367
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

An optimization approach for existing home seller-buyer matching

, ORCID Icon, &
Pages 237-254 | Received 29 Sep 2015, Accepted 07 Jan 2018, Published online: 07 Mar 2018

References

  • Akahoshi, T. (2014). A necessary and sufficient condition for stable matching rules to be strategy-proof. Social Choice and Welfare, 43(3), 683–702.10.1007/s00355-014-0803-1
  • Andersson, T., & Svensson, L. G. (2016). Strategy-proof house allocation with price restrictions. Journal of Economic Theory, 163, 167–177.10.1016/j.jet.2016.01.010
  • Bai, R., Li, J., Atkin, J. A., & Kendall, G. (2013). A novel approach to independent taxi scheduling problem based on stable matching. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 65(10), 1501–1510.
  • Bhatnagar, R., & Saddikuti, V. (2010). Models for cellular manufacturing systems design: Matching processing requirements and operator capabilities. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 61(5), 827–839.10.1057/jors.2008.181
  • Bloch, F., & Ryder, H. (2000). Two-sided search, marriage and matchmakers. International Economic Review, 41(1), 93–116.10.1111/iere.2000.41.issue-1
  • Caplin, A., & Leahy, J. (2014). A graph theoretic approach to markets for indivisible goods. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 52(3), 112–122.10.1016/j.jmateco.2014.03.011
  • Carrillo, J. D., & Singhal, S. (2016). Tiered housing allocation with preannounced rankings: An experimental analysis. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 25(1), 133–160.10.1111/jems.12143
  • Chang, M. L., & Cheng, C. F. (2012). How buyer-seller relationship quality influences adaption and innovation by foreign MNCs’ subsidiaries. Industrial Marketing Management, 41(7), 1047–1057.10.1016/j.indmarman.2012.02.005
  • Corry, P., & Kozan, E. (2004). Job scheduling with technical constraints. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 55(2), 160–169.10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601673
  • Diebold, F., & Bichler, M. (2017). Matching with indifferences: A comparison of algorithms in the context of course allocation. European Journal of Operational Research, 260(1), 268–282.10.1016/j.ejor.2016.12.011
  • Farquhar, P. H. (1984). State of the art – Utility assessment methods. Management Science, 30(11), 1283–1300.10.1287/mnsc.30.11.1283
  • Fırat, M., Briskorn, D., & Laugier, A. (2016). A Branch-and-Price algorithm for stable workforce assignments with hierarchical skills. European Journal of Operational Research, 251(2), 676–685.10.1016/j.ejor.2015.11.039
  • Gale, D., & Shapley, L. S. (1962). College admissions and the stability of marriage. American Mathematical Monthly, 69(1), 9–15.10.2307/2312726
  • Güneş, E. D., Yaman, H., Çekyay, B., & Verter, V. (2012). Matching patient and physician preferences in designing a primary care facility network. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 65(4), 483–496.
  • Hamed, K., Ashkan, R. K., & Majd, V. J. (2011). An agent-based system for bilateral contracts of energy. Expert System with Applications, 38(9), 11369–11376.
  • Han, L., & Strange, W. C. (2014). The microstructure of housing markets: Search, bargaining, and brokerage. Handbook of Regional And Urban Economics, 5, 1–84.
  • Hung, Y. C., & Tseng, P. T. Y. (2012). The benefit of knowledge sharing: A case study of a real estate brokerage service. Case Studies in Service Innovation, 5, 121–123.10.1007/978-1-4614-1972-3
  • Jiang, Z. Z., Ip, W. H., Lau, H. C. W., & Fan, Z. P. (2011). Multi-objective optimization matching for one-shot multi-attribute exchanges with quantity discounts in E-brokerage. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(4), 4169–4180.10.1016/j.eswa.2010.09.079
  • Jiang, Z. Z., Zhang, R., Fan, Z. P., & Chen, X. H. (2015). A fuzzy matching model with Hurwicz criteria for one-shot multi-attribute exchanges in E-brokerage. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 14(1), 77–96.10.1007/s10700-014-9189-x
  • Jung, J. J., & Jo, G. S. (2000). Brokerage between buyer and seller agents using Constraint Satisfaction Problem models. Decision Support Systems, 28(4), 293–304.10.1016/S0167-9236(99)00093-7
  • Kameshwaran, S., Narahari, Y., Rosa, C. H., Kulkarni, D. M., & Tew, J. D. (2007). Multiattribute electronic procurement using goal programming. European Journal of Operational Research, 179(2), 518–536.10.1016/j.ejor.2006.01.010
  • Klaus, B., & Klijn, F. (2010). Smith and Rawls share a room: Stability and medians. Social Choice and Welfare, 35(4), 647–667.10.1007/s00355-010-0455-8
  • Klumpp, T. (2009). Two-sided matching with spatially differentiated agents. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 45(5), 376–390.10.1016/j.jmateco.2009.03.002
  • Korkmaz, I., Gökçen, H., & Çetinyokuş, T. (2008). An analytic hierarchy process and two-sided matching based decision support system for military personnel assignment. Information Sciences, 178(14), 2915–2927.10.1016/j.ins.2008.03.005
  • Kuhn, H. W. (1955). The Hungarian method for the assignment problem. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 2(1–2), 83–97.10.1002/(ISSN)1931-9193
  • Malin, H. (1986). Can individual preference orderings ever be intransitive? Omega, 14(2), 188–189.10.1016/0305-0483(86)90021-6
  • Mangasarian, O. L. (2009). A generalized Newton method for absolute value equations. Optimization Letters, 3(1), 101–108.10.1007/s11590-008-0094-5
  • McIvor, R., & Humphreys, P. (2004). The implications of electronic B2B intermediaries for the buyer-supplier interface. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 24(3), 241–269.10.1108/01443570410519024
  • Merlo, A., Ortalo-Magné, F., & Rust, J. (2015). The home selling problem: Theory and evidence. International Economic Review, 56(2), 457–484.10.1111/iere.12111
  • Roth, A. E. (1985). Common and conflicting interests in two-sided matching markets. European Economic Review, 27(1), 75–96.10.1016/0014-2921(85)90007-8
  • Roth, A. E., & Vate, J. H. V. (1990). Random paths to stability in two-sided matching. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 5, 1475–1480.10.2307/2938326
  • Rutherford, R., & Yavas, A. (2012). Discount brokerage in residential real estate markets. Real Estate Economics, 40(3), 508–535.10.1111/reec.2012.40.issue-3
  • Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), 9–26.10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I
  • Shapley, L. S., & Shubik, M. (1971). The assignment game I: The core. International Journal of Game Theory, 1(1), 111–130.10.1007/BF01753437
  • Soriano, J. M. (1996). On the existence of zero points. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 79(1), 99–104.10.1016/0096-3003(95)00246-4
  • Steuer, R. E. (1986). Multiple criteria optimization: Theory, computation, and application. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
  • van Raalte, C., & Webers, H. (1998). Spatial competition with intermediated matching. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 34(3), 477–488.10.1016/S0167-2681(97)00080-2
  • Wark, P., & Holt, J. (1994). A repeated matching heuristic for the vehicle routeing problem. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 45(10), 1156–1167.10.1057/jors.1994.185
  • Yuan, X., Lee, J. H., Kim, S. J., & Kim, Y. H. (2013). Toward a user-oriented recommendation system for real estate websites. Information Systems, 38(2), 231–243.10.1016/j.is.2012.08.004
  • Zeng, X. H., Dasgupta, S., & Weinberg, C. B. (2012). How good are you at getting a lower price? A field study of the US automobile market. Journal of Consumer Policy, 35(2), 255–274.10.1007/s10603-012-9192-y
  • Zhang, Z. H., & Wang, D. W. (2006). Research on trading model of electronic broker in second-hand apartment market. Journal of System Simulation, 18(2), 492–495, 499.
  • Zhao, D., Zhang, D., Khan, M., & Perrussel, L. (2010). Maximal matching for double auction. Advances in Artificial Intelligence, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6464, 516–525.
  • Zhu, J., & Zhang, D. (2011). Dynamic auction for efficient competitive equilibrium under price rigidities. Advances in Artificial Intelligence, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 7106, 809–818.
  • Zimmermann, H. J. (1978). Fuzzy programming and linear programming with several objective functions. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1(1), 45–55.10.1016/0165-0114(78)90031-3

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.