Bounded-change target-setting approach: Selection of a realistic benchmarking path

References

• Amirteimoori, A., & Kordrostami, S. (2012). Generating strong defining hyperplanes of the production possibility set in data envelopment analysis. Applied Mathematics Letters, 25(3), 605–609. doi:10.1016/j.aml.2011.09.068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An, Q., Meng, F., Xiong, B., Wang, Z., & Chen, X. (2018). Assessing the relative efficiency of Chinese high-tech industries: a dynamic network data envelopment analysis approach. Annals of Operations Research, doi:10.1007/s10479-018-2883-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An, Q., Tao, X., Dai, B., & Li, J. (2019). Modified distance friction minimization model with undesirable output: An application to the environmental efficiency of China’s regional industry. Computational Economics, doi:10.1007/s10614-019-09888-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aparicio, J., Cordero, J. M., & Pastor, J. T. (2017). The determination of the least distance to the strongly efficient frontier in Data Envelopment Analysis oriented models: Modelling and computational aspects. Omega, 71, 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2016.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aparicio, J., Ruiz, J. L., & Sirvent, I. (2007). Closest targets and minimum distance to the Pareto-efficient frontier in DEA. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 28(3), 209–218. doi:10.1007/s11123-007-0039-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078–1092. doi:10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, R. S., Durchholz, M. L., & Seiford, L. (2000). Peeling the DEA onion: Layering and rank-ordering DMUs using tiered DEA. Southern Methodist University Technical Report, 5, 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Beale, E. M. L., & Tomlin, J. A. (1970). Special facilities in a general mathematical programming system for non-convex problems using ordered sets of variables. In J. Lawrence, editor, Proceedings 5th IFORS Conference, pages 447–454. Tavistock, London & Wiley, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Golany, B., Seiford, L., & Stutz, J. (1985). Foundations of data envelopment analysis for Pareto-Koopmans efficient empirical production functions. Journal of Econometrics, 30(1–2), 91–107. doi:10.1016/0304-4076(85)90133-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chul Park, S., & Lee, J. H. (2018). Supplier selection and stepwise benchmarking: A new hybrid model using DEA and AHP based on cluster analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 69(3), 449–466. doi:10.1057/s41274-017-0203-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, W. D., Ruiz, J. L., Sirvent, I., & Zhu, J. (2017). Within-group common benchmarking using DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 256(3), 901–910. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2016.06.074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, W. D., Tone, K., & Zhu, J. (2014). Data envelopment analysis: Prior to choosing a model. Omega, 44, 1–4. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2013.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, W. W., Park, K. S., & Pastor, J. T. (1999). RAM: A range adjusted measure of inefficiency for use with additive models, and relations to other models and measures in DEA. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 11(1), 5–42. doi:10.1023/A:1007701304281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daraio, C., & Simar, L. (2016). Efficiency and benchmarking with directional distances: A data-driven approach. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 67(7), 928–944. doi:10.1057/jors.2015.111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dirick, L., Claeskens, G., & Baesens, B. (2017). Time to default in credit scoring using survival analysis: A benchmark study. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 68(6), 652–665. doi:10.1057/s41274-016-0128-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estrada, S. A., Song, H. S., Kim, Y. A., Namn, S. H., & Kang, S. C. (2009). A method of stepwise benchmarking for inefficient DMUs based on the proximity-based target selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(9), 11595–11604. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2009.03.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, L. (2015). Centralized resource allocation based on efficiency analysis for step-by-step improvement paths. Omega, 51, 24–28. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2014.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghahraman, A., & Prior, D. (2016). A learning ladder toward efficiency: Proposing network-based stepwise benchmark selection. Omega, 63, 83–93. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2015.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golany, B., & Roll, Y. (1989). An application procedure for DEA. Omega, 17(3), 237–250. doi:10.1016/0305-0483(89)90029-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, H. K., Ha, S. H., Shin, C. K., Park, S. C., & Kim, S. H. (1999). Evaluating the efficiency of system integration projects using data envelopment analysis (DEA) and machine learning. Expert Systems with Applications, 16(3), 283–296. doi:10.1016/S0957-4174(98)00077-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, S. A., & Zhu, J. (2003). Identifying “best” applicants in recruiting using data envelopment analysis. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 37(2), 125–139. doi:10.1016/S0038-0121(02)00048-4
   Google Scholar
• Khodakarami, M., Shabani, A., & Saen, R. F. (2014). A new look at measuring sustainability of industrial parks: A two-stage data envelopment analysis approach. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 16(8), 1577–1596. doi:10.1007/s10098-014-0733-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon, H. B., Marvel, J. H., & Roh, J. J. (2017). Three-stage performance modeling using DEA–BPNN for better practice benchmarking. Expert Systems with Applications, 71, 429–441. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2016.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, S., Bae, H., & Lee, L. H. (2011). A study on the selection of benchmarking paths in DEA. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(6), 7665–7673. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2010.12.148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, W., & Lin, B. (2018). Analysis of energy efficiency and its influencing factors in China's transport sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 170, 674–682. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lotfi, F. H., Jahanshahloo, G. R., Mozaffari, M. R., & Gerami, J. (2011). Finding DEA-efficient hyperplanes using MOLP efficient faces. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 235(5), 1227–1231. doi:10.1016/j.cam.2010.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lozano, S., & Calzada-Infante, L. (2018). Computing gradient-based stepwise benchmarking paths. Omega, 81, 195–207. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2017.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lozano, S., & Villa, G. (2005). Determining a sequence of targets in DEA. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 56(12), 1439–1447. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lozano, S., & Villa, G. (2010). Gradual technical and scale efficiency improvement in DEA. Annals of Operations Research, 173(1), 123–136. doi:10.1007/s10479-009-0583-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morita, H., Hirokawa, K., & Zhu, J. (2005). A slack-based measure of efficiency in context-dependent data envelopment analysis. Omega, 33(4), 357–362. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2004.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, J., Bae, H., & Lim, S. (2012a). A DEA-based method of stepwise benchmark target selection with preference, direction and similarity criteria. International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control, 8(8), 5821–5834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, J., Bae, H., & Lim, S. (2012b). Stepwise benchmarking path selection in DEA. In J. Watada, T. Watanabe, G. Phillips-Wren, R. Howlett, & L. Jain (eds.), Intelligent Decision Technologies (pp. 477–484). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Park, J., & Sung, S. I. (2016). Integrated approach to construction of benchmarking network in DEA-based stepwise benchmark target selection. Sustainability, 8(7) Article Number 600. doi:10.3390/su8070600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrović, M., Bojković, N., Anić, I., Stamenković, M., & Tarle, S. P. (2014). An ELECTRE-based decision aid tool for stepwise benchmarking: An application over EU Digital Agenda targets. Decision Support Systems, 59, 230–241. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2013.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramón, N., Ruiz, J. L., & Sirvent, I. (2018). Two-step benchmarking: Setting more realistically achievable targets in DEA. Expert Systems with Applications, 92, 124–131. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2017.09.044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz, J. L., Segura, J. V., & Sirvent, I. (2015). Benchmarking and target setting with expert preferences: An application to the evaluation of educational performance of Spanish universities. European Journal of Operational Research, 242(2), 594–605. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2014.10.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz, J. L., & Sirvent, I. (2016). Common benchmarking and ranking of units with DEA. Omega, 65, 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2015.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seiford, L. M., & Zhu, J. (1999). Profitability and marketability of the top 55 US commercial banks. Management Science, 45(9), 1270–1288. doi:10.1287/mnsc.45.9.1270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seiford, L. M., & Zhu, J. (2003). Context-dependent data envelopment analysis—Measuring attractiveness and progress. Omega, 31(5), 397–408. doi:10.1016/S0305-0483(03)00080-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, M. J., & Yu, S. J. (2009). Performance based stratification and clustering for benchmarking of container terminals. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(3), 5016–5022. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2008.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, M. J., & Yu, S. J. (2010). Benchmark optimization and attribute identification for improvement of container terminals. European Journal of Operational Research, 201(2), 568–580. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2009.03.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki, S., & Nijkamp, P. (2011). A stepwise-projection data envelopment analysis for public transport operations in Japan. Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, 4(2), 139–156. doi:10.1007/s12076-011-0058-8
   Google Scholar
• Tone, K. (2002). A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 143(1), 32–41. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00324-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, B., Baesens, B., Backiel, A., & Vanden Broucke, S. K. (2018). Benchmarking sampling techniques for imbalance learning in churn prediction. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 69(1), 49–65. doi:10.1057/s41274-016-0176-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar