A moment-free nonparametric quantity-of-quality approach to optimal portfolio selection: A role for endogenous shortfall and windfall boundaries?

References

• Adcock, C. (2010). Asset pricing and portfolio selection based on the multivariate extended skew-Student-t distribution. Annals of Operations Research, 176, 221–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballestero, E., & Romero, C. (1996). Portfolio selection: A compromise programming solution. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 47, 1377–1386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bawa, V. (1976). Admissible portfolios for all individuals. Journal of Finance, 31, 1169–1183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bawa, V. (1978). Safety-first, stochastic dominance, and optimal portfolio choice. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 13, 255–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blundell, R., & Duncan, A. (1998). Kernel regression in empirical microeconomics. Journal of Human Resources, 33, 62–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornmann, L., Mutz, R., Hug, S., & Daniel, H.-D. (2011). A multilevel meta-analysis of studies reporting correlations between the h index and 37 different h index variants. Journal of Informetrics, 5, 346–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronin, B., & Meho, L. (2006). Using the h-index to rank influential information scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57, 1275–1278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumova, D., & Nawrocki, D. (2014). Portfolio optimization in an upside potential and downside risk framework. Journal of Economics and Business, 71, 68–89.
   Google Scholar
• DeMiguel, V., Garlappi, L., & Uppal, R. (2009). Optimal versus naive diversification: How inefficient is the 1/N portfolio strategy?. Review of Financial Studies, 22, 1915–1953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diem, A., & Wolter, S. (2013). The use of bibliometrics to measure research performance in education sciences. Research in Higher Education, 54, 86–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egghe, L. (2006). Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69, 129–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakansson, N., & Ziemba, W. (1995). Capital growth theory. In R. A. Jarrow, V. Maksimovic, & W. T. Ziemba (Eds.), Handbooks in operations research and management science, 9: Finance. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Haley, M. (2008). A simple nonparametric approach to low-dimension, shortfall-based portfolio selection. Finance Research Letters, 5, 183–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haley, M. (2012). Generalized safety first and the planting of crops. Applied Economics Letters, 19, 511–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haley, M. (2013). Rank variability of the Publish or Perish metrics for economics and finance journals. Applied Economics Letters, 20, 830–836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haley, M. (2014a). Ranking top economics and finance journals using microsoft academic search versus google scholar: How does the new publish or perish option compare?. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65, 1079–1084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haley, M. (2014b). Gaussian and logistic adaptations of smoothed safety first. Annals of Finance, 10, 333–345.
   Google Scholar
• Haley, M. (2016a). Shortfall minimization and the naive (1/N) portfolio: An out-of-sample comparison. Applied Economics Letters, 23, 926–929.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haley, M. (2016b). A ranking of journals for the aspiring health economist. Applied Economics, 48, 1710–1718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haley, M. (2017a). K-Fold cross validation performance comparisons of six naive portfolio selection rules: How naive can you be and still have successful out-of-sample portfolio performance?. Annals of Finance, 13, 341–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haley, M. (2017b). On the normalization and distributional adjustment of journal ranking metrics: A simple parametric approach. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68, 1590–1593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haley, M. (2017c). On the inauspicious incentives of scholar-level h-index: an economist’s take on collusive and coercive citation. Applied Economics Letters, 24, 85–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haley, M. (2018). A nonparametric quantity-of-quality approach to assessing financial asset return performance. Annals of Finance, doi: 10.1007/s10436-018-0319-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haley, M., & McGee, M. (2006). Tilting safety first and the sharpe portfolio. Finance Research Letters, 3, 173–180.
   Google Scholar
• Haley, M., & McGee, M. (2011). KLICing there and back again: Portfolio selection using the empirical likelihood divergence and the Hellinger distance. Journal of Empirical Finance, 18, 341–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haley, M., & McGee, M. (2018). A parametric parent metric: Approach for comparing maximum-normalized journal ranking metrics. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 69, 172–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haley, M., McGee, M., & Walker, T. (2012). Disparity, shortfall, and twice-endogenous HARA utility. Econometric Reviews, 32, 524–541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haley, M., Paarsch, H., & Whiteman, C. (2013). Smoothed safety first and the holding of assets. Quantitative Finance, 13, 167–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haley, M., & Walker, T. (2010). Alternative tilts for nonparametric option pricing. Journal of Futures Markets, 30, 983–1006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haley, M., & Whiteman, C. (2008). Generalized safety first and a new twist on portfolio performance. Econometric Reviews, 27, 457–485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanoch, G., & Levy, H. (1970). Efficient portfolio selection with quadratic and cubic utility. The Journal of Business, 43, 181–189.
   Google Scholar
• Henzinger, M., Suñol, J., & Weber, I. (2009). The stability of the h-index. Scientometrics, 84, 465–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch, J. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 16569–16572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konno, H., Shirakawa, H., & Yamazaki, H. (1993). A mean-absolute deviation-skewness portfolio optimization model. Annals of Operations Research, 45, 205–220.
   Google Scholar
• Kraus, A., & Litzenberger, R. (1976). Skewness preference and the valuation of risk assets. Journal of Finance, 31, 1085–1100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, M. (2009). Evaluating scientists: Citations, impact factor, h-Index, online page its and what else?. IETE Technical Review, 26, 165–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leland, H. (1999). Performance measurement in a nonsymmetrical world. Financial Analysts Journal, 55, 27–35.
   Google Scholar
• Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio selection. Journal of Finance, 7, 77–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markowitz, H. (1970). Portfolio selection: Efficient diversification of investments (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, B. (2013). Whither research integrity? Plagiarism, self-plagiarism and coercive citation in an age of research assessment. Research Policy, 42, 1005–1014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martel, J.-M., Khoury, M., & Bergeron, M. (1988). An application of multicriteria to portfolio comparisons. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 39, 617–628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mingers, J., Macri, F., & Petrovici, D. (2012). Using the h-index to measure the quality of journals in the field of business and management. Information Processing and Management, 48, 234–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mossin, J. (1968). Optimal multiperiod portfolio policies. The Journal of Business, 41, 215–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oppenheim, C. (2007). Using the h-index to rank influential British researchers in information science and librarianship. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58, 297–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyle, D., & Turnovsky, S. (1970). Safety-first and expected utility maximization in mean-standard deviation portfolio analysis. Review of Economics and Statistics, 52, 75–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabin, M. (1998). Psychology and economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 36, 11–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, A. (1952). Safety first and the holding of assets. Econometrica, 20, 431–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelson, P. (1970). The fundamental approximation theorem of portfolio analysis in terms of means, variances and higher moments. The Review of Economic Studies, 37, 537–542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharpe, M. (1994). The Sharpe ratio. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 21, 49–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sortino, F., & Price, L. (1994). Performance measurement in a downside risk framework. The Journal of Investing, 3, 59–64.
   Google Scholar
• Stutzer, M. (2000). A portfolio performance index. Financial Analysts Journal, 56, 52–61.
   Google Scholar
• Stutzer, M. (2003). Portfolio choice with endogenous utility: A large deviations approach. Journal of Econometrics, 116, 365–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wildgaard, L. (2015). A comparison of 17 author-level bibliometric indicators for researchers in Astronomy, Environmental Science, Philosophy and Public Health in Web of Science and Google Scholar. Scientometrics, 104, 873–906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilhite, A., & Fong, E. (2012). Coercive citation in academic publishing. Science, 335, 542–543. doi: 10.1126/science.1212540
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, C. (2009). The e-index, complementing the h-index for excess citations. PLoS One, 4, e5429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar