Multi-class misclassification cost matrix for credit ratings in peer-to-peer lending

References

• Alejo, R., García, V., Marqués, A. I., Sánchez, J. S., & Antonio-Velázquez, J. A. (2013). Making accurate credit risk predictions with cost-sensitive mlp neural networks. In Management intelligent systems (pp. 1–8). Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bachmann, A., Becker, A., Buerckner, D., Hilker, M. K. M., Lehmann, M., & Tiburtius, P. (2011). Online peer-to-peer lending-a literature review. Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 16(2), 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Bahnsen, A. C., Aouada, D., & Ottersten, B. (2014). Example-dependent cost-sensitive logistic regression for credit scoring. In 2014 13th International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA) (pp. 263–269). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Bahnsen, A. C., Aouada, D., & Ottersten, B. (2015). Example-dependent cost-sensitive decision trees. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(19), 6609–6619. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2015.04.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahnsen, A. C., Stojanovic, A., Aouada, D., & Ottersten, B. (2013). Cost sensitive credit card fraud detection using Bayes minimum risk. In 2013 12th International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA) (Vol. 1, pp. 333–338). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Beling, P., Covaliu, Z., & Oliver, R. M. (2005). Optimal scoring cutoff policies and efficient frontiers. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 56(9), 1016–1029. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butaru, F., Chen, Q., Clark, B., Das, S., Lo, A. W., & Siddique, A. (2016). Risk and risk management in the credit card industry. Journal of Banking & Finance, 72, 218–239. doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2016.07.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chao, X., & Peng, Y. (2018). A cost-sensitive multi-criteria quadratic programming model for imbalanced data. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 69(4), 500–516. doi:10.1057/s41274-017-0233-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, N., Ribeiro, B., & Chen, A. (2016). Financial credit risk assessment: A recent review. Artificial Intelligence Review, 45(1), 1–23. doi:10.1007/s10462-015-9434-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, B., & Hampshire, R. (2010). Sending mixed signals: Multilevel reputation effects in peer-to-peer lending markets. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 197–206). ACM. doi:10.1145/1718918.1718955
   Google Scholar
• Domingos, P. (1999). Metacost: A general method for making classifiers cost-sensitiv. In Proceedings of the Fifth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 155–164). ACM. doi:10.1145/312129.312220
   Google Scholar
• Edelberg, W. (2006). Risk-based pricing of interest rates for consumer loans. Journal of Monetary Economics, 53(8), 2283–2298. doi:10.1016/j.jmoneco.2005.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, E., Hall, M. A., & Witten, I. H. (2016). The WEKA workbench. Online appendix for “Data mining: Practical machine learning tools and techniques” (4th ed.). Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Elkan, C. (2001). The foundations of cost-sensitive learning. In International joint conference on artificial intelligence. (Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 973–978). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Fiore, U., De Santis, A., Perla, F., Zanetti, P., & Palmieri, F. (2017). Using generative adversarial networks for improving classification effectiveness in credit card fraud detection. Information Sciences, 479, 448–455. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2017.12.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florez-Lopez, R., & Ramon-Jeronimo, J. M. (2014). Modelling credit risk with scarce default data: On the suitability of cooperative bootstrapped strategies for small low-default portfolios. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 65(3), 416–434. doi:10.1057/jors.2013.119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galloway, I. (2009). Peer-to-peer lending and community development finance. Community Investments, 21(3), 19–23.
   Google Scholar
• Ge, R., Feng, J., Gu, B., & Zhang, P. (2017). Predicting and deterring default with social media information in peer-to-peer lending. Journal of Management Information Systems, 34(2), 401–424. doi:10.1080/07421222.2017.1334472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guan, D., Yuan, W., Ma, T., Khattak, A. M., & Chow, F. (2017). Cost-sensitive elimination of mislabeled training data. Information Sciences, 402, 170–181. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2017.03.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, Y., Zhou, W., Luo, C., Liu, C., & Xiong, H. (2016). Instance-based credit risk assessment for investment decisions in P2P lending. European Journal of Operational Research, 249(2), 417–426. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2015.05.050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hand, D. J., Whitrow, C., Adams, N. M., Juszczak, P., & Weston, D. (2008). Performance criteria for plastic card fraud detection tools. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 59(7), 956–962. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, Y., Feng, B., Mo, X., Zhang, X., Ngai, E. W. T., Fan, M., & Liu, M. (2015). Cost-sensitive and ensemble-based prediction model for outsourced software project risk prediction. Decision Support Systems, 72, 11–23. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2015.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Y., & Kou, G. (2014). A kernel entropy manifold learning approach for financial data analysis. Decision Support Systems, 64, 31–42. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2014.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klafft, M. (2008). Peer to peer lending: Auctioning microcredits over the internet. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, Technology and Management. Dubai: IMT.
