References
- Aboutorab, H., Saberi, M., Asadabadi, M. R., Hussain, O., & Chang, E. (2018). ZBWM: The Z-number extension of best worst method and its application for supplier development. Expert Systems with Applications, 107, 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.04.015
- Akpieyi, A., Tudor, T. L., & Dutra, C. (2015). The utilisation of risk-based frameworks for managing healthcare waste: A case study of the National Health Service in London. Safety Science, 72, 127–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2014.08.014
- Aliev, R. A., & Zeinalova, L. M. (2014). Decision making under Z-Information. In P. Guo & W. Pedrycz (Eds.), Human-Centric Decision-Making Models for Social Sciences (pp. 233–252). Springer.
- Aliev, R. A., Alizadeh, A. V., & Huseynov, O. H. (2015). The arithmetic of discrete Z-numbers. Information Sciences, 290, 134–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2014.08.024
- Aliev, R. A., Huseynov, O. H., & Zeinalova, L. M. (2016). The arithmetic of continuous Z-numbers. Information Sciences, 373, 441–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2016.08.078
- Aliev, R. A., Pedrycz, W., Huseynov, O. H., & Eyupoglu, S. Z. (2017). Approximate reasoning on a basis of Z-Number valued If-then rules. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 25(6), 1589–1600. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2016.2612303
- Azadeh, A., & Kokabi, R. (2016). Z-number DEA: A new possibilistic DEA in the context of Z-numbers. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 30(3), 604–617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2016.07.005
- Azadeh, A., Saberi, M., Atashbar, N. Z., Chang, E., & Pazhoheshfar, P. (2013, July). Z-AHP: A Z-number extension of fuzzy analytical hierarchy process. In DEST 2013. 2013 7th IEEE International Conference on Digital Ecosystems and Technologies (pp. 141–147). IEEE.
- Banerjee, P., Hazra, A., Ghosh, P., Ganguly, A., Murmu, N. C., & Chatterjee, P. K. (2019). Solid waste management in India: A brief review. In Waste management and resource efficiency (pp. 1027–1049). Springer.
- Banerjee, R., & Pal, S. K. (2015). Z*-numbers: Augmented Z-numbers for machine-subjectivity representation. Information Sciences, 323, 143–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2015.06.026
- Banerjee, R., & Pal, S. K. (2017). A computational model for the endogenous arousal of thoughts through Z*-numbers. Information Sciences, 405, 227–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2017.03.035
- Brent, A. C., Rogers, D. E. C., Ramabitsa-Siimane, T. S. M., & Rohwer, M. B. (2007). Application of the analytical hierarchy process to establish health care waste management systems that minimise infection risks in developing countries. European Journal of Operational Research, 181(1), 403–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.06.015
- Caniato, M., Tudor, T. L., & Vaccari, M. (2016). Assessment of health-care waste management in a humanitarian crisis: A case study of the Gaza Strip. Waste Management, 58, 386–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.09.017
- Chauhan, A., & Singh, A. (2016). A hybrid multi-criteria decision making method approach for selecting a sustainable location of healthcare waste disposal facility. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 1001–1010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.098
- Chen, S. H., & Hsieh, C. H. (2000). Representation, ranking, distance, and similarity of LR type fuzzy number and application. Australian Journal of Intelligent Processing Systems, 6(4), 217–229.
- Chen, S. M., Cheng, S. H., & Lan, T. C. (2016). A novel similarity measure between intuitionistic fuzzy sets based on the centroid points of transformed fuzzy numbers with applications to pattern recognition. Information Sciences, 343–344, 15–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2016.01.040
- Cheng, C. H. (1998). A new approach for ranking fuzzy numbers by distance method. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 95(3), 307–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(96)00272-2
- Chu, Y., Sun, L., & Li, L. (2019). Lightweight scheme selection for automotive safety structures using a quantifiable multi-objective approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 241, 118316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118316
- Cozendey-Silva, E. N., Silva, C. R., Larentis, A. L., Wasserman, J. C., Rozemberg, B., & Teixeira, L. R. (2016). Cross-cultural adaptation of an environmental health measurement instrument: Brazilian version of the health-care waste management • rapid assessment tool. BMC Public Health, 16(1), 928. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3618-4
- Dubois, D., & Prade, H. (1978). Operations on fuzzy numbers. International Journal of Systems Science, 9(6), 613–626. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207727808941724
- Dursun, M., Karsak, E. E., & Karadayi, M. A. (2011a). Assessment of health-care waste treatment alternatives using fuzzy multi-criteria decision making approaches. Resources Conservation and Recycling, 57, 98–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.09.012
- Dursun, M., Karsak, E. E., & Karadayi, M. A. (2011b). A fuzzy multi-criteria group decision making framework for evaluating health-care waste disposal alternatives. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(9), 11453–11462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.03.019
- Farhadinia, B. (2016). Multiple criteria decision-making methods with completely unknown weights in hesitant fuzzy linguistic term setting. Knowledge-Based Systems, 93, 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2015.11.008
- Gomes, L. F. A. M., & Lima, M. M. P. P. (1991). TODIM: Basics and application to multicriteria ranking of projects with environmental impacts. Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences, 16(4), 113–127.
- Gomes, L. F. A. M., & Lima, M. M. P. P. (1992). From modeling individual preferences to multicriteria ranking of discrete alternatives: A look at prospect theory and the additive difference model. Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences, 17(3), 171–184.
- Gomes, L. F. A. M., & Rangel, L. A. D. (2009). An application of the TODIM method to the multicriteria rental evaluation of residential properties. European Journal of Operational Research, 193(1), 204–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2007.10.046
- Hangulu, L., & Akintola, O. (2017). Perspectives of policy-makers and stakeholders about health care waste management in community-based care in South Africa: A qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research, 17(1), 290. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2236-x
- Ikeda, Y. (2017). Current status of home medical care waste collection by nurses in Japan. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 67(2), 139–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2016.1228551
- Kang, B., Wei, D., Li, Y., & Deng, Y. (2012a). Decision making using Z-numbers under uncertain environment. Journal of Computational Information Systems, 8(7), 2807–2814.
- Kang, B., Wei, D., Li, Y., & Deng, Y. (2012b). A method of converting Z-number to classical fuzzy number. Journal of Information and Computational Science, 9(3), 703–709.
- Klir, G. J., & Yuan, B. (1995). Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic: Theory and applications. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.
- Krohling, R. A., Pacheco, A. G. C., & Siviero, A. L. T. (2013). IF-TODIM: An intuitionistic fuzzy TODIM to multi-criteria decision making. Knowledge-Based Systems, 53, 142–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2013.08.028
- Kumar, P., Singh, R. K., & Vaish, A. (2017). Suppliers’ green performance evaluation using fuzzy extended ELECTRE approach. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 19(3), 809–821. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-016-1268-y
- Li, X. H., & Chen, X. H. (2015). Trapezoidal intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operator based on Choquet Integral and its application to multi-criteria decision-making problems. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 2(3), 266–276. https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FEM-2015048
- Li, X. H., & Chen, X. H. (2018). D-intuitionistic hesitant fuzzy sets and their application in multiple attribute decision making. Cognitive Computation, 10(3), 496–505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-018-9544-2
- Li, X. H., & Chen, X. H. (2019). Belief structure-based induced aggregation operators in decision making with hesitant fuzzy information. Neural Computing and Applications, 31(12), 8917–8929. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3947-6
- Liu, H. C., Wu, J., & Li, P. (2013). Assessment of health-care waste disposal methods using a VIKOR-based fuzzy multi-criteria decision making method. Waste Management, 33(12), 2744–2751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2013.08.006
- Liu, H. C., You, J. X., Lu, C., & Chen, Y. Z. (2015). Evaluating health-care waste treatment technologies using a hybrid multi-criteria decision making model. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 41, 932–942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.08.061
- Lourenzutti, R., & Krohling, R. A. (2013). A study of TODIM in a intuitionistic fuzzy and random environment. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(16), 6459–6468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.05.070
- Lourenzutti, R., Krohling, R. A., & Reformat, M. Z. (2017). Choquet based TOPSIS and TODIM for dynamic and heterogeneous decision making with criteria interaction. Information Sciences, 408, 41–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2017.04.037
- Makajic-Nikolic, D., Petrovic, N., Belic, A., Rokvic, M., Radakovic, J. A., & Tubic, V. (2016). The fault tree analysis of infectious medical waste management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 113, 365–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.022
- Mir, M. A., Taherei Ghazvinei, P., Sulaiman, N. M. N., Basri, N. E. A., Saheri, S., Mahmood, N. Z., Jahan, A., Begum, R. A., & Aghamohammadi, N. (2016). Application of TOPSIS and VIKOR improved versions in a multi criteria decision analysis to develop an optimized municipal solid waste management model. Journal of Environmental Management, 166, 109–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.09.028
- Morrissey, A. J., & Browne, J. (2004). Waste management models and their application to sustainable waste management. Waste Management, 24(3), 297–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2003.09.005
- Pal, S. K., Banerjee, R., Dutta, S., & Sarma, S. S. (2013). An insight into the Z-number approach to CWW. Fundamenta Informaticae, 124(1–2), 197–229. https://doi.org/10.3233/FI-2013-831
- Patel, P., Khorasani, E. S., & Rahimi, S. (2016). Modeling and implementation of Z-number. Soft Computing, 20(4), 1341–1364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-015-1591-y
- Pepin, J., Chakra, C. N. A., Pepin, E., Nault, V., & Valiquette, L. (2014). Evolution of the global burden of viral infections from unsafe medical injections, 2000-2010. PLoS One., 9(6), e99677. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099677
- Qian, W. Y., Wang, Z. J., & Li, K. W. (2016). Medical waste disposal method selection based on a hierarchical decision model with intuitionistic fuzzy relations. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13(9), 896. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13090896
- Qin, J. D., Liu, X. W., & Pedrycz, W. (2017). An extended TODIM multi-criteria group decision making method for green supplier selection in interval type-2 fuzzy environment. European Journal of Operational Research, 258(2), 626–638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.09.059
- Qin, Q. D., Liang, F. Q., Li, L., Chen, Y. W., & Yu, G. F. (2017). A TODIM-based multi-criteria group decision making with triangular intuitionistic fuzzy numbers. Applied Soft Computing, 55, 93–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2017.01.041
- Ren, P. J., Xu, Z. S., & Gou, X. J. (2016). Pythagorean fuzzy TODIM approach to multi-criteria decision making. Applied Soft Computing, 42, 246–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2015.12.020
- Sang, X. Z., & Liu, X. W. (2016). An interval type-2 fuzzy sets-based TODIM method and its application to green supplier selection. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 67(5), 722–734. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2015.86
- Shi, H., Liu, H. C., Li, P., & Xu, X. G. (2017). An integrated decision making approach for assessing healthcare waste treatment technologies from a multiple stakeholder. Waste Management, 59, 508–517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.11.016
- Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R., Sotoudeh-Anvari, A., & Siadat, A. (2015). A multi-criteria group decision-making approach for facility location selection using PROMETHEE under a fuzzy environment. In B. Kaminski, G. E. Kersten & T. Szapiro (Eds.), Outlooks and insights on group decision and negotiation, GDN 2015 (Vol. 218, pp. 145–156). Springer.
- Wang, Y. J., & Lee, H. S. (2008). The revised method of ranking fuzzy numbers with an area between the centroid and original points. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 55(9), 2033–2042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2007.07.015
- Wang, Y. M., Yang, J. B., Xu, D. L., & Chin, K. S. (2006). On the centroids of fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 157(7), 919–926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2005.11.006
- Wei, C. P., Ren, Z. L., & Rodriguez, R. M. (2015). A hesitant fuzzy linguistic TODIM method based on a score function. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 8(4), 701–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/18756891.2015.1046329
- WHO, & UNICEF (2015). Water, sanitation and hygiene in health care facilities: Status in low-and middle-income countries and way forward. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/154588
- WHO. (2015). Health-care waste fact sheet No. 253. http://who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs253/en/
- Xin, Y. T. (2015). Comparison of hospital medical waste generation rate based on diagnosis-related groups. Journal of Cleaner Production, 100, 202–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.056
- Yaakob, A. M., & Gegov, A. (2016). Interactive TOPSIS based group decision making methodology using Z-numbers. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 9(2), 311–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/18756891.2016.1150003
- Yager, R. R. (2012). On Z-valuations using Zadeh’s Z-numbers. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 27(3), 259–278. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21521
- Zadeh, L. A. (2011). A note on Z-numbers. Information Sciences, 181(14), 2923–2932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2011.02.022
- Zhang, X. L., & Xu, Z. S. (2014). The TODIM analysis approach based on novel measured functions under hesitant fuzzy environment. Knowledge-Based Systems, 61, 48–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2014.02.006