Supplier’s opportunistic behavior and the quality-efficiency tradeoff with conventional supply chain contracts

References

• Argyres, N. S., & Silverman, B. S. (2004). R&D, organization structure, and the development of corporate technological knowledge. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 929–958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee, S., & Lin, P. (2001). Vertical research joint ventures. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 19(1–2), 285–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bresnahan, T. F., & Reiss, P. C. (1985). Dealer and manufacturer margins. Rand Journal of Economics, 16(2), 253–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cellini, R., & Lambertini, L. (2007). A differential oligopoly game with differentiated goods and sticky prices. European Journal of Operational Research, 176(2), 1131–1144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chenavaz, R. (2012). Dynamic pricing, product and process innovation. European Journal of Operational Research, 222(3), 553–557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colvin, C., & Maravelias, T. (2011). R&D pipeline management: Task interdependencies and risk management. European Journal of Operational Research, 215, 616–628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• d’Aspremont, C., & Jacquemin, A. (1988). Cooperative and noncooperative R&D in duopoly with spillovers. American Economic Review, 78, 1133–1137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daellenbach, U. S., McCarthy, A. M., & Schoenecke, T. S. (1999). Commitment to innovation: The impact of top management team characteristics. R & D Management, 29(3), 199–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dockner, E., Jørgensen, S., Long, N. V., & Sorger, G. (2000). Differential games in economics and management science. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, T. J., & Judge, W. Q. Jr. (2001). Total quality management implementation and competitive advantage: The role of structural control and exploration. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 158–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Ouardighi, F. (2014). Supply quality management with optimal wholesale price and revenue sharing contracts: A two-stage game approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 156, 260–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Ouardighi, F., & Erickson, G. (2015). Production capacity buildup and double marginalization mitigation in a dynamic supply chain. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 66(8), 1281–1296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Ouardighi, F., Erickson, G., Grass, D., & Jørgensen, S. (2016a). Contracts and information structure in a supply chain with operations and marketing interaction. International Game Theory Review, 18(04), 1650014–1650036.
   Google Scholar
• El Ouardighi, F., & Kim, B. (2010). Supply quality management with wholesale price and revenue-sharing contracts under horizontal competition. European Journal of Operational Research, 206(2), 329–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Ouardighi, F., & Kogan, K. (2013). Dynamic conformance and design quality in a supply chain: An assessment of contracts’ coordination power. Annals of Operations Research, 211(1), 137–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Ouardighi, F., Shnaiderman, M., & Pasin, F. (2014). Research and development with stock-dependent spillovers and price competition in a duopoly. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 161(2), 626–647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Ouardighi, F., Kim, B., & Sim, J. E. (2016b). Pollution accumulation and abatement policy in a supply chain. European Journal of Operational Research, 248(3), 982–996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Manjón, J. V., & Romero-Merino, M. E. (2012). Research, development, and firm growth. Empirical evidence from European top R&D spending firms. Research Policy, 41, 1084–1092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garvin, D. (1988). Managing quality. Free Press: New York.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, S. M., & Cvsa, V. (2003). Strategic commitment to price to stimulate downstream innovation in a supply chain. European Journal of Operational Research, 150(3), 617–639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guinta, L. R., & Praizler, N. C. (1992). The QFD book, the team approach to solving problems and satisfying customers through quality function deployment. AMACOM Books: New York.
   Google Scholar
• Hagerty, M. R., Carman, J. M., & Russel, G. J. (1988). Estimating elasticities with PIMS data: Methodological issues and substantive implications. Journal of Marketing Research, 25(1), 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, C., & Liu, Y., T. (2010). Quality investment and inspection policy in a suppliermanufacturer supply chain. European Journal of Operational Research, 202(3), 717–729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iida, T. (2012). Coordination of cooperative cost-reduction efforts in a supply chain partnership. European Journal of Operational Research, 222(2), 180–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksson, O. H. D., Simeth, M., & Seifert, R. W. (2016). Knowledge spillovers in the supply chain: Evidence from the high tech sectors. Research Policy, 45(3), 699–706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamien, M. I., Muller, E., & Zang, I. (1992). Research joint ventures and R&D cartels. American Economic Review, 82, 1293–1306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamien, M. I., & Schwartz, N. L. (1991). The Calculus of Variations and Optimal Control in Economics and Management (2nd ed.). Elsevier: Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, B. (2000). Coordinating an innovation in supply chain management. European Journal of Operational Research, 123(3), 568–584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, B., & El Ouardighi, F. (2007). Supplier–manufacturer collaboration on new product development. In S. Jørgensen, T. Vincent, & M. Quincampoix, (Eds.), Advances in Dynamic Games and Applications to Ecology and Economics (pp. 527–545). Birkhauser: Boston.
   Google Scholar
• Kogan, K., El Ouardighi, F., & Chernonog, T. (2016). Learning by doing with spillovers: Strategic complementarity versus strategic substitutability. Automatica, 67, 282–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kogan, K., El Ouardighi, F., & Herbon, A. (2017). Production with learning and forgetting in a competitive environment. International Journal of Production Economics, 189, 52–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kogan, K., & Tapiero, C. S. (2007). Supply Chain Games: Operations Management and Risk Valuation. Springer, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Lambertini, L. (2012). Dynamic Hotelling duopoly with linear transportation costs. Optimal Control Applications and Methods, 33(1), 114–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambertini, L., Orsini, R., & Palestini, A. (2017). On the instability of the R&D portfolio in a dynamic monopoly. Or, one cannot get two eggs in one basket. International Journal of Production Economics, 193, 703–712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Léonard, D. (1981). The signs of the co-state variables and sufficiency conditions in a class of optimal control problems. Economics Letters, 8(4), 321–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, N. V. (2010). A survey of dynamic games in economics. World Scientific: Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Martin-Herran, G., Taboubi, S., & Zaccour, G. (2012). Dual role of price and myopia in a marketing channel. European Journal of Operational Research, 219(2), 284–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milliou, C. (2009). Endogenous protection of R&D investments. Canadian Journal of Economics, 42, 184–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohr, J., & Spekman, R. (1994). Characteristics of partnership success: Partnership attributes, communication, behavior and conflict resolution techniques. Strategic Management Journal, 15(2), 135–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukhopadhyay, S. K., & Kouvelis, P. (1997). A differential game theoretic model for duopolistic competition on design quality. Operations Research, 45(6), 886–893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perakis, G., & Roels, G. (2007). The price of anarchy in supply chains: Quantifying the efficiency of price-only contracts. Management Science, 53(8), 1249–1268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, J. (2000). Buyer market power and innovative activities: Evidence for the German automobile industry. Review of Industrial Organisation, 16, 13–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. (1990). Have we lost faith in competition? Across the Board, 37, 46.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. (1996). What is strategy? Harvard Business Review, 74, 61–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, T. (1995). Total quality management as competitive advantage: A review and empirical study. Strategic Management Journal, 16(1), 15–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, R., Zhang, J., & Ru, J. (2013). Impacts of power structure on supply chains with uncertain demand. Production and Operations Management, 22, 1232–1249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smets, R. (2004). Mastering complexity and creating value in supply chain management—A supply chain transformation roadmap. Deloitte Consulting Report, New York and London.
   Google Scholar
• Sorger, G. (1989). Competitive dynamic advertising: A modification of the case game. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 13(1), 55–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suarez, E., Calvo-Mora, A., & Roldán, J. L. (2016). The role of strategic planning in excellence management systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 248(2), 532–542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, W. A., & Wright, G. H. (2003). A longitudinal study of TQM implementation: Factors influencing success and failure. Omega, 31(2), 97–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanderWerf, P. A. (1992). Explaining downstream innovation by commodity suppliers with expected innovation benefit. Research Policy, 21(4), 315–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veldman, J., & Gaalman, G. (2014). A model of strategic product quality and process improvement incentives. International Journal of Production Economics, 149, 202–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vonderembse, M. A., & Raghunathan, T. S. (1997). Quality function deployment’s impact on product development. International Journal of Quality Science, 2(4), 253–271.
   Google Scholar
• Waldman, D. A., & Gopalakrishman, M. (1996). Operational, organizational, and human resource factors predictive of customer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Quality Management, 1(1), 91–107.
   Google Scholar
• Yan, T., & Kull, T. (2015). Supplier opportunism in buyer-supplier new product development: A China-U.S. study of antecedents, consequences, and cultural/institutional contexts. Decision Sciences, 46(2), 403–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, K., Zhang, R. Q., & Tsung, F. (2007). Pushing quality improvement along supply chains. Management Science, 53(3), 421–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar