Project portfolio implementation under uncertainty and interdependencies: A simulation study of behavioural responses

Reference

• Aritua, B., Smith, N. J., & Bower, D. (2009). Construction client multi-projects – A complex adaptive systems perspective. International Journal of Project Management, 27(1), 72–79. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beringer, C., Jonas, D., & Kock, A. (2013). Behavior of internal stakeholders in project portfolio management and its impact on success. International Journal of Project Management, 31(6), 830–846. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blichfeldt, B. S., & Eskerod, P. (2008). Project portfolio management – There’s more to it than what management enacts. International Journal of Project Management, 26(4), 357–365. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.06.004
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, T., & Werker, C. (2007). A taxonomy of inference in simulation models. Computational Economics, 30(3), 227–244. doi:10.1007/s10614-007-9102-6
   Google Scholar
• Chao, R. O., & Kavadias, S. S. (2008). A theoretical framework for managing the new product development portfolio: When and how to use strategic buckets. Management Science, 54(5), 907–921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiang, I. R., & Nunez, M. A. (2013). Strategic alignment and value maximization for IT project portfolios. Information Technology and Management, 14(2), 143–157. doi:10.1007/s10799-012-0126-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Childs, P. D., & Triantis, A. J. (1999). Dynamic R&D investment policies. Management Science, 45(10), 1359–1377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, R. G., Edgett, S. J., & Kleinschmidt, E. J. (1997). Portfolio management in new product development: Lessons from the leaders—I. Research-Technology Management, 40(5), 16–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel, P. A., & Daniel, C. (2018). Complexity, uncertainty and mental models: From a paradigm of regulation to a paradigm of emergence in project management. International Journal of Project Management, 36(1), 184–197. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Reyck, B., Grushka-Cockayne, Y., Lockett, M., Calderini, S. R., Moura, M., & Sloper, A. (2005). The impact of project portfolio management on information technology projects. International Journal of Project Management, 23(7), 524–537. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.02.003
   Google Scholar
• Eden, C., Williams, T., Ackermann, F., & Howick, S. (2000). The role of feedback dynamics in disruption and delay on the nature of disruption and delay (D&D) in major projects. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 51(6), 774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engwall, M., & Jerbrant, A. (2003). The resource allocation syndrome: The prime challenge of multi-project management? International Journal of Project Management, 21(6), 403–409.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2008). Curbing optimism bias and strategic misrepresentation in planning: Reference class forecasting in practice. European Planning Studies, 16(1), 3–21. doi:10.1080/09654310701747936
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, D. N., Lyneis, J. M., & Taylor, T. R. (2007). Project controls to minimize cost and schedule overruns: A model, research agenda, and initial results. 2007 International System Dynamics Conference (pp. 23–27).
   Google Scholar
• Howick, S. (2003). Using system dynamics to analyse disruption and delay in complex projects for litigation: Can the modelling purposes be met? Journal of Operational Research Society, 54(3), 222–229. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howick, S., & Eden, C. (2001). The impact of disruption and delay when compressing large projects: Going for incentives? Journal of the Operational Research Society, 52(1), 26–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howick, S., & Eden, C. (2004). On the nature of discontinuities in system dynamics modelling of disrupted projects. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 55(6), 598–605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jafarzadeh, M., Tareghian, H. R., Rahbarnia, F., & Ghanbari, R. (2015). Optimal selection of project portfolios using reinvestment strategy within a flexible time horizon. European Journal of Operational Research, 243(2), 658–664. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2014.12.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291. doi:10.2307/1914185
   Google Scholar
• Keil, M., Mann, J., & Rai, A. (2000). Why software projects escalate: An empirical analysis and test of four theoretical models. MIS Quarterly, 24(4), 631–664. doi:10.2307/3250950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Killen, C. (2013). Visualizations of project interdependencies for porftolio decision making: Evaluation through decision experiments. In Decision Sciences Institute Annual Meeting.
   Google Scholar
• Kopmann, J., Kock, A., Killen, C. P., & Gemunden, H. G. (2015). Business case control in project portfolios – An empirical investigation of performance consequences and moderating effects. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 62(4), 529–543. doi:10.1109/TEM.2015.2454437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korhonen, T., Laine, T., & Martinsuo, M. (2014). Management control of project portfolio uncertainty: A managerial role perspective. Project Management Journal, 45(1), 21–37. doi:10.1002/pmj.21390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KPMG. (2017). Driving business performance: Project management survey 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Kunc, M., & Morecroft, J. (2007). System dynamics modelling for strategic development. Supporting strategy: Frameworks, methods and models. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Lechler, T. G., & Thomas, J. L. (2015). Examining new product development project termination decision quality at the portfolio level: Consequences of dysfunctional executive advocacy. International Journal of Project Management, 33(7), 1452–1463. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loch, C. H. (2000). Tailoring product development to strategy: Case of a European technology manufacturer. European Management Journal, 18(3), 246–258. doi:10.1016/S0263-2373(00)00007-4
   Google Scholar
• Loch, C. H., & Kavadias, S. (2002). Dynamic portfolio selection of NPD programs using marginal returns. Management Science, 48(10), 1227–1241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyneis, J. M., & Ford, D. N. (2007). System dynamics applied to project management: A survey, assessment, and directions for future research. System Dynamics Review, 23(2–3), 157–189. doi:10.1002/sdr.377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinsuo, M. (2013). Project portfolio management in practice and in context. International Journal of Project Management, 31(6), 794–803. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.10.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinsuo, M., Korhonen, T., & Laine, T. (2014). Identifying, framing and managing uncertainties in project portfolios. International Journal of Project Management, 32(5), 732–746. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.01.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson, N. O. (2008). External and internal flexibility–aligning projects with the business strategy and executing projects efficiently. International Journal of Project Organisation and Management, 1(1), 47–64. doi:10.1504/IJPOM.2008.020028
   Google Scholar
• Pala, Ö., Vriens, D. J., & Vennix, J. A. M. (2015). Causal loop diagrams as a de-escalation technique. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 66(4), 593–601. doi:10.1057/jors.2014.24
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, G., & Pan, S. L. (2011). Transition to IS project de-escalation: An exploration into management executives influence behaviors. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 58(1), 109–123. doi:10.1109/TEM.2010.2048908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen, K., & Nielsen, J. A. (2011). Managing uncertainty and conflict in IT project portfolio management. Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research, 13(4), 51–83. doi:10.1080/15228053.2011.10856217
   Google Scholar
• Petit, Y. (2012). Project portfolios in dynamic environments: Organizing for uncertainty. International Journal of Project Management, 30(5), 539–553. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petit, Y., & Hobbs, B. (2010). Project portfolio in dynamic environments: Sources of uncertainty and sensing mechanisms. Project Management Journal, 41(4), 46–58. doi:10.1002/pmj.20201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Planview (2017). The project and portfolio management landscape. Retrieved from https://info.planview.com/rs/456-QCH-520/images/2Planview_Landscape_Report_2017.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• PMI. (2017). Pulse of the profession. Retrieved January 28, 2019, from PMI database.
   Google Scholar
• Repenning, N. P. (2000). A dynamic model of resource allocation in multi-project research and development systems. System Dynamics Review, 16, 173–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, A. G. (2000). The application of system dynamics to project management: An integrated methodology (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Strathclyde, Glasgow.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, A., & Bowers, J. (1996a). The role of system dynamics in project management. International Journal of Project Management, 14(4), 213–220. doi:10.1016/0263-7863(95)00075-5
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, A., & Bowers, J. (1996b). System dynamics in project management: A comparative analysis with traditional methods. System Dynamics Review, 12(2), 121–139. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1727(199622)12:2<121::AID-SDR99>3.3.CO;2-O
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez, H. (2017). A matrix for monitoring the strategic performance of project portfolios. International Journal of Project Organisation and Management, 2(2), 135–153. doi:10.1504/IJPOM.2010.033659
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, R., Slevin, D., & Pinto, J. (1987). Strategy and tactics in a process model of project implementation. Interfaces, 17(3), 34–46. doi:10.1287/inte.17.3.34
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serra, C. E. M., & Kunc, M. (2015). Benefits realisation management and its influence on project success and on the execution of business strategies. International Journal of Project Management, 33(1), 53–66.
   Google Scholar
• Sobtsenko, O., & Tararyko, J. (2009). Control, review and monitoring of a project portfolio: The study of projects in the implementation phase (Bachelor Thesis). Jönköping International Business School, Jönköping.
   Google Scholar
• Son, J., & Rojas, E. M. (2011). Impact of optimism bias regarding organizational dynamics on project planning and control. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 137(2), 147–157. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterman, J. (2000). Business dynamics: Modelling for a complex world. USA: Mc-Graw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Verma, D., & Sinha, K. K. (2002). Toward a theory of project interdependencies in high tech R&D environments. Journal of Operations Management, 20(5), 451–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voss, M., & Kock, A. (2013). Impact of relationship value on project portfolio success – Investigating the moderating effects of portfolio characteristics and external turbulence. International Journal of Project Management, 31(6), 847–861. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L., Kunc, M., & Bai, S. J. (2017). Realizing value from project implementation under uncertainty: An exploratory study using system dynamics. International Journal of Project Management, 35(3), 341–352. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, T., Ackermann, F., & Eden, C. (2003). Structuring a delay and disruption claim: An application of cause-mapping and system dynamics. European Journal of Operational Research, 148(1), 192–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, T., Eden, C., Ackermann, F., & Tait, A. (1995). The effects of design changes and delays on project costs. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 46(7), 809–818. doi:10.2307/2583965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar