References
- Albatineh, A. N., Niewiadomska-Bugaj, M., & Mihalko, D. (2006). On similarity indices and correction for chance agreement. Journal of Classification, 23(2), 301–313. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00357-006-0017-z
- Amorim, M. J., & Cardoso, M. G. M. S. (2015). Comparing clustering solutions: the use of adjusted paired indices. Intelligent Data Analysis, 19(6), 1275–1296.
- Borg, I., & Groenen, P. J. (2005). Modern multidimensional scaling: Theory and applications. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
- Borg, I., Groenen, P. J., & Mair, P. (2013). Applied multidimensional scaling. SpringerBriefs in statistics. New York: Springer.
- Busing, F. M. (2006). Avoiding degeneracy in metric unfolding by penalizing the intercept. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 59(2), 419–427. doi:https://doi.org/10.1348/000711005X68507
- Busing, F. M. T. A. (2010). Advances in multidimensional unfolding (Doctoral thesis). Leiden University, Leiden.
- Cardoso, M. G. M. S. (2007). Clustering and cross-validation. IASC 07 - Statistics for Data Mining, Learning and Knowledge Extraction, Aveiro, Portugal.
- Cardoso, M. G. M. S., & Carvalho, A. P. D L. F. (2009). Quality indices for (practical) clustering evaluation. Intelligent Data Analysis, 13(5), 725–740. doi:https://doi.org/10.3233/IDA-2009-0390
- Cardoso, M. G. M. S., Faceli, K., & De Carvalho, A. C. P. L. F. (2010). 13 - 18 March 2009). Evaluation of clustering results: The trade-off bias-variability. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. 11th Biennial Conference of the International Federation of Classification Societies, IFCS 2009 and with the 33rd Annual Conf of the German Classification Society (Gesellschaft fur Klassifikation) on Classification as a Tool fo Research, GfKl 2009, Dresden; Germany.
- Cohen, A. (1980). On the graphical display of the significant components in two-way contingency tables. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 9(10), 1025–1041. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03610928008827940
- De Rooij, M., & Heiser, W. J. (2005). Graphical representations and odds ratios in a distance-association model for the analysis of cross-classified data. Psychometrika, 70(1), 99–122. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-000-0848-1
- EEA (2016). Retrieved from http://www.eea.europa.eu/.
- EPA (2016). Greehouse Gas Emissions. Retrieved from https://www3.epa.gov/climatechange/ghgemissions/.
- Everitt, B., & Landau, S. M. L. (2001). Cluster analysis (4th ed.) New York: Wiley.
- Gordon, A. D. (1999). Classification. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
- Gower, J., Groenen, P. J., Van de Velden, M., & Vines, K. (2014). Better perceptual maps: Introducing explanatory icons to facilitate interpretation. Food Quality and Preference, 36, 61–69. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.01.004
- Gower, J. C., Lubbe, S. G., & Le Roux, N. J. (2011). Understanding biplots. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
- Greenacre, M. (2007). Correspondence analysis in practice. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
- Hartigan, J. A., & Kleiner, B. (1981). Mosaics for contingency tables. Computer science and statistics: Proceedings of the 13th Symposium on the Interface.
- Heiser, W. J. (2004). Geometric representation of association between categories. Psychometrika, 69(4), 513–545. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289854
- Horibe, Y. (1985). Entropy and correlation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-15(5), 641–642. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1985.6313441
- Hubert, L., & Arabie, P. (1985). Comparing partitions. Journal of Classification, 2(1), 193–218. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01908075
- Jain, A. K., & Dubes, R. C. (1988). Algorithms for clustering data. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
- Kuhn, H. W. (1955). The Hungarian method for the assignment problem. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 2(1–2), 83–97. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.3800020109
- Lange, T., Roth, V., Braun, M. L., & Buhmann, J. M. (2004). Stability based validation of clustering solutions. Neural Computation, 16(6), 1299–1323. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/089976604773717621
- Meyer, D., Zeileis, A., & Hornik, K. (2008). Visualizing contingency tables Handbook of Data Visualization (pp. 589–616). New York: Springer.
- Mirkin, B. (1998). Mathematical classification and clustering: From how to what and why. New York: Springer.
- Pascual, D., Pla, F., & Sánchez, J. S. (2010). Cluster validation using information stability measures. Pattern Recognition Letters, 31(6), 454–461. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2009.07.009
- Rand, W. M. (1971). Objective criteria for the evaluation of clustering methods. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 66(336), 846–850. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1971.10482356
- Reilly, C., Wang, C., & Rutherford, M. (2005). A rapid method for the comparison of cluster analyses. Statistica Sinica, 15(1), 19–33.
- Riedwyl, H., & Schüpbach, M. (1994). Parquet diagram to plot contingency tables. Softstat, 93, 293–299.
- Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the Dimenson of a Model. The Annals of Statistics, 6(2), 461–464. doi:https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176344136
- Vermunt, J. K., & Magidson, J. (2005). Technical Guide for Latent GOLD 4.0: Basic and advanced Belmont. Belmont, MA: Statistical Innovations Inc.
- Vinh, N. X., Epps, J., & Bailey, J. (2010). Information theoretic measures for clusterings comparison: Variants, properties, normalization and correction for chance. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 11(oct.), 2837–2854.