Techne and techniques for engaging in a socially complex world

References

• Alston, A., & Dodd, L. (2009). Complex adaptive and inquiring systems theory for contemporary military operations: a multi-perspective approach, Proc. 26 ISMOR International Symposium on Military Operational Research, UK, September 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1996). Organizational learning II: Theory, method and practice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Bar-Yam, Y. (2005). Making things work: Solving complex problems in a complex world. Cambridge: NECSI Knowledge Press. Retrieved from www.necsi.edu
   Google Scholar
• Boin, A., t’Hart, P., Stern, E., & Sundelius, B. (2006). Politics of crisis management: Public leadership under pressure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, J. M., Feltovitch, P. J., Jung, H., Kulkarni, S., Taysom, W., & Uszok, A. (2004). Dimensions of adjustable autonomy and mixed-initiative interaction. In Nickles M (Ed.), Autonomy LNAI 2969 (pp. 17–39). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Checkland, P. B., & Scholes, J. (2001). Soft systems methodology in action. In Rosenhead J and Mingers J (Eds.), Rational analysis for a problematic world revisited. Chichester: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Checkland, P., & Winter, M. (2005). Process and content: Two ways of using SSM. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Churchman, C. (1967). Wicked problems. Management Science, 4, 141–142.
   Google Scholar
• Cooperrider, D. L., & Srivastva, S. (1987). Appreciative inquiry in organizational life. In W. A. Pasmore and R. W. Woodman (Eds.), Research in organization development and change (Vol. 1, pp. 129–169). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
   Google Scholar
• Dodd, L., & Alston, A. (2009). Complex adaptive and “inquiring” systems approaches for contemporary military operations. Cornwallis XIV Societal Conflict and Counter-insurgency, Vienna, April 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Dodd, L., Alston, A., & Stamp, G. (2010). Staged appreciation: Looking out and in for black swans.15th Int. Command and Control Research & Technology Symposium, USA. Retrieved from http://dodccrp.org/events/15th_iccrts_2010/papers/169.pdf (accessed September 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Flood, R. L., & Jackson, M. C. (1991). Creative problem solving: Total systems intervention. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Heuer, R. J., & Randolph, H. P. (2015). Structured analytical techniques for intelligence analysis (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Isaksen, S. G., Dorval, K. B., & Treffinger, D. J. (2010). Creative problem solving: A framework for innovation and change (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, M. C. (2003). Systems thinking: Creative holism for managers. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, M. C. (2006). Beyond problem structuring methods: Reinventing the future of OR/MS. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57, 868–878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menzies-Lyth, I. (1988). Containing anxiety in institutions: Selected essays. Volume 1. Oxford, England: Free Association Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mingers, J., & Rosenhead, J. (2004). Problem structuring methods in action. European Journal of Operational Research, 152, 530–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mingers, J., & White, L. (2010). A review of the recent contribution of systems thinking to operational research and management science. European Journal of Operational Research, 207, 1147–1161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monks, T., Robinson, S., & Kotiadis, K. (2016). Can involving clients in simulation studies help them solve their future problems? A transfer of learning experiment. European Journal of Operational Research, 249, 919–930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, G. (1997). Images of organisation. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, G. (1997). Imaginization: New mindsets for seeing, organizing and managing (new management edition). San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
   Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., & Konno, N. (2000). SECI, Ba and leadership: A unified model of dynamic knowledge creation. Long Range Planning, 33, 5–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ormerod, R. J. (2008). The transformation competence perspective. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 59, 1435–1448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ormerod, R. J. (2013). Research skills for the future: A consultant’s perspective. Journal of Research Practice, 9, Article V2. Retrieved from http://jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp/article/view/380/305
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, N. (2000). Wicked problems and network approaches to resolution. International Public Management Review, 1, 1–19. Retrieved from http://www.ipmr.net
   Google Scholar
• Seagriff, T., & Lord, S. (2011). Soft operational research techniques: Current and future uses. YoungOR, 17, 40–53.
   Google Scholar
• Shackle, G. L. S. (1957). Uncertainty and business decisions (2nd ed.). Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sirett, P., & Dodd, L. (2006). Empirical study to investigate how experience relates to understanding and dealing with strangeness. In Naturalistic decision-making (Vol. 8). San Diego, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Taleb, N. (2008). The black swan: The impact of the highly improbable. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, M. (2008). Organising and disorganising: A dynamic and non-linear theory of institutional emergence and its implications. Devon, UK: Triarchy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ulrich, W. (2003). Beyond methodology choice: Critical systems thinking as critically systems discourse. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 54, 325–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulrich, W., & Dash, D. P. (2013). Research skills for the future: Summary and critique of a comparative study in eight countries. Journal of Research Practice, 9, Article V1. Retrieved from http://jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp/article/view/377/304
   Google Scholar
• Ulrich, W. (2017). If systems thinking is the answer, what is the question? Discussions on research competence. Retrieved from http://wulrich.com/bimonthly_may2017.html
   Google Scholar
• Vickers, G. (1983). Human systems are different. Dunfermline: Paul Chapman.
   Google Scholar
• Welsh, J., & Fearn, D. (2008). Engagement: How public diplomacy in a globalised world. FCO. See case studies by Hudson L and Anstead A, pp. 145–159. Retrieved from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/tna/20080728082554/http://www.fco.gov.uk/en/about-the-fco/publications/publications/pd-publication/casestudies (accessed January 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Williams, B. (2005). Soft systems methodology. The Kellogg Foundation. Retrieved from http://users.actrix.co.nz/bobwill (accessed February 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Wright, C. (2013). Multiple systems thinking methods for resilience research (MPhil thesis). Cardiff University. Retrieved from https://orca.cf.ac.uk/45395/1/2013wrightrcmphil.pdf (accessed March 2018).
   Google Scholar