315
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Multi-objective optimisation of risk and business strategy in real-world supply networks in the presence of uncertainty

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1869-1884 | Received 18 Jan 2017, Accepted 12 Jul 2018, Published online: 24 Jan 2019

References

  • Amorim, P., Curcio, E., Almada-Lobo, B., Barbosa-Póvoa, A. P. F. D., & Grossmann, I. E. (2016). Supplier selection in the processed food industry under uncertainty. European Journal of Operational Research, 252(3), 801–814.
  • Araz, C., & Ozkarahan, I. (2007). Supplier evaluation and management system for strategic sourcing based on a new multicriteria sorting procedure. International Journal of Production Economics, 106(2), 585–606.
  • Bottani, E., & Rizzi, A. (2008). An adapted multi-criteria approach to suppliers and products selection-an application oriented to lead-time reduction. International Journal of Production Economics, 111(2), 763–781.
  • Çebi, F., & Otay, I. (2016). A two-stage fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and order allocation problem with quantity discounts and lead time. Information Sciences, 339, 143–157.
  • Chan, F. T. S., & Kumar, N. (2007). Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach. Omega, 35(4), 417–431.
  • Chen, C., Lin, C., & Huang, S. (2006). A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management. International Journal of Production Economics, 102 (2), 289–301.
  • Choi, T.-M., Wallace, S. W., & Wang, Y. (2016). Risk management and coordination in service supply chains: Information, logistics and outsourcing. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 67(2), 159–164.
  • De Boer, L., Labro, E., & Morlacchi, P. (2001). A review of methods supporting supplier selection. European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 7 (2), 75–89.
  • Dotoli, M., Epicoco, N., Falagario, M., & Sciancalepore, F. (2016). A stochastic cross-efficiency data envelopment analysis approach for supplier selection under uncertainty. International Transactions in Operational Research, 23(4), 725–748.
  • Forker, L. B., & Mendez, D. (2001). An analytical method for benchmarking best peer suppliers. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21 (1/2), 195–209.
  • Govindan, K., & Jepsen, M. B. (2016). Supplier risk assessment based on trapezoidal intuitionistic fuzzy numbers and ELECTRE TRI-C: A case illustration involving service suppliers. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 67(2), 339–376.
  • Hamdi, F., Dupont, L., Ghorbel, A., & Masmoudi, F. (2016). Supplier selection and order allocation under disruption risk. Paper presented at the 8th IFAC Conference on Manufacturing Modelling, Management and Control MIM 2016 (Vol. 49(12), pp. 449–454), France.
  • Heckmann, I., Comes, T., & Nickel, S. (2015). A critical review on supply chain risk - definition, measure and modeling. Omega, 52, 119–132.
  • Ho, W., Xu, X., & Dey, P. K. (2010). Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 202(1), 16–24.
  • Hwang, C.-L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple attribute decision making, methods and applications, a state-of-the-art survey. Berlin: Springer.
  • Liu, F., & Hai, H. L. (2005). The voting analytic hierarchy process method for selecting supplier. International Journal of Production Economics, 97 (3), 308–317.
  • Ng, W. L. (2008). An efficient and simple model for multiple criteria supplier selection problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 186 (3), 1059–1067.
  • Paul, S. K. (2015). Supplier selection for managing supply risks in supply chain: A fuzzy approach. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 79 (1–4), 657–664.
  • Petrovic, D., & Akoz, O. (2008). A fuzzy goal programming approach to integrated loading and scheduling of a batch processing machine. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 59(9), 1211–1219.
  • Ruhrmann, S., Hochdörffer, J., & Lanza, G. (2014). Assessment of dynamics and risks in supplier selection processes. Paper presented at Procedia CIRP 8th International Conference on Digital Enterprise Technology - DET, Stuttgart, Germany. (Vol. 25, pp. 2–9).
  • Sahu, A. K., Datta, S., & Mahapatra, S. S. (2016). Evaluation and selection of resilient suppliers in fuzzy environment: Exploration of fuzzy-VIKOR. Benchmarking , 23(3), 651–673.
  • Sawik, T. (2017). A portfolio approach to supply chain disruption management. International Journal of Production Research, 55 (7), 1970–1991.
  • Şen, A., Yaman, H., Güler, K., & Körpeoğlu, E. (2014). Multi-period supplier selection under price uncertainty. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 65(11), 1636–1648.
  • Shyur, H., & Shih, H. (2006). A hybrid MCDM model for strategic vendor selection. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 44 (7-8), 749–761.
  • Soukup, W. R. (1987). Supplier selection strategies. Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 23(2), 7–12.
  • Takagi, T., & Sugeno, M. (1985). Fuzzy identification of systems and its applications to modelling and control. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-15(1), 116–132.
  • Wang, D., Tian, Y., & Hu, Y. (2004). Empirical study of supplier selection strategies across the supply chain management in manufacturing companies. Paper presented at Proceedings of IEEE International Engineering Management Conference: Innovation and Entrepreneurship for Sustainable Development, IEMC 18 -21 October 2004, Singapore, Category number 04CH37574, Code 64613.
  • Weber, C. A., Current, J. R., & Benton, W. C. (1991). Vendor selection criteria and methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 50 (1), 2–18.
  • Wulan, M., & Petrovic, D. (2012). A fuzzy logic based system for risk analysis and evaluation within enterprise collaborations. Computers in Industry, 63(8), 739–748.
  • Zimmermann, H. (2001). Fuzzy set theory—and its applications. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
  • Zsidisin, G., & Ritchie, B. (2008). Supply chain risk: A handbook of assessment, management, and performance. New York, NY: Springer.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.