationality. Discussion paper, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• O’Driscoll, G.Jr., and Rizzo, M. J. The Economics of Time and Ignorance. Blackwell, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Patinkin, D. “Keynesian Monetary Theory and the Cambridge School.” In Issues in Monetary Economics. Ed. by H. G. Johnson and A. R. Noboy. Oxford University Press, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. Economic Philosophy. London: 1962.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J., ed. After Keynes. Oxford: 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. Economic Heresies. New York: 1973a.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. Collected Economic Papers. Oxford: 1973b.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. “History versus Equilibrium.” In Contributions to Modern Economics. Oxford: 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. Further Contributions to Modern Economics. Oxford: 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Rutherford, M. “Rational Expectations and Keynesian Uncertainty: A Critique.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Spring 1984, 6 (3), 377–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelson, P. “Theory and Realism: A Reply.” American Economic Review, 1964, 54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. History of Economic Analysis. Oxford University Press, 1954.
   Google Scholar
• Shackle, G. L. S. Time in Economics. North-Holland Press, 1958.
   Google Scholar
• Shackle, G. L. S. The Years of High Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1962.
   Google Scholar
• Shackle, G. L. S. “Sir John Hicks’ ‘IS-LM: An Explanation’: A Comment.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Spring 1982, 4 (3), 435–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shackle, G. L. S. “The Romantic Mountain and the Classic Lake: Alan Coddington’s Keynesian Economics.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Winter 1983–84, 6 (2), 241–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanfield, R. “Kuhnian Scientific Revolutions and the Keynesian Revolution.” Journal of Economic Issues, 1974, 8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stigler, G. “The Process and Progress of Economics.” Journal of Political Economy, 1983, 91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, R. “Political Economy, Economics and Beyond.” Economic Journal, 1980, 90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, A. M.; Westfield, F. M.; and Worley, J. S., eds. Evolution, Welfare and Time in Economics. Lexington Books, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Tobin, J. Asset Accumulation and Economic Activity. Oxford: 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Weintraub, E. R. “Uncertainty and the Keynesian Revolution.” History of Political Economy, 1975, 7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisman, D. L. “Tobin on Keynes: A Suggested Interpretation.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Spring 1984, 6 (3), 411–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winch, P. The Idea of a Social Science and Its Relation to Philosophy. London: 1963.
   Google Scholar
• Wiseman, J. D. “The Sociology of Knowledge as a Tool for Research into the History of Economic Thought.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 1980, 39.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wong, S. “The F-Twist and the Methodology of Paul Samuelson.” American Economic Review, 1973, 63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worswick, G. D. N. “Is Progress in Economic Science Possible?” Economic Journal, 1972, 82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, W. L. “Time and Concept Formation in Economics.” Journal of Economics Issues, 1982, 16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar