A nonbehavioral theory of saving

References

• Alvaredo, F., Atkinson, A.B., Piketty, T., and Saez, E. The World Top Incomes Database. (available at http://www.wid.world/; accessed April 2, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Alvarez-Cuadrado, F., and Van Long, N. “The Relative Income Hypothesis.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2011, 35 (9), 1489–1501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baran, P., and Sweezy, P. Monopoly Capital. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1966.
   Google Scholar
• Bertrand, M., and Morse, A. “Trickle-down Consumption.” Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research, Working paper 18883, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Bowles, S., and Park, Y. “Emulation, Inequality, and Work Hours: Was Thorsten Veblen Right?” Economic Journal, 2005, 115 (507), F397–F412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho, L., and Rezai, A. “Personal Income Inequality and Aggregate Demand.” Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2016, 40(2), 491–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charles, K.K., Hurst, E., and Roussanov, N. “Conspicuous Consumption and Race.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2009, 124 (2), 425–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christen, M., and Morgan, R.M. “Keeping Up with the Joneses: Analyzing the Effect of Income Inequality on Consumer Borrowing.” Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 2005, 3 (2), 145–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cynamon, B.Z., and Fazzari, S.M. “Household Income, Demand, and Saving: Deriving Macro Data with Micro Data Concepts.” Review of Income and Wealth. 2015a. doi:10.1111/roiw.12206.
   Google Scholar
• ———. “Inequality, the Great Recession, and Slow Recovery.” Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2015b. doi:10.1093/cje/bev016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly, M.C., Wilson, D.J., and Johnson, N.J. “Relative Status and Well-Being: Evidence from U.S. Suicide Deaths.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 2013, 95 (5), 1480–1500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duesenberry, J. Income, Saving, and the Theory of Consumer Behavior. Harvard Economic Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1949.
   Google Scholar
• Easterlin, R.A. 1974. “Does Economic Growth Improve the Human Lot? Some Empirical Evidence. In P. David and M.W. Reder (eds.), Nations and Households in Economic Growth. New York: Academic Press, pp. 89–125.
   Google Scholar
• ———. “Will Raising the Incomes of All Increase the Happiness of All?” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1995, 27 (1), 35–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. “Income and Happiness: Towards a Unified Theory.” Economic Journal, 2001, 111 (473), 465–484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsby, M.W., Hobijn, B., and Şahin, A. “The Decline of the U.S. Labor Share.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2013, (2), 1–63.
   Google Scholar
• Foley, D.K., and Michl, T. Growth and Distribution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, R.H. “The Demand for Unobservable and Other Nonpositional Goods.” American Economic Review, 1985, 75 (1), 101–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. “The Frame of Reference as a Public Good.” Economic Journal, 1997, 107 (445), 1832–1847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, R.H., Levine, A.S., and Dijk, O. “Expenditure Cascades.” Review of Behavioral Economics, 2014, 1 (1–2), 55–73.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, M. A Theory of the Consumption Function. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1957.
   Google Scholar
• Galbraith, J. Inequality and Instability: A Study of the World Economy Just Before the Great Crisis. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Godley, W. “Seven Unsustainable Processes: Medium-Term Prospects and Policies for the United States and the World.” Technical report, Levy Economics Institute of Bard College, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Guven, C., and Sørensen, B.E. “Subjective Well-Being: Keeping Up with the Perception of the Joneses.” Social Indicators Research, 2012, 109 (3), 439–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, A.H. “Economic Progress and Declining Population Growth.” American Economic Review, 1939, 29 (1), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Heffetz, O. “A Test of Conspicuous Consumption: Visibility and Income Elasticities.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 2011, 93 (4), 1101–1117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaldor, N. “Alternative Theories of Distribution.” Review of Economic Studies, 1955, 23 (2), 83–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. “A Model of Economic Growth.” Economic Journal, 1957, 67 (268), 591–624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krugman, P. (2014). “Four Observations on Secular Stagnation.” In C. Teulings and R. Baldwin (eds.), Secular Stagnation: Facts, Causes and Cures. London: CEPR Press, 2014. A VoxEU.org eBook.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, P., Kooreman, P., Soetevent, A., and Kapteyn, A. “The Effects of Lottery Prizes on Winners and Their Neighbors: Evidence from the Dutch Postcode Lottery.” American Economic Review, 2011, 101 (5), 2226–2247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luttmer, E.F.P. “Neighbors as Negatives: Relative Earnings and Well-Being.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2005, 120 (3), 963–1002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marglin, S.A. Growth, Distribution, and Prices. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. Wage-Labour and Capital, vol. 37. Marxist Library, Works of Marxism-Leninism. New York: International, 1933 [1849].
   Google Scholar
• Mason, J.W., and Jayadev, A. “‘Fisher Dynamics’ in US Household Debt, 1929–2011.” American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2014, 6 (3), 214–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurer, J., and Meier, A. “Smooth It Like the ‘Joneses’? Estimating Peer-Group Effects in Intertemporal Consumption Choice. Economic Journal, 2008, 118 (527), 454–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minsky, H. John Maynard Keynes. New York: Columbia University Press, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• ———. Stabilizing an Unstable Economy., New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Modigliani, F., and Brumberg, R. “Utility Analysis and the Consumption Function: An Interpretation of Cross-ection Data.” In K. Kurihara (ed.), Post Keynesian Economics. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1954, 388–436.
   Google Scholar
• Neumark, D., and Postlewaite, A. “Relative Income Concerns and the Rise in Married Women’s Employment.” Journal of Public Economics, 1998, 70 (1), 157–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palma, J.G. “The Revenge of the Market on the Rentiers: Why Neo-liberal Reports of the End of History Turned Out to Be Premature.” Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2009, 33 (4), 829–869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. “Homogeneous Middles vs. Heterogeneous Tails, and the End of the ‘Inverted-U’: It’s All About the Share of the Rich.” Development and Change, 2011, 42 (1), 87–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadimitriou, D.B., Hannsgen, G., Nikiforos, M., and Zezza, G. “Fiscal Austerity, Dollar Appreciation, and Maldistribution Will Derail the U.S. Economy: Strategic Analysis.” Levy Economics Institute of Bard College, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Pasinetti, L.L. “Rate of Profit and Income Distribution in Relation to the Rate of Economic Growth.” Review of Economic Studies, 1962, 29 (4), 267–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piketty, T., and Saez, E. “Income Inequality in the United States, 1913–1998.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2003, 118 (1), 1–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajan, R.G. Fault Lines: How Hidden Fractures Still Threaten the World Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Ryoo, S. “Inequality of Income and Wealth in the Long Run: A Kaldorian Perspective.” University of Massachusetts Amherst, Department of Economics Working Papers Series 2015–09, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Saez, E., and Zucman, G. “Wealth Inequality in the United States Since 1913: Evidence from Capitalized Income Tax Data.” Working Paper 20625, National Bureau of Economic Research, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Schor, J. The Overspent American: Why We Want What We Don’t Need. Current Affairs. New York: HarperCollins, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. “Neo-classical and Neo-Keynesian Theories of Distribution.” Economic Record, 1963, 39 (85), 53–64.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002 [1759].
   Google Scholar
• Steindl, J. Maturity and Stagnation in American Capitalism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1952.
   Google Scholar
• Summers, L.H. “U.S. Economic Prospects: Secular Stagnation, Hysteresis, and the Zero Lower Bound.” Business Economics, 2014, 49 (2), 65–73.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, L. Reconstructing Macroeconomics: Structuralist Proposals and Critiques of the Mainstream. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, L., and Lysy, F.J. “Vanishing Income Redistributions: Keynesian Clues About Model Surprises in the Short Run.” Journal of Development Economics, 1979, 6 (1), 11–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, L., Rezai, A., Kumar, R., de Carvalho, L., and Barbosa, N. “US Size Distribution and the Macroeconomy, 1986–2009.” Technical report, Schwartz Center for Economic Policy Analysis (SCEPA), New School, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Tcherneva, P.R. “Reorienting Fiscal Policy: A Bottom-up Approach.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 2014, 37 (1), 43–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. “When a Rising Tide Sinks Most Boats: Trends in Income Inequality.” Policy Note 2015/4, Levy Economics Institute of Bard College, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Teulings, C., and Baldwin, R. (eds.) Secular Stagnation: Facts, Causes, and Cures. London: CEPR Press, 2014. A VoxEU.org eBook.
   Google Scholar
• Veblen, T. (1973 [1899]). The Theory of the Leisure Class. With an introduction by J.K. Galbraith. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1973 [1899].
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, E.N. “The Asset Price Meltdown and the Wealth of the Middle Class.” NBER Working Paper no. 18559, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Zizzo, D.J., and Oswald, A.J. “Are People Willing to Pay to Reduce Others’ Incomes?” Annales d’Économie et de Statistique, 2001 (63/64), 39–65.
   Google Scholar