   Google Scholar
• Kou, G., Ergu, D., Lin, C., & Chen, Y. (2016). Pairwise comparison matrix in multiple criteria decision making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 22(5), 738–765. doi:10.3846/20294913.2016.1210694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kou, G., Lu, Y., Peng, Y., & Shi, Y. (2012). Evaluation of classification algorithms using MCDM and rank correlation. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 11(01), 197–225. doi:10.1142/S0219622012500095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kou, G., Peng, Y., & Wang, G. (2014). Evaluation of clustering algorithms for financial risk analysis using MCDM methods. Information Sciences, 275, 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2014.02.137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanzarini, L. C., Villa Monte, A., Bariviera, A. F., & Jimbo Santana, P. (2017). Simplifying credit scoring rules using LVQ + PSO. Kybernetes, 46(1), 8–16. doi:10.1108/K-06-2016-0158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lending Club. (2017). Data from: Lending club statistics [Dataset]. Retrieved from https://www.lendingclub.com/info/download-data.action.
   Google Scholar
• Lessmann, S., Baesens, B., Seow, H. V., & Thomas, L. C. (2015). Benchmarking state-of-the-art classification algorithms for credit scoring: An update of research. European Journal of Operational Research, 247(1), 124–136. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2015.05.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, T., Kou, G., Peng, Y., & Shi, Y. (2017). Classifying with adaptive hyper-spheres: An incremental classifier based on competitive learning. In IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems (pp. 1–12). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Luo, C., Wu, D., & Wu, D. (2017). A deep learning approach for credit scoring using credit default swaps. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 65, 465–470. doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2016.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maldonado, S., Bravo, C., Lopez, J., & Perez, J. (2017). Integrated framework for profit-based feature selection and SVM classification in credit scoring. Decision Support Systems, 104, 113–121. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2017.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marqués, A. I., García, V., & Sánchez, J. S. (2013). On the suitability of resampling techniques for the class imbalance problem in credit scoring. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 64(7), 1060–1070. doi:10.1057/jors.2012.120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morente-Molinera, J. A., Mezei, J., Carlsson, C., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2017). Improving supervised learning classification methods using multi-granular linguistic modelling and fuzzy entropy. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 25(5), 1078–1089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, Y., Wang, G., Kou, G., & Shi, Y. (2011). An empirical study of classification algorithm evaluation for financial risk prediction. Applied Soft Computing, 11(2), 2906–2915. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2010.11.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahin, Y., Bulkan, S., & Duman, E. (2013). A cost-sensitive decision tree approach for fraud detection. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(15), 5916–5923. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2013.05.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santana, P. J., Lanzarini, L., & Bariviera, A. F. (2018). Fuzzy Credit Risk Scoring Rules using FRvarPSO. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 26(Suppl. 1), 39–57. doi:10.1142/S0218488518400032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuermann, T. (2004). What do we know about loss given default?
   Google Scholar
• Serrano-Cinca, C., & Gutiérrez-Nieto, B. (2016). The use of profit scoring as an alternative to credit scoring systems in peer-to-peer (P2P) lending. Decision Support Systems, 89, 113–122. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2016.06.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serrano-Cinca, C., Gutierrez-Nieto, B., & López-Palacios, L. (2015). Determinants of default in P2P lending. PloS One, 10(10), e0139427doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0139427
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, J., Shang, Z., & Li, H. (2014). Imbalance-oriented SVM methods for financial distress prediction: A comparative study among the new SB-SVM-ensemble method and traditional methods. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 65(12), 1905–1919. doi:10.1057/jors.2013.117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tapkan, P., Özbakır, L., Kulluk, S., & Baykasoğlu, A. (2016). A cost-sensitive classification algorithm: BEE-Miner. Knowledge-Based Systems, 95, 99–113. doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2015.12.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbraken, T., Bravo, C., Weber, R., & Baesens, B. (2014). Development and application of consumer credit scoring models using profit-based classification measures. European Journal of Operational Research, 238(2), 505–513. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2014.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H., Kou, G., & Peng, Y. (2018). Cost-sensitive classifiers in credit rating: A comparative study on P2P lending. In 2018 7th International Conference on Computers Communications and Control (ICCCC) (pp. 210–213). IEEE. doi:10.1109/ICCCC.2018.8390460
   Google Scholar
• Wu, W., & Kou, G. (2016). A group consensus model for evaluating real estate investment alternatives. Financial Innovation, 2(1), 8. doi:10.1186/s40854-016-0027-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia, Y., Liu, C., & Liu, N. (2017). Cost-sensitive boosted tree for loan evaluation in peer-to-peer lending. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 24, 30–49. doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2017.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, J., Chen, D., & Chau, M. (2016). Identifying features for detecting fraudulent loan requests on P2P platforms. In 2016 IEEE Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics (ISI) (pp. 79–84). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, B., Baesens, B., Backiel, A., & Vanden Broucke, S. K. (2018). Benchmarking sampling techniques for imbalance learning in churn prediction. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 69(1), 49–65. doi:10.1057/s41274-016-0176-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar