A linear programming model to reduce rank violations while eliciting preference from pairwise comparison matrix

References

• Bana e Costa, C. A., & Vansnick, J. (2008). A critical analysis of the eigenvalue method used to derive priorities in AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 187(3), 1422–1428.10.1016/j.ejor.2006.09.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barzilai, J. (1997). Deriving weights from pairwise comparison matrices. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 48(12), 1226–1232.10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blankmeyer, E. (1987). Approaches to consistency adjustment. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 54, 479–488.10.1007/BF00940197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandran, B., Golden, B., & Wasil, E. (2005). Linear programming models for estimating weights in the analytic hierarchy process. Computers and Operations Research, 32(9), 2235–2254.10.1016/j.cor.2004.02.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, K., Kou, G., & Shang, J. (2014). An analytic decision making framework to evaluate multiple marketing channels. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(8), 1420–1434.10.1016/j.indmarman.2014.06.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, K., Kou, G., Michael, T. J., & Song, Y. (2015). Bridging the gap between missing and inconsistent values in eliciting preference from pairwise comparison matrices. Annals of Operations Research, 235(1), 155–175.10.1007/s10479-015-1997-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, A. T. W., Kalaba, R. E., & Spingarn, K. (1979). A comparison of two methods for determining the weights of belonging to fuzzy sets. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 27, 531–538.10.1007/BF00933438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, G. B., & Williams, C. (1985). A note on the analysis of subjective judgment matrices. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 29(4), 387–405.10.1016/0022-2496(85)90002-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fechner, G. T. (1966). Elements of psychophysics (Vol. 1). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Golany, B., & Kress, M. (1993). A multicriteria evaluation of methods for obtaining weights from ratio-scale matrices. European Journal of Operational Research, 69(2), 210–220.10.1016/0377-2217(93)90165-J
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Pachón, J., & Rodríguez-Galiano, M. I. (2003). Transitive approximation to pairwise comparison matrices by using interval goal programming. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 54(5), 532–538.10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kou, G., Peng, Y., & Wang, G. (2014a). Evaluation of clustering algorithms for financial risk analysis using MCDM methods. Information Sciences, 275, 1–12.10.1016/j.ins.2014.02.137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kou, G., Ergu, D., & Shang, J. (2014b). Enhancing data consistency in decision matrix: Adapting Hadamard model to mitigate judgment contradiction. European Journal of Operational Research, 236(1), 261–271.10.1016/j.ejor.2013.11.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kou, G., & Lin, C. (2014c). A cosine maximization method for the priority vector derivation in AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 235(1), 225–232.10.1016/j.ejor.2013.10.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kou, G., Ergu, D., Lin, C., & Chen, Y. (2016). Pairwise comparison matrix in multiple criteria decision making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 22(5), 738–765.10.3846/20294913.2016.1210694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kułakowski, K. (2015). Notes on order preservation and consistency in AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 245(1), 333–337.10.1016/j.ejor.2015.03.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberatore, M. J., & Nydick, R. L. (2008). The analytic hierarchy process in medical and health care decision making: A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 189(1), 194–207.10.1016/j.ejor.2007.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, C. S., Kou, G., & Ergu, D. (2014). A statistical approach to measure the consistency level of the pairwise comparison matrix. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 65(9), 1380–1386.10.1057/jors.2013.92
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipovetsky, S., & Michael Conklin, W. M. (2002). Robust estimation of priorities in the AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 137(1), 110–122.10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00071-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikhailov, L. (2000). A fuzzy programming method for deriving priorities in the analytic hierarchy process. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 51(3), 341–349.10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardalos, P., Qian, T., & Resende, M. (1998). A greedy randomized adaptive search procedure for the feedback vertex set problem. Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, 2(4), 399–412.10.1023/A:1009736921890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramanathan, R. (1997). Stochastic decision making using multiplicative AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 97(3), 543–549.10.1016/S0377-2217(96)00285-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramanathan, R., & Ramanathan, U. (2010). A qualitative perspective to deriving weights from pairwise comparison matrices. Omega, 38(3–4), 228–232.10.1016/j.omega.2009.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega, 53, 49–57.10.1016/j.omega.2014.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15(3), 234–281.10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (1990). Eigenvector and logarithmic least squares. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), 156–160.10.1016/0377-2217(90)90073-K
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (2000). Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with the analytic hierarchy process. Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Siraj, S., Mikhailov, L., & Keane, J. (2012a). Preference elicitation from inconsistent judgments using multi-objective optimization. European Journal of Operational Research, 220(2), 461–471.10.1016/j.ejor.2012.01.049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siraj, S., Mikhailov, L., & Keane, J. (2012b). A heuristic method to rectify intransitive judgments in pairwise comparison matrices. European Journal of Operational Research, 216(2), 420–428.10.1016/j.ejor.2011.07.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srdjevic, B. (2005). Combining different prioritization methods in the analytic hierarchy process synthesis. Computers and Operations Research, 32(7), 1897–1919.10.1016/j.cor.2003.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srdjevic, B., & Srdjevic, Z. (2011). Bi-criteria evolution strategy in estimating weights from the AHP ratio-scale matrices. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 218(4), 1254–1266.10.1016/j.amc.2011.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steuer, R. E., & Na, P. (2003). Multiple criteria decision making combined with finance: A categorized bibliographic study. European Journal of Operational Research, 150(3), 496–515.10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00774-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thurstone, L. L. (1927). A law of comparative judgment. Psychological Review, 34(4), 273–286.10.1037/h0070288
   Google Scholar
• Van den Honert, R. C. (1998). Stochastic group preference modelling in the multiplicative AHP: A model of group consensus. European Journal of Operational Research, 110(1), 99–111.10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00243-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y. M., Parkan, C., & Luo, Y. (2007). Priority estimation in the AHP through maximization of correlation coefficient. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 31(12), 2711–2718.10.1016/j.apm.2006.10.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wind, Y., & Saaty, T. L. (1980). Marketing applications of the analytic hierarchy process. Management Science, 26(7), 641–658.10.1287/mnsc.26.7.641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar