Efficiency analysis of double perturbed pairwise comparison matrices

References

• Ábele-Nagy, K., & Bozóki, S. (2016). Efficiency analysis of simple perturbed pairwise comparison matrices. Fundamenta Informaticae, 144(3–4), 279–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anholcer, M., & F\"{u}l\"{o}p, J. (2017). Deriving priorites from inconsistent PCM using the network algorithms. Under Review. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/pdf/1510.04315
   Google Scholar
• Bajwa, G., Choo, E. U., & Wedley, W. C. (2008). Effectiveness analysis of deriving priority vectors from reciprocal pairwise comparison matrices. Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research, 25(3), 279–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanquero, R., Carrizosa, E., & Conde, E. (2006). Inferring efficient weights from pairwise comparison matrices. Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, 64(2), 271–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozóki, S. (2014). Inefficient weights from pairwise comparison matrices with arbitrarily small inconsistency. Optimization, 63(12), 1893–1901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozóki, S., Dezső, L., Poesz, A., & Temesi, J. (2013). Analysis of pairwise comparison matrices: An empirical research. Annals of Operations Research, 211(1), 511–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozóki, S., & Fülöp, J. (2018). Efficient weight vectors from pairwise comparison matrices. European Journal of Operational Research, 264(2), 419–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozóki, S., Fülöp, J., & Poesz, A. (2011). On pairwise comparison matrices that can be made consistent by the modification of a few elements. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 19(2), 157–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunelli, M., & Fedrizzi, M. (2014). Axiomatic properties of inconsistency indices for pairwise comparisons. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 66(1), 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choo, E., & Wedley, W. (2004). A common framework for deriving preference values from pairwise comparison matrices. Computers & Operations Research, 31(6), 893–908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conde, E., & P\’{e}rez, M. d. l. P. R. (2010). A linear optimization problem to derive relative weights using an interval judgement matrix. European Journal of Operational Research, 201(2), 537–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, W., & Kress, M. (1988). Deriving weights from pairwise comparison ratio matrices: An axiomatic approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 37(3), 355–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, T. K. (2013). On the extraction of weights from pairwise comparison matrices. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 21(1), 103–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrgott, M. (2000). Multicriteria optimization. Volume 491 of lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Farkas, A. (2007). The analysis of the principal eigenvector of pairwise comparison matrices. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 4(2), 99–115.
   Google Scholar
• Farkas, A., Rózsa, P., & Stubnya, E. (1999). Transitive matrices and their applications. Linear Algebra and its Applications, 302–303, 423–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedrizzi, M. (2013). Obtaining non-dominated weights from preference relations through norm-induced distances. XXXVII Meeting of the Italian Association for Mathematics Applied to Economic and Social Sciences (AMASES). Stresa, Italy: September 5–7
   Google Scholar
• Golany, B., & Kress, M. (1993). A multicriteria evaluation of methods for obtaining weights from ratio-scale matrices. European Journal of Operational Research, 69(2), 210–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harville, D. A. (2008). Matrix algebra from a statistician’s perspective. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Poesz, A. (2009, October). Empirical pairwise comparison matrices (EPCM)--An on-line collection from real decisions, version EPCM. Retrieved from http://www.sztaki.hu/%7ebozoki/epcm
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15(3), 234–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman, J., & Morrison, W. J. (1950). Adjustment of an inverse matrix corresponding to a change in one element of a given matrix. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 21(1), 124–127.
   Google Scholar
• Steuer, R. E. (1986). Multiple criteria optimization: Theory, computation, and application. Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics: Wiley.
   Google Scholar