Performance evaluation and quota allocation for multiple undesirable outputs based on the uniform frontier

References

• Andersen, P., & Petersen, N. C. (1993). A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 39(10), 1261–1264.10.1287/mnsc.39.10.1261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078–1092.10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgärtner, S., Dyckhoff, H., Faber, M., Proops, J., & Schiller, J. (2001). The concept of joint production and ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 36(3), 365–372.10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00260-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bi, G., Feng, C., Ding, J., Liang, L., & Chu, F. (2014). The linear formulation of the ZSG-DEA models with different production technologies. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 65(8), 1202–1211.10.1057/jors.2013.69
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Central Compilation and Translation Bureau. (2011). The 12th five-year plan for national economic and social development of the People’s Republic of China. Beijing: Central Compilation and Translation Press.
   Google Scholar
• Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Huang, Z., & Sun, D. (1990). Polyhedral cone-ratio DEA models with an illustrative application to large commercial banks. Journal of Econometrics, 46(1–2), 73–91.10.1016/0304-4076(90)90048-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444.10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y. (2005). Measuring super-efficiency in DEA in the presence of infeasibility. European Journal of Operational Research, 161(2), 545–551.10.1016/j.ejor.2003.08.060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, Y., Lin, J., Su, W., & Liu, J. (2015). An efficiency evaluation of the EU’s allocation of carbon emission allowances. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 10(2), 192–200.10.1080/15567249.2010.527900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, W. D., Liang, L., Zha, Y., & Zhu, J. (2009). A modified super-efficiency DEA model for infeasibility. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 60(2), 276–281.10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, W. D., & Seiford, L. M. (2009). Data envelopment analysis (DEA)-thirty years on. European Journal of Operational Research, 192(1), 1–17.10.1016/j.ejor.2008.01.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, C., Chu, F., Ding, J., Bi, G., & Liang, L. (2015). Carbon Emissions Abatement (CEA) allocation and compensation schemes based on DEA. Omega, 53(6), 78–89.10.1016/j.omega.2014.12.005
   Google Scholar
• Gomes, E. G., & Lins, M. P. E. (2008). Modelling undesirable outputs with zero sum gains data envelopment analysis models. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 23(2), 163–178.
   Google Scholar
• Honma, S., & Hu, J. (2009). Efficient waste and pollution abatements for regions in Japan. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 16(4), 270–285.10.1080/13504500902919771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, J., & Lee, Y. (2008). Efficient three industrial waste abatement for regions in China. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 15(2), 132–144.10.1080/13504500809469778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lins, M. P. E., Gomes, E. G., Soares de Mello, J. C. C. B., & Soares de Mello, A. J. R. (2003). Olympic ranking based on a zero sum gains DEA model. European Journal of Operational Research, 148(2), 312–322.10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00687-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovell, C. A. K., & Rouse, A. P. B. (2003). Equivalent standard DEA models to provide super-efficiency scores. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 54(1), 101–108.10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lozano, S., Villa, G., & Brännlund, R. (2009). Centralised reallocation of emission permits using DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 193(3), 752–760.10.1016/j.ejor.2007.07.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miao, Z., Geng, Y., & Sheng, J. (2016). Efficient allocation of CO2 emissions in China: A zero sum gains data envelopment model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112(5), 4144–4150.10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.035
   Google Scholar
• National Development and Reform Commission of PRC, Ministry of Finance of PRC, Ministry of Environmental Protection of PRC, & State Economy and Trade Commission of PRC. (2003, February). Administrative regulations on levy and use of pollutant discharge fee.
   Google Scholar
• Reinhard, S., Lovell, C. A. K., & Thijssen, G. (1999). Econometric estimation of technical and environmental efficiency: An application to Dutch dairy farms. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 81(1), 44–60.10.2307/1244449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seiford, L. M., & Zhu, J. (1999). Infeasibility of super-efficiency data envelopment analysis models. INFOR-Information Systems & Operational Research, 37(2), 174–187.10.1080/03155986.1999.11732379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seiford, L. M., & Zhu, J. (2002). Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research, 142(1), 16–20.10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00293-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, J., Wu, J., Liang, L., Zhong, R., & Huang, G. (2014). Allocation of emission permits using DEA: Centralised and individual points of view. International Journal of Production Research, 52(2), 419–435.10.1080/00207543.2013.829592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, K., Zhang, X., Wei, Y., & Yu, S. (2013). Regional allocation of CO2 emissions allowance over provinces in China by 2020. Energy Policy, 54(3), 214–229.10.1016/j.enpol.2012.11.030
   Google Scholar
• Wu, J., An, Q., Yao, X., & Wang, B. (2014). Environmental efficiency evaluation of industry in China based on a new fixed sum undesirable output data envelopment analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 74(7), 96–104.10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.03.054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, X., Tan, L., Guo, J., Wang, Y., Liu, H., & Zhu, W. (2016). A study of allocative efficiency of PM2.5, emission rights based on a zero sum gains data envelopment model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 113, 1024–1031.10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, F., Wu, D. D., Liang, L., & O’Neill, L. (2011). Competition strategy and efficiency evaluation for decision making units with fixed-sum outputs. European Journal of Operational Research, 212(3), 560–569.10.1016/j.ejor.2011.02.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, M., Li, Y., Chen, Y., & Liang, L. (2014). An equilibrium efficiency frontier data envelopment analysis approach for evaluating decision-making units with fixed-sum outputs. European Journal of Operational Research, 239(2), 479–489.10.1016/j.ejor.2014.05.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, M., Li, Y., & Liang, L. (2015). A generalized equilibrium efficient frontier data envelopment analysis approach for evaluating DMUs with fixed-sum outputs. European Journal of Operational Research, 246(1), 209–217.10.1016/j.ejor.2015.04.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, J., Luo, H., Xue, J., & Lu, C. (2010). Research on total load allocation of the industrial waste water in key cities. Environmental Protection Science, 36(2), 8–10.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, P., Ang, B., & Han, J. (2010). Total factor carbon emission performance: A Malmquist index analysis. Energy Economics, 32(1), 194–201.10.1016/j.eneco.2009.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, J. (1996). Robustness of the efficient DMUs in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 90(3), 451–460.10.1016/0377-2217(95)00054-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zofı́o, J. L., & Prieto, A. M. (2001). Environmental efficiency and regulatory standards: The case of CO2 emissions form OECD industries. Resource and Energy Economics, 23(1), 63–83.10.1016/S0928-7655(00)00030-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar