Kriging-based simulation optimization: An emergency medical system application

References

• Ahuja, S. K., Ferreira, G. M., & Moreira, A. R. (2004). Application of Plackett-Burman design and response surface methodology to achieve exponential growth for aggregated shipworm bacterium. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 85(6), 666–675.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ankenman, B., Nelson, B. L., & Staum, J. (2010). Stochastic Kriging for simulation metamodeling. Operations Research, 58(2), 371–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora, J. S., Huang, M. W., & Hsieh, C. C. (1994). Methods for optimization of nonlinear problems with discrete variables: A review. Structural Optimization, 8(2), 69–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badhurshah, R., & Samad, A. (2015). Multiple surrogate based optimization of a bidirectional impulse turbine for wave energy conversion. Renewable Energy, 74, 749–760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton, R. R. (1992). Metamodels for simulation input--output relations. In Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference (pp. 289–299). Arlington, VA.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, R. R. (1998). Simulation metamodels. In Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference (pp. 167–176). Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, R. R. (2009). Simulation optimization using metamodels. In Proceeding of the Winter Simulation Conference (pp. 230–238).Austin, Tx.
   Google Scholar
• Basudhar, A., Dribusch, C., Lacaze, S., & Missoum, S. (2012). Constrained efficient global optimization with support vector machines. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 46(2), 201–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biles, W. E., Kleijnen, J. P. C., Van Beers, W. C. M., & Van Nieuwenhuyse, I. (2007). Kriging metamodeling in constrained simulation optimization: An explorative study. In Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference (pp. 355–362). Washington, DC
   Google Scholar
• Binois, M., Ginsbourger, D., & Roustant, O. (2015). Quantifying uncertainty on Pareto fronts with Gaussian process conditional simulations. European Journal of Operational Research, 243(2), 386–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Box, G. E. P. (1954). The exploration and exploitation of response surfaces: Some general considerations and examples. Biometrics, 10(1), 16–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Box, G. E. P., & Draper, N. R. (1987). Empirical model-building and response surfaces (Vol. 424). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Box, G. E. P., Hunter, W. G., & Hunter, J. S. (1978). Statistics for experimenters. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, X., Ankenman, B. E., & Nelson, B. L. (2012). The effects of common random numbers on stochastic kriging metamodels. ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation, 22(2), 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiles, J., & Delfiner, P. (2012). Geostatistics: modeling spatial uncertainty. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Cimellaro, G. P., Reinhorn, A. M., & Bruneau, M. (2011). Performance-based metamodel for healthcare facilities. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 40(11), 1197–1217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couckuyt, I., Forrester, A., Gorissen, D., De Turck, F., & Dhaene, T. (2012). Blind Kriging: Implementation and performance analysis. Advances in Engineering Software, 49, 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, D. D., & John, S. (1997). SDO: A statistical method for global optimization. In Multidisciplinary design optimization: State of the art (pp. 315–329).
   Google Scholar
• Dellino, G., Kleijnen, J. P. C., & Meloni, C. (2009). Robust simulation-optimization using metamodels. In Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference (pp. 540–550). Austin, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Deng, H., Shao, W., Ma, Y., & Wei, Z. (2012). Bayesian metamodeling for computer experiments using the Gaussian Kriging models. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 28(4), 455–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrester, A. I., Keane, A. J., & Bressloff, N. W. (2006). Design and analysis of Noisy computer experiments. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Journal, 44(10), 2331–2339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu, M. C. (2002). Optimization for simulation: Theory vs. practice. INFORMS Journal on Computing, 14(3), 192–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gano, S. E., Renaud, J. E., Martin, J. D., & Simpson, T. W. (2006). Update strategies for kriging models used in variable fidelity optimization. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 32(4), 287–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garitselov, O., Mohanty, S. P., & Kougianos, E. (2012). Fast-accurate non-polynomial metamodeling for nano-CMOS PLL design optimization. In International Conference on VLSI Design (VLSID) (pp. 316–321). Hyderabad.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, D., Allen, T. T., Notz, W., & Zeng, N. (2006). Global optimization of stochastic black-box systems via sequential kriging meta-models. Journal of Global Optimization, 34(3), 441–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussain, M. S., Javadi, A. A., Ahangar-Asr, A., & Farmani, R. (2015). A surrogate model for simulation-optimization of aquifer systems subjected to seawater intrusion. Journal of Hydrology, 523, 542–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, R., Du, X., & Chen, W. (2003). The use of metamodeling techniques for optimization under uncertainty. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 25(2), 99–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, D. R., Schonlau, M., & Welch, W. J. (1998). Efficient global optimization of expensive black-box functions. Journal of Global Optimization, 13(4), 455–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, V. R., Hung, Y., & Sudjianto, A. (2008). Blind kriging: A new method for developing metamodels. Journal of Mechanical Design, 130(3), 031102-031102-8. doi:10.1115/1.2829873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khuri, A., & Cornell, J. A. (1996). Response surfaces: Designs and analyses (Vol. 152). New York, NY: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kleijnen, J. P. C. (1987). Statistical tools for simulation practitioners. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kleijnen, J. P. C. (2009). Kriging metamodeling in simulation: A review. European Journal of Operational Research, 192(3), 707–716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleijnen, J. P. C., & Mehdad, E. (2014). Multivariate versus univariate Kriging metamodels for multi-response simulation models. European Journal of Operational Research, 236(2), 573–582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleijnen, J. P. C., Van Beers, W. C. M., & Van Nieuwenhuyse, I. (2012). Expected improvement in efficient global optimization through bootstrapped kriging. Journal of global optimization, 54(1), 59–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, B., & Rao, A. R. (2010). Metamodeling approach to predict friction factor of alluvial channel. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 70(1), 144–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, A. M. (2007). Simulation modeling and analysis (Vol. 4). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Li, R., & Sudjianto, A. (2005). Analysis of computer experiments using penalized likelihood in Gaussian Kriging models. Technometrics, 47(2), 111–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, J., Buongiorno, J., & Monserud, R. A. (2006). Bootstrap simulation and response surface optimization of management regimes for Douglas-fir/western hemlock stands. Forest Science, 52(5), 579–594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luenberger, D. G. (2003). Linear and nonlinear programming (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Matheron, G. (1963). Principles of geostatistics. Economic Geology, 58(8), 1246–1266.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, W. R., & Montgomery, D. C. (2003). Response surface methodology (Vol. 1). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Picheny, V., & Ginsbourger, D. (2014). Noisy kriging-based optimization methods: A unified implementation within the DiceOptim package. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 71, 1035–1053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picheny, V., Ginsbourger, D., Richet, Y., & Caplin, G. (2013). Quantile-based optimization of noisy computer experiments with tunable precision. Technometrics, 55(1), 2–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto, L. R., Silva, P. M. S., & Young, T. P. (2015). A generic method to develop simulation models for ambulance systems. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 51, 170–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roustant, O., Ginsbourger, D., & Deville, Y. (2012). DiceKriging, DiceOptim: Two R packages for the analysis of computer experiments by kriging-based metamodeling and optimization. Journal of Statistical Software, 51(1), 1–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasena, M. J. (2002). Flexibility and efficiency enhancements for constrained global design optimization with kriging approximations (PhD dissertation). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Sasena, M. J., Papalambros, P., & Goovaerts, P. (2002). Exploration of metamodeling sampling criteria for constrained global optimization. Engineering Optimization, 34(3), 263–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, P. M. S., & Pinto, L. R. (2010). Emergency medical systems analysis by simulation and optimization. In Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference. Baltimore, MD.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, T. W., Mauery, T. M., Korte, J. J., & Mistree, F. (2001). Kriging models for global approximation in simulation-based multidisciplinary design optimization. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Journal, 39(12), 2233–2241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staum, J. (2009). Better simulation metamodeling: The why, what, and how of stochastic kriging. In Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference (pp. 119–133). Austin, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Viana, F. A. C., Haftka, R. T., & Watson, L. T. (2010). Why not run the efficient global optimization algorithm with multiple surrogates. Proceedings of the AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference. Orlando, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, G. G., & Shan, S. (2007). Review of metamodeling techniques in support of engineering design optimization. Journal of Mechanical Design, 129(4), 370–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• William, L. G., Gary, D. F., & John, R. (1994). Global optimization of statistical functions with simulated annealing. Journal of Econometrics, 60(1), 65–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong, F., Xiong, Y., Chen, W., & Yang, S. (2009). Optimizing Latin hypercube design for sequential sampling of computer experiments. Engineering Optimization, 41(8), 793–810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, J., Ng, S. H., & Ng, K. M. (2011). Kriging metamodel with modified nugget-effect: The heteroscedastic variance case. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 61(3), 760–777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., Hu, S., Wu, J., Zhang, Y., & Chen, L. (2014). Multi-objective optimization of double suction centrifugal pump using Kriging metamodels. Advances in Global Optimization, 74, 16–26.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, L., Choi, K. K., & Lee, I. (2011). Metamodeling method using dynamic kriging for design optimization. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Journal, 49(9), 2034–2046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhen, L., Wang, K., Hu, H., & Chang, D. (2014). A simulation optimization framework for ambulance deployment and relocation problems. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 72, 12–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar