A modified DEA-based approach for selecting preferred benchmarks in social networks

References

• Abbasian-Hosseini, S. A., Hsiang, S. M., Leming, M. L., & Liu, M. (2014). From social network to data envelopment analysis: Identifying benchmarks at the site management level. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 140(8), 04014028. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amirteimoori, A., & Kordrostami, S. (2010). A Euclidean distance-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Optimization, 59(7), 985–996. doi:10.1080/02331930902878333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ando, K., Kai, A., Maeda, Y., & Sekitani, K. (2012). Least distance based inefficiency measures on the Pareto-efficient frontier in DEA. Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan, 55(1), 73–91. doi:10.15807/jorsj.55.73
   Google Scholar
• Ang, S., An, Q., Yang, F., & Ji, X. (2019). Target setting with minimum improving costs in data envelopment analysis: A mixed integer linear programming approach. Expert Systems, 36(4), e12408. doi:10.1111/exsy.12408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aparicio, J., & Pastor, J. T. (2014). Closest targets and strong monotonicity on the strongly efficient frontier in DEA. Omega, 44, 51–57. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2013.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baek, C., & Lee, J. D. (2009). The relevance of DEA benchmarking information and the least-distance measure. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 49(1-2), 265–275. doi:10.1016/j.mcm.2008.08.007
   Google Scholar
• Bonacich, P. (1972). Technique for analyzing overlapping memberships. Sociological Methodology, 4, 176–185. doi:10.2307/270732
   Google Scholar
• Brin, S., & Page, L. (1998). The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 30(1-7), 107–117. doi:10.1016/S0169-7552(98)00110-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnes, A. C. T. C., Clark, C. T., Cooper, W. W., & Golany, B. (1984). A developmental study of data envelopment analysis in measuring the efficiency of maintenance units in the US air forces. Annals of Operations Research, 2(1), 95–112. doi:10.1007/BF01874734
   Google Scholar
• Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Blas, C. S., Martin, J. S., & Gonzalez, D. G. (2018). Combined social networks and data envelopment analysis for ranking. European Journal of Operational Research, 266(3), 990–999. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2017.10.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frei, F. X., & Harker, P. T. (1999). Projections onto efficient frontiers: Theoretical and computational extensions to DEA. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 11(3), 275–300. doi:10.1023/A:1007746205433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghahraman, A., & Prior, D. (2016). A learning ladder toward efficiency: Proposing network-based stepwise benchmark selection. Omega, 63, 83–93. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2015.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González, E., & Álvarez, A. (2001). From efficiency measurement to efficiency improvement: The choice of a relevant benchmark. European Journal of Operational Research, 133(3), 512–520. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00195-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahanshahloo, G. R., Junior, H. V., Lotfi, F. H., & Akbarian, D. (2007). A new DEA ranking system based on changing the reference set. European Journal of Operational Research, 181(1), 331–337. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2006.06.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinberg, J. M. (1999). Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. Journal of the ACM, 46(5), 604–632. doi:10.1145/324133.324140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leem, B. H., & Chun, H. (2015). Measuring the influence of efficient ports using social network metrics. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 7, 1–8. doi:10.5772/60040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J. S., Lu, W. M., Yang, C., & Chuang, M. (2009). A network-based approach for increasing discrimination in data envelopment analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 60(11), 1502–1510. doi:10.1057/jors.2009.35
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J. S., & Lu, W. M. (2010). DEA and ranking with the network-based approach: A case of R&D performance. Omega, 38(6), 453–464. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2009.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, W. M., & Lo, S. F. (2009). An interactive benchmark model ranking performers—application to financial holding companies. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 49(1-2), 172–179. doi:10.1016/j.mcm.2008.06.008
   Google Scholar
• Nasrabadi, N., Dehnokhalaji, A., Korhonen, P., & Wallenius, J. (2019). A stepwise benchmarking approach to DEA with interval scale data. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 70(6), 954–961. doi:10.1080/01605682.2018.1471375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, J., Bae, H., & Lim, S. (2012). Stepwise benchmarking path selection in DEA. In J. Watada, T. Watanabe, G. Phillips-Wren, R. Howlett, & L. Jain (Eds.), Intelligent decision technologies (pp. 477–484). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Park, J., & Sung, S. I. (2016). Integrated approach to construction of benchmarking network in DEA-based stepwise benchmark target selection. Sustainability, 8(7), 600. doi:10.3390/su8070600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Premachandra, I. M. (2001). A note on DEA vs principal component analysis: An improvement to Joe Zhu's approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 132(3), 553–560. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00145-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seiford, L. M., & Zhu, J. (2003). Context-dependent data envelopment analysis—measuring attractiveness and progress. Omega, 31(5), 397–408. doi:10.1016/S0305-0483(03)00080-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, M. J., & Yu, S. J. (2010). Benchmark optimization and attribute identification for improvement of container terminals. European Journal of Operational Research, 201(2), 568–580. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2009.03.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tone, K. (2001). A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 130(3), 498–509. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00407-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torgersen, A. M., Førsund, F. R., & Kittelsen, S. A. C. (1996). Slack-adjusted efficiency measures and ranking of efficient units. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 7(4), 379–398. doi:10.1007/BF00162048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, F., Chu, J., Song, J. & Yang, F. (2019). A cross-bargaining game approach for direction selection in the directional distance function. OR Spectrum, 41(3), 787–807. doi:10.1007/s00291-019-00557-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, J., Liang, L., & Yang, F. (2009). Achievement and benchmarking of countries at the summer Olympics using cross efficiency evaluation method. European Journal of Operational Research, 197(2), 722–730. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2008.06.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, J. (1998). Data envelopment analysis vs. principal component analysis: An illustrative study of economic performance of Chinese cities. European Journal of Operational Research, 111(1), 50–61. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00321-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, J. (2000). Multi-factor performance measure model with an application to Fortune 500 companies. European Journal of Operational Research, 123(1), 105–124. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00096-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar