Optimal planning of technology roadmap under uncertainty

References

• Bertsimas, D., & Sim, M. (2004). The price of robustness. Operations Research, 52(1), 35–53. doi:10.1287/opre.1030.0065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertsimas, D., & Thiele, A. (2006). A robust optimization approach to inventory theory. Operations Research, 54( 1), 150–168. doi:10.1287/opre.1050.0238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou, T. Y., Seng-Cho, T. C., & Tzeng, G. H. (2006). Evaluating IT/IS investments: A fuzzy multi-criteria decision model approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 173(3), 1026–1046. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2005.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daham, H. A., Yang, X., & Warnes, M. K. (2017). An efficient mixed integer programming model for pairing containers in inland transportation based on the assignment of orders. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 68(6), 678–694. doi:10.1057/s41274-016-0132-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denton, B. T., Miller, A. J., Balasubramanian, H. J., & Huschka, T. R. (2010). Optimal allocation of surgery blocks to operating rooms under uncertainty. Operations Research, 58(4-part-1), 802–816. doi:10.1287/opre.1090.0791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henrion, R., & Strugarek, C. (2008). Convexity of chance constraints with independent random variables. Computational Optimization and Applications, 41(2), 263–276. doi:10.1007/s10589-007-9105-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hikkerova, L., Kammoun, N., & Lantz, J. S. (2014). Patent life cycle: New evidence. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 88, 313–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ju, Y., & Sohn, S. Y. (2015). Patent-based QFD framework development for identification of emerging technologies and related business models: A case of robot technology in Korea. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 94, 44–64. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2014.04.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostoff, R. N., & Schaller, R. R. (2001). Science and technology roadmaps. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 48(2), 132–143. doi:10.1109/17.922473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, C., Guan, X., & Wen, X. (2017). A Method for Patent Mining and Its Application in Innovation of High-Altitude Cleaning Robot. Recent Patents on Mechanical Engineering, 10(1), 75–82. doi:10.2174/2212797610666170106155240
   Google Scholar
• LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436–444. doi:10.1038/nature14539
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung, L. C., Van Hui, Y., Chen, G., & Wong, W. H. (2017). Aggregate–disaggregate approach to an airfreight forwarder’s planning under uncertainty: A case study. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 68(6), 695–710. doi:10.1057/s41274-016-0124-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moehrle, M. G., Isenmann, R., & Phaal, R. (2013). Technology roadmapping for strategy and innovation. Charting the Route to Success. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Moehrle, M. G., Walter, L., Geritz, A., & Müller, S. (2010). Patent-based inventor profiles as a basis for human resource decisions in research and development. R and D Management, 35(5), 513–524. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2005.00408.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, H., Kim, K., Choi, S., & Yoon, J. (2013). A patent intelligence system for strategic technology planning. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(7), 2373–2390. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.10.073
   Google Scholar
• Phaal, R., Farrukh, C. J., & Probert, D. R. (2009). Visualising strategy: A classification of graphical roadmap forms. International Journal of Technology Management, 47(4), 286–305. doi:10.1504/IJTM.2009.024431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radauer, A., & Walter, L. (2010). Elements of good practice for providers of publicly funded patent information services for smes – selected and amended results of a benchmarking exercise. World Patent Information, 32(3), 237–245. doi:10.1016/j.wpi.2009.09.003
   Google Scholar
• Savransky, S. D. (2000). Engineering of creativity: introduction to triz methodology of inventive problem solving. New York: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, J. (2005). Collaborative networks as determinants of knowledge diffusion patterns. Management Science, 51(5), 756–770. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1040.0349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tawarmalani, M., & Sahinidis, N. V. (2005). A polyhedral branch-and-cut approach to global optimization. Mathematical Programming, 103(2), 225–249. doi:10.1007/s10107-005-0581-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, J. Z., Chien, C. F., & Gen, M. (2012). Coordinating strategic outsourcing decisions for semiconductor assembly using a bi-objective genetic algorithm. International Journal of Production Research, 50(1), 235–260. doi:10.1080/00207543.2011.571457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, J., Park, H., & Kim, K. (2013). Identifying technological competition trends for R&D planning using dynamic patent maps: SAO-based content analysis. Scientometrics, 94(1), 313–331. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0830-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., Robinson, D. K., Porter, A. L., Zhu, D., Zhang, G., & Lu, J. (2016). Technology roadmapping for competitive technical intelligence. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 110, 175–186. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2015.11.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar