References
- Baesens, B., Van Gestel, T., Stepanova, M., Van den Poel, D., & Vanthienen, J. (2005). Neural network survival analysis for personal loan data. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 56(9), 1089–1098. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601990
- Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324
- Chancharat, N., Tian, G., Davy, P., McCrae, M., & Lodh, S. (2010). Multiple state of financially distressed companies: Tests using a Competing-Risks Model. Australian Accounting Business and Finance Journal, 4, 27–44.
- Dirick, L., Claeskens, G., & Baesens, B. (2015). An Akaike information criterion for multiple event mixture cure models. European Journal of Operational Research, 241(2), 449–457. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.08.038
- Dirick, L., Claeskens, G., & Baesens, B. (2017). Time to default in credit scoring using survival analysis: A benchmark study. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 68(6), 652–665. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/s41274-016-0128-9
- Fine, J. P., & Gray, R. J. (1999). A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(446), 496–509. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1999.10474144
- Gerds, T. A. (2018). pec: Prediction error curves for risk prediction models in survival analysis. R package "pec". Version 2018.07.26.
- Gerds, T. A., & Schumacher, M. (2006). Consistent estimation of the expected Brier score in general survival models with right-censored event times. Biometrical Journal, 48(6), 1029–1040. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.200610301
- Graf, E., Schmoor, C., Sauerbrei, W., & Schumacher, M. (1999). Assessment and comparison of prognostic classification schemes for survival data. Statistics in Medicine, 18(17–18), 2529–2545. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19990915/30)18:17/18<2529::AID-SIM274>3.0.CO;2-5
- Haller, B., Schmidt, G., & Ulm, K. (2013). Applying competing risks regression models: An overview. Lifetime Data Analysis, 19(1), 33–58. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10985-012-9230-8
- Ishwaran, H. (2007). Variable importance in binary regression trees and forests. Electronic Journal of Statistics, 1(0), 519–537. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1214/07-EJS039
- Ishwaran, H., Gerds, T. A., Kogalur, U. B., Moore, R. D., Gange, S. J., & Lau, B. M. (2014). Random survival forests for competing risks. Biostatistics, 15(4), 757–773. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxu010
- Ishwaran, H., & Kogalur, U. B. (2013). randomForestSRC: Random Survival Forests for Survival, Regression and Classification., R package version 3.6.4.
- Ishwaran, H., Kogalur, U. B., Chen, X., & Minn, A. J. (2011). Random survival forests for high-dimensional data. Statistical Analysis and Data Mining, 4(1), 115–132. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sam.10103
- Ishwaran, H., Kogalur, U. B., Gorodeski, E. Z., Minn, A. J., & Lauer, M. S. (2010). High-dimensional variable selection for survival data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 105(489), 205–217. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1198/jasa.2009.tm08622
- Kuk, D., & Varadhan, L. (2013). Model selection in competing risks regression. Statistics in Medicine, 32(18), 3077–3088. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.5762
- Mogensen, U. B., Ishwaran, H., & Gerds, T. A. (2012). Evaluating random forests for survival analysis using prediction error curves. Journal of Statistical Software, 50(11), 1–23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v050.i11
- Stepanova, M., & Thomas, L. (2002). Survival analysis methods for personal loan data. Operations Research Quarterly, 50(2), 277–289. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.50.2.277.426
- Watkins, J. G. T., Vasnev, A. L., & Gerlach, R. (2014). Multiple event incidence and duration analysis for credit data incorporating nonstochastic loan maturity. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 29(4), 627–648. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.2329